Best Writer

Let’s jump in and learn about Yuri Kochiyama, a tireless civil rights advocate, and apply her ideas to today.
There are TWO (2) links below to watch and TWO (2) links below to read:

Asian American and Pacific Islander Civil Rights Heroes – Yuri Kochiyama – Link (2 minutes) – Watch & Read Write-up Below the Video (Links to an external site.)

Yuri Kochiyama – Meeting Malcolm X (A Famous Civil Rights Leader) – Link (3 Minutes) (Links to an external site.)

Link – Slate – Japanese-American Activist Who Helped Win Reparations, Witnessed Malcolm X Shooting Dies at 93 (1-minute read) (Links to an external site.)

Link – ABC News – Nearly 600 migrant children who were housed at Long Beach shelter reunited with family, sponsors (3-minute read) (Links to an external site.)

After watching and reading the above links, here is your DQ instructions:
Imagine you are Yuri Kochiyama, so you are writing in first person like YOU are her. Imagine she took a time machine to the future (with us now) and learned about the separation of migrant families.

Write a speech that contains:

* minimum 5 sentences about your 5 Ws (who, what, when, why, and how) – this is practice for your final exam. If one of the 5 Ws repeats information, then skip it. Be detailed and thorough.
* minimum of 15 sentences about why it is important to advocate for issues that do not immediately affect you and for people who may not look like you. Yuri used evidence and specific information in her speeches, so you should, too.
* minimum 1 sentence about what Kochiyama would say about the separation of migrant families, including the deaths of children in detention centers, at the US border

* Make sure you provide 1 (one) citation from each of the required 4 (four) sources (i.e. As stated in the CBS News article, “XYZ.”). Demonstrate that you engaged with the learning materials assigned above.

1) Find two examples of cultural hybridity (https://sociologydictionary.org/cultural-hybridization/) that you experience in your daily life.

2) Trace these two examples to their place of origin and determine what role (if any) they have in that original culture.

3) Engage your colleagues in a discussion regarding the following:
– Present your two examples of cultural hybridity.
— Describe their places of origin
— What role (if any) do they have in that original culture?

Once you’ve confirmed your initial post has a “blue” similarity score (6% similarity or less),
If you received a “green” score (6-24% match), make sure the quoted material is properly cited (with quote marks and clear reference to the original source).

The initial post need 300 words, 100 words for each repies.

You need to write a one-page opinion paper on something that was meaningful to you in the chapter. You may agree or disagree with the material, but you need to explain why you think and feel that way. You may also express confusion on a topic from the chapter. I am not asking for an informed opinion (that would require a reference page and citation in text). I just want your honest, thoughtful opinion on something that intrigued you, connected with your life, or clarified some behavior you have witnessed.

Your topic determines the following covered:
Physical development for this age group.
Cognitive development for this age group.
How all the systems work together for this age group.

Discussion Points:
There are three basic structures in programming – sequence, selection, and loops.
Discuss the use of each structure.
Provide an example of each.

Discussion Points:
As part of your programming experience, you will need to develop your skills in working with data types and declaring variables.
Explain the concept of a variable and a constant.
Explain the differences between variables and data types.
Explain the need for data types and the different types available.
Describe the general process of declaring a variable (You may use an example as part of your discussion).
Explain the concept “Boolean.”
(if-then-else structures and if-then).
Provide an example you used in Python to illustrate this process.
Note: Python is weak typed language (dynamic language). Python does not support directly “Constant” or “Datatype”, the same variable can be used to store all data types.

Scholarship information:
Produce a 700+ word article describing the challenges we must address in the future to ensure the prosperity of
the worldwide bee population and why you think their survival is key to a better future.

At D-Tek Live Bee Removal, we realize that our fate will be formed by those who are visionaries. During this moment in history, modern environmentalists from all over the earth are realizing the need for research, improving the means to understanding environmental changes, honey bee population and what the bee population demise means to humankind.
We meet many motivated individuals with great visions, unrivaled resolution and an earnest passion to improve our earth for the better. Potential like that should be supported, strengthened, and nurtured till it evolves to transform our society, positively affecting our way of life. At D-Tek Live Bee Removal we want to provide these enterprising individuals with an opportunity to support their aspirations.

Application information
Fill out the form and include your article as an attachment with the title “Preserving Our Future Scholarship Opportunity” and include your name. Include D-Tek Scholarship Essay in the subject of your message and submit. Or you may also email to scholarship@dteklivebeeremoval.com with the following information:
-Name (first and last):
-Address:
-Phone number:
-School Email Address (with .edu):
-Current school:
-Name of the school you’ll be attending
-Field of study:
-Ingenious article as an attachment (word format or google doc link)

