Best Writer

Assignment Content
Purpose
This assignment is intended to give you an opportunity to strengthen your skills in gathering and analyzing business-related information. It provides a deeper understanding of how companies can look at globalization as part of their strategic and operational plans. The assignment has two parts: one focused on information research and analysis, and the other is on applied analytics.
Resources:
Microsoft Excel
“How Netflix Expanded to 190 Countries in 7 Years” from Harvard Business Review
Call Center Waiting Time
Part 1: Globalization and Information Research
Context:Companies that perform well in their country of origin usually consider expanding operations in new international markets. Deciding where, how, and when to expand is not an easy task, though.

Many issues need to be considered before crafting an expansion strategy and investing significant resources to this end, including:
the level of demand to be expected for the companys products/services
presence of local competitors
the regulatory, economic, demographic, and political environments
Carefully researching and analyzing these and other factors can help mitigate the inherent risk associated with an overseas expansion strategy, thus increasing the likelihood of success.

As a data analyst in your companys business development department, youve been tasked with the responsibility of recommending countries for international expansion. Youll write a report to the companys executive team with your research, analysis, and recommendations.
Instructions:
Write a clear, concise but complete summary covering the following items:
According to the article listed above, what were the most important strategic moves that propelled Netflixs successful international expansion?
The article mentions investments in big data and analytics as one of the elements accompanying the second phase of overseas expansion. Why was this investment important? What type of information did Netflix derive from the data collected?
According to the article, what is exponential globalization?
Not all international expansion strategies are a resounding success, however. Research an article or video that discusses an instance in which an American companys expansion efforts in another country failed. According to the article/video you selected, what were the main reasons for this failure? Do you agree with this assessment?
Explain some of the reasons why certain companies expansion plans have failed in the past.

Submit you analysis in a Word document following APA formatting rules.
Part 2: Hypothesis testing
Context:Your organization is evaluating the quality of its call center operations. One of the most important metrics in a call center is Time in Queue (TiQ), which is the time a customer has to wait before he/she is serviced by a Customer Service Representative (CSR). If a customer has to wait for too long, he/she is more likely to get discouraged and hang up. Furthermore, customers who have to wait too long in the queue typically report a negative overall experience with the call. Youve conducted an exhaustive literature review and found that the average TiQ in your industry is 2.5 minutes (150 seconds).
Another important metric is Service Time (ST), also known as Handle Time, which is the time a CSR spends servicing the customer. CSRs with more experience and deeper knowledge tend to resolve customer calls faster. Companies can improve average ST by providing more training to their CSRs or even by channeling calls according to area of expertise. Last month your company had an average ST of approximately 3.5 minutes (210 seconds). In an effort to improve this metric, the company has implemented a new protocol that channels calls to CSRs based on area of expertise. The new protocol (PE) is being tested side-by-side with the traditional (PT) protocol.
Instructions:
Access the Call Center Waiting Time file. Each row in the database corresponds to a different call. The column variables are as follows:
ProtocolType: indicates protocol type, either PT or PE
QueueTime: Time in Queue, in seconds
ServiceTime: Service Time, in seconds
Perform a test of hypothesis to determine whether the average TiQ is lower than the industry standard of 2.5 minutes (150 seconds). Use a significance level of =0.05.
Evaluate if the company should allocate more resources to improve its average TiQ.
Perform a test of hypothesis to determine whether the average ST with service protocol PE is lower than with the PT protocol. Use a significance level of =0.05.
Assess if the new protocol served its purpose. (Hint: this should be a test of means for 2 independent groups.)
Submit your calculations and a 175-word summary of your conclusions.

Submit your assignment as a Word document following APA formatting rules. Do not submit the spreadsheet.

