Why should we study history? To what purpose?

Read and think on the quotes shown below.
– Tell us what you think these quotes mean and mean for us as people living in the 21st century.

“We enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.” President John F. Kennedy
“The woman who is known only through a man is known wrong.” Henry Adams from Education of Henry Adams
“We are not makers of history; we are made by history.” Martin Luther King, Jr.
“The more you know of your history, the more liberated you are.” Maya Angelou

Now consider this question.

Why should we study history? To what purpose?

Video Review – Pharmaceutical Industry

Video review needs to be 2-3 pages (12-font, single spaced). Provide a minimum of 4 sources to support your review.

Who’s responsible for health care costs? Is it hospitals or Big Pharma?
As you reflect on the debate, were there additional points you might have raised if you had participated? How effective was the debate format? Who do you think won?
Write a 2-3 page review that includes the main points discussed. Provide your critical feedback along with your position taken to the motion: “Blame Big Pharma for Out of Control Healthcare Cost”

The rubric is also attached.

Watch the debate on the link below — Blame Big Pharma for Out-of-Control Health Care Costs (1:36:48)

Blame Big Pharma for Out-of-Control Health Care Costs

Mini Ethnography FINAL VERSION

JSIS 202 MINI-ETHNOGRAPHY ASSIGNMENT
Final Project due by August 21, 11;59PM
The final project is doing an online or in-person ethnographic field research project. Ethnography is most often associated with anthropology, but it is used across the social sciences. Ethnography involves the participation in and observation of social life. Think about this paper as your chance to “make the familiar strange” by describing and analyzing the culture of a particular site. For this assignment, you will analyze a space that you frequently use—e.g. your workplace, gym, classes/library, website of an NGO, Tik Tok, YouTube, or a fanfiction site. You can start your observations with these sample questions in mind: How power works in my research site? How is gender performed in the observed interactions? How is “otherness” constructed in the observed interaction? How are boundaries between “insiders” and “outsiders” (re)produced?
I want you to pick interesting social process/cultural event/phenomena and go out into the world and observe and/or participate in it. To gain a full picture of the real or virtual site’s culture, you should visit it at least three times and take notes of your observations. Describe the interactions, activities and the space. The purpose of visiting more than once is to capture new dynamics and interactions as they change over time.
Interpret your observations by using one of the course concepts (e.g. ethnocentrism, hegemony, disciplinary power, liminal space, humanitarian aid, structural violence, etc) or by drawing upon the authors we’ve read to support your analysis. Sample topics include: the socialization and guild dynamics of a Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game (MMORPG); reaction videos; or the gender and class dynamics of mommy bloggers on Instagram. If possible, pick spaces that you are already part of.
In order to receive credit for this assignment (i.e. 30% of your grade) you must complete two assignments. Failure to do so means no credit for the assignment.
(%20) Final Project: Due by August 21 @11:59pm.
It is a traditional research paper of 8 pages
Formatting: 12-pt font, Times New Roman, 1-inch margins, double spaced, 8 pages including a bibliography page, you can use any citation guides as long as you are consistent throughout your paper
Grading: You will be graded on how well you follow the assignment directions, the clarity of your writing, your field notes, the thoroughness of analysis and interpretation, how well you connect your observations to concepts covered in class, and your general creativity. You are encouraged to see me during office hours to get advice and help with your project.
————–
STEP BY STEP: HOW TO DO YOUR ETHNOGRAPHIC PROJECT?
a brief description of what cultural activity, interaction, and site you are going to study;
a brief justification of how your activity relates to a concept discussed in class;
a discussion of why you have chosen this particular topic;
how you think multiple observations of this activity will be
Step 1. The Outline
Your outline must include:
Step 2. Doing the research
You are to observe a cultural “activity” on three separate occasions (for a total of approximately 2-3 hours, over the three periods) and write detailed notes about what you see, smell, hear, think, and experience. Use a small notebook to jot down notes during or immediately after the activity. Do not use any recording devices (recorders, cameras, phones etc.). In the process, you will come up with your own system for taking fieldnotes. Some people use fragmentary notes (a word, a phrase), some use prose right away, some divide the page in half and record observations on one side and ideas –questions, judgments, impressions – on the other.