Review the details of your assessment including the rubric. You will have the ability to submit the assessment once you submit your required self-assessments and engage with your Faculty Subject Matter Expert (SME) in a substantive way about the competency.
Overview
In this Performance Task Assessment, you will locate different sources of evidence based on your PICO question and appraise each one. You will also evaluate your PICO question based on the research and decide if modifications need to be made.
Submission Length: 2 appraisal worksheets and a 3- to 5-page paper
To complete this Assessment, do the following:
Be sure to adhere to the indicated assignment length.
Access the following:
EP4003_Assessment_QualitativeAppraisalGuide
EP4003_Assessment_QuantitativeAppraisalGuide
EP4003_Assessment_SystematicReviewAppraisalGuide
EP4003_Assessment_PracticeGuidelineReviewAppraisalGuide
During this performance task, you will use the PICO question that you drafted in EP4002 to evaluate published research related to the topic.
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the SME will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.
Rubric
All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring.
Your response to this performance task should reflect the criteria provided in the rubric and adhere to the required length. This assessment requires submission of three (3) files, an approved research evaluation paper (3-5 pages) and two completed resource appraisal worksheets. Save your files as follows:
Save the research evaluation paper as EP4003_res_ firstinitial_lastname (for example, EP4003_res_J_Smith).
Save the complete resource appraisal worksheets as EP4003_App1_firstinitial_lastname and EP4003_App2_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EP4003_App1_J_Smith).
You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.
Important Note: As a student taking this Competency, you agree that you may be required to submit your Assessment for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted Assessment materials will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such materials. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Usage Policy posted on the Turnitin.com site.
Evaluating Research
In this assessment, you will summarize and appraise research related to the PICO question that you wrote in EP4002. You may choose any combination of qualitative, quantitative, systematic review, and/or practice guideline resources for a total of two different resources. Collect what you believe to be the most relevant resources by using an effective combination of search terms, search parameters, and a systematic search process. In order to demonstrate competence, you must collect evidence from reputable sources, including health science databases, databases maintained by nonprofit international organizations for health practitioners, and databases supported by professional specialty organizations in the health field. Refer to the resources in Module 1, Learning Activity 1, “Searching for Evidence” for ways to assess databases, information about conducting effective searches, and names of some of the databases that are relevant to evidence-based nursing practice.
After you have selected the two resources related to your PICO question, complete the performance task assessment using the following prompts:
Resource Appraisal: Complete the corresponding appraisal worksheet for each of the resources selected. This will guide you to not only find credible and reliable resources, but also synthesize the information. Note: That there are different appraisal worksheets for the different types of articles, so be sure that you choose the worksheet that corresponds to the resource you select.
Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment.
Part 1 (3-4 pages)
Write a summary of each article or resource and describe how each one relates to your PICO question.
Identify the level of evidence in each article and describe the relative strengths and applicability of the study to your PICO question by using the AACCN hierarchy of evidence.
Synthesize the evidence from both articles into a statement that supports your PICO question.
Describe any additional evidence that you think will be necessary to support your PICO question.
Finally, describe any gaps in the literature related to the PICO question.
Part 2 (1 page)
Based on the literature search, appraisals, and synthesis, defend either by keeping your PICO question the same or making changes. If you will make changes to the PICO question, provide the new version

Given the problem described and the Situation, what is the
strategic objective or objectives the company should pursue? ½ page
Strategic alternatives – Develop at least two alternatives
that would achieve the objectives. The alternatives should be completely
independent of one another and each should fully address the problem. 2 pages
Alternative Evaluation – Discuss the pros and cons of both
alternatives. ½ page
Alternative Choice – Pick the most tenable solution from the
two alternatives and explain why it is the best option compared to the
alternative solution. ½ page
Strategic Alternative Implementation Develop a set of
actions and an action plan to implement your chosen alternative. 1 page

Multimodal Presentation Proposal
ENGL 1111, Hibbard
The multi-modal assignment is a way to share your work with a different audience in a different format. My intent is for all the students to be able to see each others’ work, but not as a formal essay. Your presentation can be a) a letter to the editor; or b) a poster or brochure. You will use the SAME research and the SAME ideas as you did in your essay, but you will present them in a different format. NO POWER POINTS.
Your presentation will be graded on how well you reimagine and communicate your research in the new format. You should NOT do any additional research for this assignment. Clearly, you won’t be able to present everything in this assignment that was in your essay, so you will need to think about what would be most useful and interesting for your target audience to know about your research. In a separate file, you should also clearly cite the specific information and sources you used in your letter or brochure.
For this proposal, please answer the following questions as best you can (I know you may not have all the answers at this point, but the proposal is meant to push you to think about and plan the presentation in advance):
1. What is your research question from your essay?
2. What format are you using for your multimodal presentation? What draws you to this format?
3. Who do you intend as the primary audience for your presentation? What about your presentation might appeal to this particular audience?
4. Which research resources from the essay do you plan to use in your presentation? Provide citations below. What are some specific facts and ideas from the essay that you plan to feature in your presentation?

Discussion Points:

1. Do you consider Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter and LinkedIn forms of disruptive or sustaining technologies? What is meant by Business 2.0? How is it different from e-business?

2. What are some of the benefits and challenges associated with e-business and Business 2.0? What strategies would you recommend to business to help mitigate these gaps or challenges?

3. Can you leverage any information learned this week and incorporate that research into your term paper (if you’ve selected a topic)? If not, what topic are you leaning toward and why?