You are required to cite your source(s) as it relates to your application slide. Other citations are permitted, but this is not a requirement for the assignment.
Title slide (first slide): Include a title slide with your name and the title of the presentation.
Scenario Slide (one slide): This slide should include the approved patient scenario from Milestone 1 and 2. You will use the approved patient scenario and include a disease process, diagnosis, OR identify a patient with a desire to maintain good health and prevent illness and who would benefit from an already developed and reliable mHealth app. Include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn.
mHealth application slide (one slide): Identify a developed and reliable mHealth app that could benefit the patient. Describe the app, including the following.
Name of app
Purpose of app
Intended audience
Mobile device(s) upon which the app will operate
Where to download or obtain it (include a working link if it is to be downloaded from a website)
Any other information you believe would be pertinent to this situation
Be sure to cite all sources you use.
Teaching slide(s) (one to three slides): Prepare slides that contain important points about the app that you want to teach to the patient, such as how to use the app safely and effectively (including how to interpret and act on the information that is provided).
Evaluation slide(s) (one to three slides): Describe how you would determine the success of the patient’s use of this app. For example, include ways to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching plan that are a good fit for the type of app and focus on specific ways that this app benefits the patient’s health and wellness.
References (last slide): List any references for sources that were used and cited in the presentation.
Number of PowerPoint slides: 6-10 slides total
Writing and design: There should be no spelling or grammatical errors. Writing is concise and clear. Avoid words that the patient may not understand. Slides are visually appealing, incorporating graphics, photographs, colors, and themes.
Review the section on Academic Integrity Policy found in the RNBSN Policies. All work must be original (in your own words) unless properly cited.
Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint Slideshows
Be creative but realistic.
Incorporate graphics, color, themes, or photographs to increase interest.
Make each slide easy to read with short bullet points and large font. You may use speaker notes for full sentences.
Review directions thoroughly.
Cite all sources within the slides with (author, year), as well as on the reference slide.
Proofread prior to final submission.
Check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.
Abide by the Chamberlain academic integrity policy.
Tutorial: For those not familiar with the development of a PowerPoint slideshow, the following link to the Microsoft website may be helpful. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/support/training-FX101782702.aspx.
(Links to an external site.)
The Chamberlain Student Success Strategies (SSPRNBSN) offers a module on Computer Literacy that contains a section on PowerPoint. SSPRNBSN is a course tile on your dashboard.
I have also uploaded my paper written to help with the assignment.

I have

Please respond to the discussion posts by my 2 classmates. Feel free to also use references not provided by me.
The assignment is based on https://youtu.be/i9x0UO8MY0g.

Additional links/readings
chapter 3 and 5 in the textbook
https://www.zdnet.com/article/what-is-cloud-computing-everything-you-need-to-know-from-public-and-private-cloud-to-software-as-a/

nstructions
There are two parts to this assignment.

Part 1 — Doing Research
Get your topic approved in an email before doing the following. I want to see what your topic is and what your stance on it will be.
Using your cleared topic as your index subject, I want you to perform the following tasks. (If an index has nothing on your topic, indicate so and then just list something else you find there.)

1) Put your subject/opinion on it here –>

Use this Link to the Kirkwood Library –> http://guides.kirkwood.edu/dl

2) Search in CQreseacher for your topic. Describe what you find there. Any useful background data?
What might they contribute to your essay?

Look into the Opposing Viewpoints in Context index — list 3 articles relevant you find there. This an actual index.

3) Look in World Cat for articles and books. List three articles and 3 books you find on your subject (if there are none, list three books of other sorts).
Pick another library from the Local Libraries tab and search it for books. Indicate which library you looked into and list three books of relevance you find there.
What might these titles contribute to your essay?

4) Look in Academic Search Elite. List three articles found there relevant to your subject.
What might these contribute to your essay?

Look in Academic OneFile. List three articles relevant to your subject.
What might these contribute to your essay?

5)Go to EBSCOhost eBooks. List 3 different books from your previous ebook search you find there.
Go to Project Muse ebooks. List 3 different books you find there (again, try not to duplicate).

Go to Googlebooks — list three books you find there. (Preferably on your subject.)
Do a Google Scholar search on your subject. List two works that might be relevant.
What might these works contribute to your essay?
List out author(s), title and dates in above submissions.

Part 2 — Looking at an essay
Please read the position paper — Designated Hitter Essay
Respond to the following:

1) How effective is the title? In the introduction, how does the author set up the subject? What background data does he provide? Locate her thesis statement. Write it here. Is it an appropriately formed thesis?

2) What are her reasons to support her thesis? Write them out here.
In what ways does the author refute her opponent’s positions? What evidence does she present to support and to develop her points? Is each point fully developed?
Look at her Works Cited — are these sources credible to her opponent?
Start Date
Jun 6, 2021 8:00 PM
End Date
Jun 13, 2021 4:00 PM
Submit Assignment
Files to submit
(0) file(s) to submit

After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.
Add a File
Record Audio
Record Video
Comments
Format
Paragraph
Address
Preformatted
H1 – Heading 1
H2 – Heading 2
H3 – Heading 3
H4 – Heading 4
H5 – Heading 5
H6 – Heading 6
Font Family
Arabic Transparent
Arial (Recommended)
Comic Sans
Courier
Ezra SIL
Georgia
SBL Hebrew
Simplified Arabic
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Traditional Arabic
Trebuchet
Verdana
(Dotum)
(Sim Sun)
(Ming Liu)
Font Size
1 (8pt)
2 (10pt)
3 (12pt)
4 (14pt)
5 (18pt)
6 (24pt)
7 (36pt)

Submit a 2 page paper that addresses the following:
Explain whether each
exchange in the Rating Samples for MI Spirit document is consistent with
the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific.
In instances where
you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational
interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be
consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Again, be
specific.

Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide rationales for your answers. Make sure to provide citations/references for your answers in APA format.

Albert Mitchell is a 36-year-old man who will be traveling to Dubai to give a business presentation in 3 months. Although he has traveled widely in the United States as a consultant, this is his first trip to the Middle East.
He requests information regarding immunizations needed before his trip. Albert states that as he will be in Dubai for only a few days, he is unlikely to contract a disease in such a short time and therefore believes that it is illogical to obtain immunizations.
Albert states that he has heard that the side effects of the immunizations might be worse than the diseases they prevent. He is also concerned about leaving his wife at home alone because she is 6 months pregnant.
Reflective Questions
How would you address Alberts beliefs?
What learning would be needed in each domain?
What learning theories would you consider?
How might his family concerns be addressed?

Find 2 peer-reviewed articles that are no more than 4 years old and closely relate to the concept.
After reading the articles, select the 1 article that you wish to summarize. Your thread should be in APA format, use the following headings, and include the information listed below in the following format and be posted directly in the discussion board:

Definition: a brief definition of the key term; this does not count in the word requirement. The definition must be cited to the source.

Summary: Choose 1 of the articles and clearly summarize it in your own words. This must be 150 word minimum. While the majority of the summary should be focused on the article, be sure to note the article’s author as well as his/her credentials. This information should be clearly cited.

Discussion: Using a minimum of 400 words, write a brief discussion in your own words of how the article relates to the selected concept. The discussion should include input from BOTH ARTICLES chosen for the key concept. Some discussion could include whether the articles agree or disagree; recommendations in the articles for integration in the workplace, etc.

Biblical Integration: You must integrate your key term with a biblical truth. Integration of biblical truth is not simply listing a Bible verse but connecting the Scripture to the concept being covered. This section must be a minimum of 100 words.

References: All references must be listed at the bottom of the thread in current APA format.

Be sure to use the headers (Definition, Summary, Discussion, Biblical Integration, References) in your thread to ensure that all aspects of the assignment are completed as required. Use 3rd person.

Now that you have explored the five main areas of Advertising, where do you see yourself?
Write a three-paragraph discussion about what area in Advertising interests you the most. If you are undecided between two, please detail those.
Make sure to include:
1. Area of interest (one or two)
2. Explain why
3. Detail what you would like to learn about the area
4. Identify 3 personal traits (strengths) that will set you apart
5. Set 3 goals that will pave the way towards a career in Advertising

Watch the ESPN documentary, 30 for 30: The Price of Gold, covering the Tonya Harding and Nancy Kerrigan controversy.
Write a 800-1000 word paper that addresses the following:
1. Evaluate how well the behavior of Tonya Harding and/or her associates qualifies as sabotage, spiteful, and/or violent (be clear about each definition and which ones fit).
2. Document how the structure and rewards of figure skating tournaments (especially for the Olympic gold) fit within or illustrate the concepts and explanations from this class for what makes sabotage, spite and violence more likely in sports.
3. Reflecting upon content in this module, are there ways to make Olympic Figure Skating less susceptible to these types of behaviors and rivalries?

1. Rubric and data.CSV attached
2. All graphs and (normal distribution, linear fit scattered plot, finding p values, etc
3. Detailed explanation required with intext citations.
4.Formatting Appendices Help attached
Purpose of the Assignment: The purpose of this team assignment is to demonstrate your understanding of statistical tests, application of the correct statistical test to answer a research question, interpretation of the statistical results in common English language, and application of the findings to nursing practice, research, and education.
Detailed Description of the Assignment: The final Unit 5 assignment requires statistical analysis and interpretation of a data set weve been using since Unit 1. Included in the paper will be the application of the findings to nursing practice, research, and education. Youve been working on the statistical tests and the interpretation across the weekly activities. Each Units activities have built upon this final assignment. Now it is time to pull our analyses and interpretations together in a report format. Please follow the rubric criteria at the bottom of this page for your final assignment.
*Closely read and follow the detailed instructions on the grading rubric at the bottom of this page. The charts and tables you will need in the paper are fully described on the rubric.
Summary list of the grading rubric questions to be answered:
1. Is the variable “Years of Experience” normally distributed? Is there a linear relationship between the variable’s years of experience and household income?
2. Is there a statistically significant difference between the pretest mean cholesterol levels (PretestChol) of the control and intervention groups?