Do no harm in the field. Do not use “real” names of people. Make up names (pseudonyms) in your notes. Depending on your context, you may need to ask permission to conduct your research (e.g. “Is it alright if I take some notes about the office for a class assignment. I won’t use anyone’s real names.”) For some online spaces, it may be less necessary to get consent. Avoid picking any subject that involves minors (under 18) or “vulnerable populations” (like homeless, incarcerated, institutionalized people).
As soon as you can, find a computer and transcribe your scribblings into something more expansive, with full sentences. This allows you to clarify what you wrote, add things you forgot to record, and most importantly suggest some interpretations.
Hand in the typed transcription of your field notes. This is important. WITHOUT NOTES, YOU WON’T GET FULL CREDIT FOR THE OUTLIE & ROUGH DRAFT THAT IS DUE BY AUGUST 5.
***SEE SUPPLEMENTARY READING [TIERNEY 2002
Actions
] FOR BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION.
Step 3. Writing the Paper. Your write-up should include all of the following (use the
bolded headers in your paper to separate each section).
Introduction: The Field Site and the Research Question. Briefly describe the event/activity that you are Why is it interesting? What is the general cultural question or theme that this research helped you better understand (power, gender, alterity)?
In your introduction, as in all papers, provide the thesis statement about what your research illustrated. For example: “Through multiple observations of my office, I gained insight in how hierarchies are gendered at work.” Or: “Through close observation of a football team, I learned how masculinity is performed through jokes and the use of certain kind of labels.” Or: “By observing a market, I gained insights into ideas of cultural difference are used to sell specific products.” These are just examples, you will have your own ideas.
Methods: How did you collect your data? Was it mostly observation? Was it in-person or virtual? Did you participate? Did you talk to anyone? Did any problems come up in getting access to this site? When did you observe this activity?
Description: Is there a story or vignette that illustrates important themes? Paint a picture of important moments or interactions or Who is involved in the activity (age, gender, religion, political views, etc.)? What is the purpose of this activity? What types of artifacts (e.g., clothing, zombie dart guns, food) or specific environmental conditions (e.g., weather or specific location) are present and/or necessary for this event? What kind of language or labels was used? Be as detailed as possible here. Note that this section will draw selectively from your transcribed field notes. Use descriptions of interactions that relate to your argument. These descriptions may offer a different examples of what you are studying, and you may seek to try to explain those differences in your interpretation section.

Interpretation and Findings. THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PART OF THE PAPER. Describe what you learned from this activity and why it was important. Did you observe something that reinforced or conflicted with what you learned in class? How does it relate to a concept(s) we have discussed in class? You should cite course reading material that specifically discusses this concept. You can also draw from concepts and examples discussed in the lecture. How did having multiple observations of the same activity impact your findings? Was the activity consistent over time or did you get different results each time?
Did you observe the event at different times of the day?
Conclusion: Reactions and Reflections: What is the big “take-away” of the paper? What challenges did you encounter? What did this activity teach you?

Write a 1,000-word essay in which you respond to the prompt below. In your essays, I’m looking not only at the quality and depth of your brainstorms but at the quality and precision of your writing as well.

