Best Writer

As Strategic Partners to the business, HR professionals are expected to develop and implement HR strategies and programs that align with and support their organization’s strategy and goals. From the required courses to the electives, the courses you’ve completed are designed to prepare you to function effectively as a strategic partner. Now, we want you to demonstrate (again) that you can deliver strategic HRM and help drive business outcomes.

Instructions for the Preparation of the Critical Article Review
I. The Critical Article Review: The purpose of a critical article review is twofold. The reviewer wishes, first, to inform the reader as to the nature and scope of the article under consideration. More important, the reviewer seeks to present an evaluation of the article. In so far as is possible, the review should be objective; it should be an evaluation based upon evidence and examples presented in the review and not upon such subjective criteria as personal likes and dislikes.
II. Reading the Article:
A. Begin with questions in your mind: Who wrote the article? Is he/she qualified to write on the subject chosen? What is the article about? Why did the author write the article? Does the article have a thesis? Does the title reveal the author’s attitude toward his/her subject? If you ask yourself these and other pertinent questions before you begin to read, you will be in a good position to evaluate the article.
B. Read the introduction. Valuable clues to the author’s purpose and/or thesis may be found there.
C. Read the body of the work carefully, noting important passages.
III. Evaluation. While reading the article, attempt to identify the author’s thesis – a thesis is an argument supported by evidence put forward by the author. Once you have found the thesis, you must decide for yourself if it is valid. You must, in other words, discover what the author is trying to say and, then, evaluate what is said. In so doing, you may find the following questions helpful:
– What is the subject and scope of the article?
– How thorough is the author’s treatment of his subject?
– What kind of sources (primary or secondary) does the author use?
– Does the article treat the subject in detail or in general terms?
– In what sort of style (i.e. popular, elegant, pedantic) is the article written?
– Is the article well organized and constructed?
– When was the article written?
– Is it the most recent in the field?
IV. Preparing to Write the Review: Once you have read the article and found its thesis or purpose, and once you have evaluated it, you are ready to write your review. Having decided on the point your review will make (i.e. this is a sound, well-documented, and carefully written article or this article is so poorly researched and so badly written that the publisher should not have wasted good paper on it or this is a fascinating article but it lacks the evidence to support the thesis-and so on). Write an introductory paragraph containing the title and author of the article, a sentence about the author, a brief description of the article’s contents, and an indication of what your review will say. The following two or three paragraphs (i.e. the body of the review) will probably contain a statement of the author’s argument, an evaluation of its validity, and the answers to such of the above questions as are pertinent to the article. When you have finished the review – an absolute maximum of five typed (or the equivalent in long-hand pages) – write a concluding paragraph in which a summary of your review’s most important points is made.
V. Citation. At the top of the first page of your review, give a full citation for the article read.
LaSalle, Peter. “Conundrum: A Story about Reading.” New England Review 38, no. 1 (2017): 95–109.
VI. A Few Points and Guidelines:
An article review discusses the main themes of an article, states the author’s thesis (main point), describes the author’s sources (evidence), assesses the author’s use of the sources in arguing the thesis, and compares the author’s work with other articles on the same subject. If an article review offers an opinion on the merits of the article, it does so on the basis of the author’s stated objectives, not on the basis of the reviewer’s biases.
The word “critical” in “critical analysis” does not mean that you are obligated to produce an unfavorable review, nor that you should be disparaging in your remarks. It means that you should use critical reading skills to ask yourself what the author’s objective is, what the author’s thesis is, and how the author has used his or her sources to construct an argument using evidence that is persuasive. In the final analysis, has the author persuaded you–the reader–to agree with his or her interpretation of history?
Like every good piece of writing, your article review should be constructed with an introduction, the main body of the text (several paragraphs) in which you develop your analysis, and a conclusion.
VII. Formatting:
When writing a Critical Review paper you should have this general framework:
Introduction (providing a framework and focus for the rest of your paper). Introductions should clearly identify the article and begin the process of explaining the main point in the article. You should also provide a clear transition to your more in-depth analysis/criticisms of the article at the end of this paragraph. It should establish your thesis and objectives in the paper; thus, it should not be a thoughtless formality but rather provide the context for the more detailed explanation and analysis in the main body of your paper. Essentially, it should tell me what the article is doing and what your paper is going to say about the article.
Main Body. The main body of the paper consists of your detailed explanation of the article and overall critical analysis of the work. You should explain, develop, and expand upon the ideas and themes you set up in the introduction.
Summary/conclusion. Summarize and reiteration – essentially, tell me what you said about the article and its ideas and give your final assessment of the article.