Rubric
Unit 5 Assignment Student Learning Outcome(s)
Integrate evidence-based nursing practice and related sciences to improve nursing care to individuals, families, and communities.
Demonstrate role development by performing in the role of nurse leader or educator by integrating the concepts related to the area of practice demonstrating expertise, evidence-based practice, and the appropriate competencies.

Week 5 Final Assignment
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA and general formatting
Follows APA Format 6th or most current edition.
Cover page with Originality Statement.
Body of paper, double-spaced lines, correct use of headings and subheadings, correct use of in-text citations.
Direct quotes and paraphrasing done per APA guidelines. Maximum 5% of total word count in direct quotes.
Reference page formatted for the type of resource used, includes DOI where needed.
Appendices appropriately formatted; figures and charts appropriately formatted.
Introduction and conclusions paragraph present; includes purpose statement to paper.
15 to >13.0 pts
Exemplary. APA shows mastery and there are no spelling, grammar, or formatting issues identified. Originality report shows 0%. In-text and reference citations are in APA format without error. Originality report shows 0%.
13 to >11.0 pts
Accomplished. APA Format is followed with < 3 formatting errors. Spelling and grammar are near-perfect with < 3 errors. No evidence of plagiarism or questions of originality in document. All in text citations are correctly done and all references on reference page are in APA format with < 3 errors. Originality Report < 2%. 11 to >8.0 pts
Developing. Attempts made to demonstrate APA formatting, but multiple errors remain in APA, grammar, or spelling. Direct Quotes and paraphrasing show effort toward recognizing authors correctly, but originality is still lacking. Weak effort to APA Writing Style formatting.
8 to >0 pts
Beginning. Title page, body of text, references, and appendices not formatted in APA format. Spelling and grammar errors are many. Formatting line spacing, spacing after punctuation do not follow APA. More than 5% direct quotes. Direct quotes and paraphrasing not correctly noted. Evidence of plagiarism.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
RQ1: What are the demographic characteristics of the sample of RN’s?
Report in paragraph format the sample size, gender, age in years, household income, years in current position, years RN experience, Type of Nursing Specialty, Highest Education Level, Participation on a Council, and Years Until Retirement.
Include at least one clearly labelled bar chart and one pie chart for a variable of your choice.
Use a table to display the data counts, percentages, means, and standard deviations for all demographic characteristics. See Table 5.5, page 135 in APA Manual for an example.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary. All criteria met. Writing clear. Table written in APA format. Statistical answers accurate.
8 to >6.0 pts
Accomplished. Missing 1 criteria, writing clear, table formatting not APA, statistical answers accurate.
6 to >4.0 pts
Developing. Missing 1 criteria, writing unclear, table formatting not APA, statistical answers accurate.
4 to >0 pts
Beginning. Missing more than 1 criteria, writing unclear, table formatting not in APA format, and statistical answers incorrect.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
RQ2: Is the variable Years of Experience normally distributed? Show on histogram and support your answer. Is there a linear relationship between the variables years of experience and household income? Show on a scatterplot and support your answer.
Report in paragraph format the answer to the research questions.
Use a clearly labelled and titled histogram and scatterplot to support your answers.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary. All criteria met. Writing clear. Statistical answers accurate. Histogram and scatterplots labelled.
8 to >6.0 pts
Accomplished. All criteria met, writing may be unclear but statistical answers are correct. Histogram and scatterplots may lack clear labels for interpretation.
6 to >4.0 pts
Developing. One criteria unmet, writing may be unclear but statistical answers are correct. Histogram and scatterplots may lack clear labels.
4 to >0 pts
Beginning. One or more criteria missing, statistical answers incorrect, histogram and scatterplots lack clear labelling for interpretation.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
RQ3: Is there a statistically significant difference between the pretest mean cholesterol levels (PretestChol) of the control and intervention groups?
Select the appropriate test.
Answer in paragraph format including the statistical results as you would see written in a standard research report Results section and as practiced in class.
Include the clearly labelled and titled statistical software output in the Appendices.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary. The appropriate test was conducted. The answer is clear in 3-parts (test stated, results stated, interpretation in plain English), output in the Appendices clearly labelled for interpretation.
8 to >6.0 pts
Accomplished. The appropriate test was conducted but the answers lacked the 3-part response. Output in the appendices is clearly labelled for interpretation.
6 to >4.0 pts
Developing. An incorrect test was conducted but a 3-part response was stated for the result. The output in the appendices is clearly labelled for interpretation.
4 to >0 pts
Beginning. An incorrect test was conducted and the response lacks the 3-part explanation. Output may/may not be clearly labelled for interpretation.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