Write a 1,000-word essay in which you respond to the prompt below. In your essays, I’m looking not only at the quality and depth of your brainstorms but at the quality and precision of your writing as well. In other words, “good ideas” are important, but “good writing” is equally important here. So what is “good writing”?
1. Writing that reflects a mastery of Essay-Mechanics. I want you to write a solid introduction that — first of all — introduces the main subjects your essay will examine. Your intro-paragraph should culminate in a thesis statement in which you mention the main topics you’ve just introduced and tie them together in some specific way that your body-paragraphs will elaborate upon. I want a series of body-paragraphs that allude directly to your thesis statement — clarifying it, giving examples of it, exploring different dimensions of it, etc. And I’d like to see a concluding paragraph that doesn’t simply summarize your whole paper or simply restate your thesis. You need to actually draw some sort of conclusion about your main subjects — something about them that only appears to you after you’ve considered them at some length in light of your thesis.
2. Writing that reflects a mastery of Paragraph-Mechanics. Your Intro- and Body-Paragraphs should be fully developed (i.e., at lest 5 sentences long). Conclusion-Paragraphs can be short, though. Sometimes a single sentence is enough. I’d like to see topic-sentences in all your body-paragraphs — sentences that refer back to your thesis statement by repeating key phrases from it or paraphrasing it in other words.
3. Writing that reflects a mastery of Sentence-Mechanics. Proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation are very important, so you will want to leave yourself extra time to revise your wording and phrasing. Some of you may be a bit rusty with your grammar, and you may find it helpful to work with online tutors (Net Tutor and/or the tutors in our college’s Library and Learning Center).
4. Writing that reflects a mastery of Citation-Mechanics. You’ll need to cite the works that you refer to over the course of your essay. This includes both the essays and the images within our textbook. And if you refer to any additional resources (e.g., articles, websites, paintings, youtube videos, etc.), you’ll need to cite those as well. All of your citations should be in proper MLA format — with in-text (parenthetical) citations within the essay itself and a Works Cited page appearing as the last page of your essay.
With “good ideas” presented in “good writing,” you’ll produce work that you and I both can be proud of.
Writing Prompt
Take another look at Charlie Chaplin’s Pay Day. Chaplin is not only considered to be one of the greatest comedians of silent cinema, but one of the greatest theorists of human nature as well. His comedy is never just comedy; it’s always also a comment on the state of our humanity in relation to specific circumstances and social situations.
I’ll leave it up to you to explain to me — in your essays — what Chaplin’s understanding of our human nature is. Watch Pay Day again and think about this. What does Chaplin seem to be saying in this film about the nature of humankind? Point out specific scenes in the film and explain how these scenes reflect Chaplin’s views.
As you explain this to me, I want you to refer to AT LEAST TWO of the essays we’ve read in this unit. Compare and/or contrast Chaplin’s view of human nature to the views of (pick 2 or more).
Mencius
Hsun Tzu
Thomas Hobbes
Nicholas Carr
Carl Jung
As usual, I’ll need a Works Cited page at the end of this essay. You’ll need to cite the materials in our textbook AND you’ll need to figure out how to cite Chaplin’s film. Use the Ebooks that are embedded in our Canvas site if you need assistance with this.

Please reflect on the knowledge you have gain in this course. Please include 400 words in your initial post

This is a summary of the class’s learning outcomes and each week’s assignment. I need a reflection
of what I learned during the class as explained below

Topical Course Outline (weekly)
1. FoundationsofPrescriptivePractice
2. PharmacokineticsandPharmacodynamics
3. TheArtandScienceofPharmacotherapeutics
4. TopicalAgents
5 Renal/GenitourinaryAgents
6 HealthPromotion
7. CardiovascularAgents
8. EndocrineAgents
9. Anti-infective 10.Gastrointestinal Agents 11.Psychotropic Agents
12.Central Nervous System Agents
13.Musculoskeletal Agents
14.Reproductive Agents
15.Respiratory Agents

Course Description
This course is designed to expand the student’s knowledge of pharmaco- therapeutics and pharmaco-kinetics to broad categories of pharmacologic agents. Focus will be on pharmaco-therapeutic modalities utilized by advanced practice nurses.
Student Learning Outcomes
After completing this course, the student should be able to:
Pointouttheroleoftheadvancedpracticenurseintheinterdisciplinaryteamas it relates to pharmacotherapy
Illustrateanunderstandingofbasicpharmacotherapeuticprinciples(PLO9,5).
Identifythepharmacologicalactionsofmedicationsusedtotreatcommon
disease entities.
Evaluatedrugregimenstoprovidesafedrugtherapy(PLO6,8).
Design individualised, comprehensive pharmacotherapy plans, and drug
monitoring based on patient-specific conditions
Selectaccessibleresourcesfordrugtherapyusingcurrentevidence-based
practices in clinical expertise