Tip: You might find it useful to begin in the main body of the paper, write to the end, compose the summary and then write the introduction last – it may make for a stronger opening in many cases if you do it that way.
Papers should be formatted properly and reflect what you have learned about formatting in Comp. 1.
Double Space
1 inch margins
11 or 12 point font
3 to 4 pages in length, or 750 to 1000 words when printed double-spaced and in 12-point font.
Heading with name, date, assignment, etc.
Submitted in document compatible with eLearn system (.docx, .pdf, etc.)
If you want to include citations from the article you are reviewing, use quotation marks for the citations and insert page number on which the citation appears in parentheses immediately afterwards. If you choose to cite works other than the article you are reviewing, you should use the appropriate conventions of historical scholarship for footnotes and include a bibliography. A useful guide in this respect is Mary Lynn Rampolla, A Pocket Guide to Writing in History, 3rd ed. (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2001).
Common mistakes to avoid:
Do not write an exclusively narrative, descriptive paper. Most of your paper should consist of your explanation, analysis, and criticism (both positive and negative) of the ideas in the article.
Avoid merely paraphrasing what the article says. Strive to conceptualize, analyze, and explain rather than just restate what the article says.
FOCUS ON THE ARTICLE ITSELF. Don’t use the article as a source and a way to talk about the topic that the article covers. Your job is to explain what the article says and the point it is making about the past. Likewise, your analysis should be of the article and its conclusions. Tell me what you think of the author’s interpretation of the events he/she describes and why you came to that conclusion.
USE YOUR OWN WORDS AND IDEAS. Avoid lengthy quotations from the article. Don’t quote or paraphrase the textbook. Compose in your own words what you find to be relevant in terms of the thesis stated in your introduction. If you do quote the text be sure to explain exactly what the text is saying and why it is important to the main point of your paper. Don’t let a quote make a point for you.
Avoid the passive voice. Nothing makes a paper more tedious to read than an over use of the passive voice. Try using active verbs and different sentence structures to enhance your writing. (Ex: The boy was excited. He went to the park. Instead: In his excitement the boy ran to the park.) Now this does not mean that you should never use the passive voice as it is sometimes necessary to do so. However, you should strive to make your writing as engaging as you can.
Other hints:
History is a literary genre; therefore, to write correctly and effectively is important. Your papers should be well organized, clear, concise, and use correct grammar and syntax.
Avoid awkward, vague, and meaningless statements. Select your words carefully and make sure they convey the meaning you want. PROOFREAD your paper when it is finished and correct typos and misspellings. (Note: points will be deducted for an excessive number of grammatical errors) Above all, get involved in your paper and try to be persuasive and to maintain the interest of your reader.
Speaking of your reader, a note about the audience of the paper. Do not assume that I am the intended audience. If you do, you are likely to leave out information which you know because you might assume that I know it. Write for someone who is an intelligent reader but who has never read the article.
Remember that the details cannot speak for themselves. You must speak for them by showing how they are connected to the main points in the article or what you are saying about it.
READ THE ARTICLE!!! It is impossible to write intelligently about something you have not read, so the first step in your paper writing process should be reading.
Get a head start. Don’t put off working on your papers until the last minute. Good ideas take time to develop and all papers can benefit from numerous revisions. Moreover, you are likely to have many assignments going besides the ones in this class and that is especially true for the final paper at the end of the term. The more you get done on your papers early the more time you will have to work on assignments for other classes due at the same time.
Finally, write your own papers to the best of your ability. Do not have someone else write it for you — that is cheating. Do not copy someone else’s ideas or written work — that is a form of cheating called plagiarism. You are expected to use your own writing, thinking, and rhetorical skills, and to improve these as a result of your writing experience in this class. Your ideas, thoughts, critiques are important – that is what I want to have the pleasure of reading. Show me what YOU know and what you are learning.
Before you begin writing your article review, you should take a look at some examples of good reviews. I suggest you look at The Historian, a journal published by Phi Alpha Theta, the History Honor Society. Reviews are always published at the back of the journal. History majors or graduate students in History wrote many of the reviews you will read there. You are expected to follow the general format of the reviews. You are not expected to meet their level of sophistication.
Articles of historical scholarship are not works of fiction. They are described as “non-fiction” and are interpretations of events and phenomena in the past. Historians “argue” their case. They make claims and assertions about the past, but most historians do not claim to be able to “prove” what happened in the past. You should therefore avoid the words “prove” and “proof.” You should also avoid referring to actors in the past as “we.” “We” are actors in our own time, but we could not act before we were born. Once you have properly identified actors in the past, the appropriate pronoun to use is “they.”