RQ4: Is mean RN satisfaction (NurseSatisMean) related to Income Groups (IncomeGrp) of the RNs?
Select the appropriate test.
Answer in paragraph format including the statistical results as you would see written in a standard research report Results section and as practiced in class.
Include the clearly labelled and titled statistical software output in the Appendices.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary. The appropriate test was conducted. The answer is clear in 3-parts (test stated, results stated, interpretation in plain English), output in the Appendices clearly labelled for interpretation.
8 to >6.0 pts
Accomplished. The appropriate test was conducted but the answers lacked the 3-part response. Output in the appendices is clearly labelled for interpretation.
6 to >4.0 pts
Developing. An incorrect test was conducted but a 3-part response was stated for the result. The output in the appendices is clearly labelled for interpretation.
4 to >0 pts
Beginning. An incorrect test was conducted and the response lacks the 3-part explanation. Output may/may not be clearly labelled for interpretation.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
RQ5: Is there a statistically significant association between Participation on a Council (ParticipateCouncil) and Continuing Nursing Education (ContHigherEd)?
Select the appropriate test.
Answer in paragraph format including the statistical results as you would see written in a standard research report Results section and as practiced in class.
Include the clearly labelled and titled statistical software output in the Appendices.
10 pts
Exemplary. The appropriate test was conducted. The answer is clear in 3-parts (test stated, results stated, interpretation in plain English), output in the Appendices clearly labelled for interpretation.
8 pts
Accomplished. The appropriate test was conducted but the answers lacked the 3-part response. Output in the appendices is clearly labelled for interpretation.
6 pts
Developing. An incorrect test was conducted but a 3-part response was stated for the result. The output in the appendices is clearly labelled for interpretation.
4 pts
Beginning. An incorrect test was conducted and the response lacks the 3-part explanation. Output may/may not be clearly labelled for interpretation.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
RQ6: Is the age of the nurse associated with their pretest cholesterol level (Pretest Chol)?
Select the appropriate test.
Answer in paragraph format including the statistical results as you would see written in a standard research report Results section and as practiced in class.
Include the clearly labelled and titled statistical software output in the Appendices.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary. The appropriate test was conducted. The answer is clear in 3-parts (test stated, results stated, interpretation in plain English), output in the Appendices clearly labelled for interpretation.
8 to >6.0 pts
Accomplished. The appropriate test was conducted but the answers lacked the 3-part response. Output in the appendices is clearly labelled for interpretation.
6 to >4.0 pts
An incorrect test was conducted but a 3-part response was stated for the result. The output in the appendices is clearly labelled for interpretation.
4 to >0 pts
Beginning. An incorrect test was conducted and the response lacks the 3-part explanation. Output may/may not be clearly labelled for interpretation.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
RQ7: Can the number of years of RN experience (YrsRNExp) predict the number of medication errors (NumMedErrorsreported) a nurse will make?
Select the appropriate test.
Answer in paragraph format including the statistical results as you would see written in a standard research report Results section and as practiced in class.
Include the clearly labelled and titled statistical software output in the Appendices.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary. The appropriate test was conducted. The answer is clear in 3-parts (test stated, results stated, interpretation in plain English), output in the Appendices clearly labelled for interpretation.
8 to >6.0 pts
Accomplished. The appropriate test was conducted but the answers lacked the 3-part response. Output in the appendices is clearly labelled for interpretation.
6 to >4.0 pts
Developing. An incorrect test was conducted but a 3-part response was stated for the result. The output in the appendices is clearly labelled for interpretation.
4 to >0 pts
Beginning.An incorrect test was conducted and the response lacks the 3-part explanation. Output may/may not be clearly labelled for interpretation.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Conclusions in Plain English
Summarize the results of the investigation in terms that a bedside nurse would understand.
Apply the results to nursing practice, research, and education.
15 to >13.0 pts
Exemplary. The results of each test are clearly summarized and understandable from the bedside nurses perspective (Plain English). Clear statements apply the results to nursing practice, research, and education.
13 to >11.0 pts
Accomplished. The results of each test are summarized but not understandable in Plain English. The statements applying the results to nursing practice, research, and education may be confusing.
11 to >8.0 pts
Developing. Some results of each test are not summarized or are not understandable in Plain English. The Results may/may not been applied to practice, research, and education.
8 to >0 pts
Beginning. The results of each test are not clearly summarized in Plain English. The results are not applied to nursing practice, research, or education.
15 pts
Total Points: 100
Previous
Next