METHODS OF INQUIRY

We’ve spent most of this week focusing on various forms of observational research. However, as we discussed, there are several other forms of qualitative research. One that we have used quite extensively in the MACJ is qualitative interviewing. This method relies extensively on open-ended questions (remember those from our discussion of survey methods). The overarching goal of this form of research is to develop a deep understanding of the participant’s attitudes, beliefs, and experiences on the topic of research. However, this requires researchers to develop skills that have not been needed for the previous forms of methods discussed. Specifically, it requires researchers to listen to lengthy answers, take notes, ask thoughtful follow-up questions, and maintain an inter-personal relationship.
These skills also illustrate some of the biggest challenges of this approach. Researchers need to be able to balance the interpersonal dimension with the objective nature of effective research methods. The first (of the three) videos I had you watch addressed some of the best practices in qualitative interviewing. While watching this video make sure to note what is required of this process and some of the common road-bumps that need to be avoided (or addressed). Next, I had you watch two examples of interviewing. The first includes multiple mistakes, errors, and common missteps, while the second is the polar opposite. This shows us exactly what we are looking for in effective qualitative interviewing.
For this week’s discussion, I want you to reflect on these videos. First, what do you feel was the biggest problem in the first example of interviewing? In other words, what mistake do you think would have the biggest impact on the researcher’s findings? Next, how did the researcher in the second video avoid these mistakes? Finally, reflecting on the best practices in the first video, which aspect do you feel you would have the hardest time with? How would you try to make sure that you achieve this best practice?

Applying Theries Paper

Prepare
a 750- to 1,250-word paper that explains how Piaget’s, Vygotsky’s, and
the information processing theories of cognitive development inform our
understanding of how to effectively teach children in middle childhood.
Any form of teaching is appropriate for this paper. For example,
classroom instruction, coaching in sports, mentoring, or Sunday school.
Address the following in your paper:
Summarize key aspects of each theory as it relates to learning in middle childhood.
Identify one concept from each theory that supports our understanding of learning and cognitive growth in middle childhood.
Describe how a teacher would apply these concepts to teaching
children of 6–12 years old. Consider physical environment, as well as
content and its delivery.

A 5,000-word written submission in two parts, discussing the concept of innovation and education.

This is the brief from my university:

For the assessment you will discuss the concept of innovation and education, and then select and analyse an example of educational innovation. The criteria you will be judged against are below:
Part 1 (worth 50% of the grade)
Examine what ‘innovation in education’ is and the factors which influence it, identifying a specific example of an educational innovation.
Assessment Criteria:
A discussion of what constitutes educational innovation based on relevant theory, research, and policy.
A critical analysis of the political, economic, social, cultural, and technological influences on educational policy.
Research, select and describe a recent example of educational innovation including a justification of why it has been selected.

Part 2 (worth 50% of the grade)
Evaluate your chosen educational Innovation with consideration of how it could be used in your own professional context.
Assessment Criteria:
Critically evaluate the background and rationale for the selected educational innovation drawing on theory, research and policy discussed in part 1.
Critically evaluate the effectiveness, or potential effectiveness, of the selected educational innovation drawing on theory, research and policy discussed in part 1.
Make recommendations relating to own future practice in relation to the critical discussions of the selected educational innovation.

My own notes on my chosen innovation:
For part 2, I would like to focus on the IB(International Baccalaureate) curriculum in International Schools, more specifically the innovation associated with the IB system’s final assessment, and the innovation associated with Collaborative Planning that takes place among the teachers within IB schools as opposed to other school systems.

Arguementative paper- Nursing home staffing

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

Textbook: Chapter 15
Lesson
Completed Week 5 Source Evaluation Worksheet (included annotated bibliography)
Minimum of 5 scholarly sources
Introduction

This week, all the hard work you have done in researching your topic and issue will come to fruition in your argumentative paper. Once you feel you have got the final draft, try to put the paper aside, even for a few hours, and then read it again.
Did you address at least three aspects of the issue you chose?
Does each aspect have relevant and authoritative evidence in support of your point?
Have you included a view that is in opposition to your viewpoint, and have you answered that opposing view, pointing out its flaws in such a way as to refute it?

This week, you will complete your argumentative paper. Following the directions in assigned textbook reading on how write an argumentative essay on the issue you chose in Week 1. Be sure your essay contains the following:
An opening paragraph that states a clear thesis that is focused, plausible, and arguable and that gives direction and purpose to the paper
A fair-minded, balanced, and objective development of the pros and cons of the issue in a well-organized sequence of ideas, free of mechanical errors
Credible, reliable, and authoritative evidence in support of the points made
A strong conclusion that summarizes your views, reminds the audience of the issue and its importance, and shows in brief that you have successfully defended your thesis
Note
As you do your research, it is permissible to change your sources. Also, because of the recency and relevance of these issues, no sources older than 5 years should be used other than as historical information. Critical thinkers do the research first and then side with the preponderance of evidence. You might want to follow that principle.

Writing

Requirements (APA format)

Length: 4-6 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page