Analyze the OIG report on ICE compliance applicable to detention facilities and submit a report summarizing and discussing key findings and develop and submit a root cause analysis explaining both the occurrence of these findings and how proposed recommendations would mitigate the risk of noncompliance. Limit your response to not more than 750 words (excluding the word count for in text citations and references). However, students may write longer submissions, if necessary to improve their work product.

Compose a one-page double-spaced essay that discusses the value added for each deterministic and probabilistic method. Which methods provide the most value?

Please read the following article: Link (Links to an external site.)
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122250/ (Links to an external site.))
Answer the following questions in a 300-500 word essay:
1) Define plagiarism in your own words.
2) How can you prevent plagiarism?
3) Please describe the consequences of plagiarism in college ?
4) What is the difference between intentional and accidental plagiarism?
5) Do you agree with the consequences of plagiarism, why or why not?

Overall Assignment & Appropriate References:
Each student is required to submit a research paper.
The paper must be based on peer-reviewed references i.e. professional journal articles or books (a minimum of 5 resources) which describe problems, needs, or intervention practices designed to serve a particular client group.
Any resources used that are not peer-reviewed articles, professional books, government data sets, etc. or otherwise listed in the references section of these guidelines will result in a deduction of points.
Due date:
The research paper is due in Module 7. The optional rough draft is due in Module 6.
The exact due date can be found in your syllabus and on Blackboard.

Select a target group: children, teenagers, pregnancy, elderly or diabetic and relate health, wellness, nutrition, diet and oral health and write a minimum of 3 body pages or more, that explores the topic. Search for 2 peer reviewed articles, and “My Plate” dietary guidelines published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Type your paper and follow the APA guidelines for in text citations and the references you located in your research.
You will need to cite a minimum of 3 resources from your research – cite resources other than your text. You will need to utilize correct grammar, sentence structure, paragraphs, punctuation, etc. Proofread your paper, have a classmate read your paper, read it out loud to someone, and lastly work with the student success center if you need assistance with writing.

Directions
Please complete the following assignment on a Word document and submit it. Thoughtfully address each of the five scenarios/questions, please use complete sentences, proper spelling, and grammar.
You Be the Officer: Searches Based on Probable Cause
Are exigent circumstances and probable cause sufficient for the officer to search the vehicle without a warrant or their consent? If you believe not, how do you propose an individual be handled while a warrant is being sought from a judge?
Assume the officer asks the vehicle’s driver for permission to search the vehicle, and consent is given; what is the officer’s next move? Instead, assume the driver of the vehicle refuses to give the officer permission to search the vehicle; what action(s) can/do you believe the officer then legally take?
Assume the officer, with or without a warrant, locates the stolen stereo equipment inside the vehicle under the driver’s seat; can the officer then arrest only the vehicle’s driver, or should all other occupants be arrested as well? Why or why not?
Following the arrest of one or more of the occupants, can they then be searched? Why or why not?
What other issues (e.g., his/her safety) arise for the officer once an arrest is made of one or more of the occupants?

Analyze if a theory is supported by research using three articles, taking into consideration the research methodology of those articles.
As you work on this assessment, you’ll have the opportunity to explore problem solving, creativity, judgments, decisions, and reasoning, and what can prevent people from making quick decisions. You’ll also explore what might account for how people learn differently. What differences might account for how they deal with decisions?
Overview
In this assessment, you’ll have the chance to evaluate peer-reviewed articles in more depth while applying a theory to learning. You’ll analyze if a theory is supported by the research. This is also an important skill for Assessment 3, where you’ll need to use articles to support an evaluation of conditions and treatments.
Preparation
Select at least three articles provided in the Resources and review them. For this assessment, you will write a research paper in the broad topic of individual differences in one of these sub topical areas:
Learning styles.
Multiple intelligences.
Artificial intelligence.
Use the APA Paper Template [DOCX] to complete this assessment:
Review and select at least three of the articles listed in the Resources to inform your paper. You do not need to locate additional articles, although you may use sources that are not included in the provided reading lists.
Follow the assessment instructions to organize your paper using APA style in-text citations and a reference list (see below).
Important: Prior to submission, conduct a self-evaluation of this assessment using the scoring guide and identifying the proficiency level for each criterion. Submit your assessment and the self-evaluation (as a separate attachment). See below for more instructions.
Use the following as a guide for organizing your paper:
Introduction (1 paragraph).
Description of the theory, model, or phenomenon (2-3 paragraphs).
Examples of how the theory, model, or phenomenon impacts learning and memory processes using the peer-reviewed articles you located to inform the examples (2 paragraphs).
Description of the research methods used in the sources cited and analysis of their appropriateness (2-3 paragraphs).
Strengths and limitations of the theoretical perspective or phenomenon (1-2 paragraphs).
Summary and conclusion (1-2 paragraphs).
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Resources: Use your course resources and at least three peer-reviewed and scholarly resources (no more than five years old).
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
Template: Use the APA Paper Template [DOCX] for your paper.
Length: 3-4 typed, double-spaced pages, excluding the title and reference pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Self-Evaluation
When you have finished, write a separate, one-page self-evaluation of your work compared to the scoring guide criteria.
Ensure that you have completed all assessment requirements (ideally at the Distinguished level).
Evaluate your performance using the criteria in the scoring guide.
Compare and contrast your self-evaluation from the previous assessment with the feedback provided by your faculty to align your personal evaluation with faculty expectations.
Indicate the proficiency level you met for each criterion.
Include the scoring guide (including comments) with your self-evaluation.
Submit the self-evaluation as a separate attachment when you submit your assessment.
You may find the Self-Evaluation Tool helpful in guiding you through this process.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Apply psychology theories and concepts to human learning and cognition.
Describe a theory, model, or phenomenon that impacts learning and memory processes.
Apply examples to illustrate how a theory, model, or phenomenon impacts learning and memory.
Competency 3: Describe the research methods used in the study of human learning and cognition.
Describe the research methods used in the sources cited and analyze their appropriateness.
Competency 4: Analyze theory and research to solve problems and inform professional behavior in human learning and cognition.
Describe strengths and limitations of the theory or phenomenon.
Competency 5: Apply metacognitive strategies to self-assess performance quality.
Conduct a self-evaluation using established scoring criteria and identifying the proficiency level for each criterion.
Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Apply current APA style, including in-text citations and full references for sources.

An effective way to learn about human behavior is through observation. It is one of the oldest methods of data collection. What aha moments about observation did you have while watching the Module 3 video presentation, Ethnography: Ellen Isaacs at TedX Broadway?

What has been your experience with observation as a data collection instrument?
Provide at least one example from your professional experience.
Will observation play a role in your concept paper? Why or why not?