Write My Paper

Write a research paper outlining the significance of evaluation in group work practice.Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Social workers understand that evaluation is an ongoing component of the dynamic and interactive process of social work practice with, and on behalf of, diverse individuals, families, groups, organizations and communities. Social workers evaluate processes and outcomes to increase practice, policy, and service delivery effectiveness. Social workers apply anti-racist and anti-oppressive perspectives in evaluating outcomes. Social workers understand theories of human behavior and the social environment, as well as interprofessional conceptual frameworks, and critically evaluate and apply this knowledge in evaluating outcomes. Social workers understand qualitative and quantitative methods for evaluating outcomes and practice effectiveness. Social workers:

a. select and use culturally responsive methods for evaluation of outcomes; and

critically analyze outcomes and apply evaluation findings to improve practice effectiveness with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.

The Signature Assignment in SWK 522 requires students to demonstrate the knowledge and skills to select and use culturally responsive methods for evaluation of outcomes, and to critically analyze outcomes and apply evaluation findings to improve practice effectiveness with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.

Students will write a 8-10-page paper in correct APA style, with a cover page and reference list (not included in page count), to use an existing, or develop a hypothetical evaluation plan for group practice. Students must use a minimum of four appropriate sources that include a combination of scholarly (journal articles, reports, etc.) and other trustworthy sources (.org, .gov, and .edu organization websites *.com websites must be very carefully evaluated since .com stands for ‘commerce’).

Required Assignment Headings

Introduction

Group Identification and Descriiption

History

Clients

Intervention/Treatment Model

Intervention

Logic of Intervention

Evidence

Cultural Considerations

Developmental Appropriateness

Ethics

Plan for Evaluation of Practice

Informed Consent

Evaluation Ethics

Methodology

Evaluation Design

Data Collection

Measurement Instrument

Application of Evaluation

Evidence Based Practice

Service Delivery Outcomes

Conclusion

References

Preparation and Professional Writing (40 pts)

· APA Format and Sources (20 pts)

o Title page

o Reference page

o In-text citations match reference page

o Sources are appropriate

o Times New Roman 12-point

o 1” margins

o Page numbers

o Headings

o Paper length (8-10 pages)

· Writing (20 pts)

o Spelling

o Word usage

o Grammar

o Sentence structure

o punctuation

Group Identification and Descriiption (35 pts)

· Students will identify and give a brief descriiption of the group they chose for their Proposal Paper. (5 pts)

· Students will research the group and describe:

o A history of the group including all of the following (10 pts):

§ How it began

§ Who formed it

§ When it was started

§ Why it was started

§ Whether it is formal or informal

§ Whether it is a chapter of a larger organization

o A descriiption of the client(s) served through the group process that includes the criteria for member inclusion and exclusion (10 pts)

o A brief descriiption of the treatment or intervention model used within the group (students will expand on this in the next section) (10 pts)

Intervention (50 pts)

· Students will provide a critical analysis, using scholarly evidence to support their work, to describe:

o the logic of the intervention for the group type and clients served including:

§ evidence related to the use of the intervention model in terms of the problem being addressed (15 pts)

§ cultural considerations related to the intervention and population (15 pts)

consider how the intervention upholds or fails to uphold anti-racist and anti-oppressive values
benefits and challenges of working with the intervention population
§ appropriateness in terms of human development (think about different models of human development theories) (10 pts)

§ ethics related to the intervention (must use & cite most current NASW Code of Ethics) (10 pts)

Evaluation of Practice (50 pts)

· Students will choose an evaluation model to create a hypothetical plan for evaluation of the group intervention, which includes all of the following:

o Informed consent process (5 pts)

o A descriiption of the ethics and anti-racist, anti-oppressive values that must inform the process (5 pts)

o Methodology to be used (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed) (10 pts)

o Evaluation Design to be used (i.e., single-subject case design, between groups comparison, pre-test/post-test, etc.) (10 pts)

o Process of data collection (10 pts)

o Descriiption of the measurement instrument to be used (survey, interview, observation, etc.) including how it aligns with the evaluation design (does the instrument make sense given the evaluation design) (10 pts)

It is best to stick with one measurement instrument
Application of Evaluation Findings (25 pts)

· Students will think critically about how the results of the evaluation plan will inform practice effectiveness considering each of the following:

o evidence based practice (how data from evaluation might inform future practice with diverse populations) (12 pts)

o service delivery outcomes (how data from evaluation might improve or change outcomes with diverse populations) (13 pts)

Write a research paper on the topic of “Natural Disaster Emergency Public Investment under the Carbon Emissions DEA Model in Central and Southern China.”

Write a research paper addressing the question, “Is the movie The Colour Purple based on a true story?”The review should be written in first person an exuberant tone, conversational vocabulary including slang and primarily simple sentences structure. 3 to 5 paragraphs. Also make it like I wrote it no copy and pasting. This is a open form review no need to elaborate introduction or a conclusion that re states your main point

Write a research paper that explores the topic of vulnerable populations in a chosen community paper and idea map.Identify one vulnerable population within a selected community. Explore current literature and related data to better understand the variables that place this population at risk for health concerns and health disparities. Analyze national health directives (such as Healthy People or another national initiative) to determine correlation with needs/risks/disparities of the vulnerable population.

Part 1: Concept Map

Identify the following elements to include in the concept map.
Vulnerable population
Variables (risk factors) that place the identified population at risk (minimum of three)
Minimum of one health risk or disparity for which the population is at risk
2. Create a concept map that portrays each element and the relationships between the vulnerable population, variables placing the population at risk, and the identified health risk or disparity for which the population is susceptible. The concept map must be your own, original work.

Part 2: Summary Paper

In a 1–3 page paper, address the elements listed below. Include a minimum of four scholarly sources, current within 5 years, to support your work. See the rubric for specific, required content criteria within each section of the paper.

Provide an introduction to the paper.
Include a succinct descriiption of the vulnerable population identified, a minimum of three variables that place the population at risk, and the identified health risk(s) or disparity that the population is at risk of experiencing. Explain how the concept map portrays the relationships between each element:
Vulnerable population
Variables that place the vulnerable population at risk (minimum of three)
Health risks and disparities for which the population is at risk (minimum of one)
Identify one national population health goal or objective that relates to the identified risk or disparity (such as Healthy People or another national initiative). Propose one strategy for advanced nursing practice to collaborate at the local, state, or national level to advocate for the health of the vulnerable population and advance the Healthy People goal or objective that is identified.
Provide a conclusion to the paper.
Assignment Instructions

Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
Part 2: Summary Paper—using Microsoft Word, create the written paper for this assignment.
Sources older than 5 years may not be used without the permission of the class instructor.
Title page, pagination, subheadings, body of paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the most current edition of the manual.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the most current edition of the APA Manual.
No more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) may be used in this assignment.
First person should not be used within this assignment.
Please note: If you do not receive a proficient rating in any major content category, you can re-submit your assignment with revisions in those content categories to receive a better grade. You have one additional opportunity to revise after the initial submission in order to make improvements. The initial submission must be a complete paper; rough drafts will not be graded. All revisions must be submitted no later than Sunday of Module 7 at 11:59 p.m. (You cannot revise your graduate-level writing style for a higher grade in that category.).
Assignment Criteria

Assessment Criteria

Points

%

Descriiption

Part 1: Concept Map

30

20%

An original, student-created concept map is submitted that portrays/meets the following.

Vulnerable population
Variables (risk factors) that place the vulnerable population at risk (minimum of three)
Health risk or disparity experienced by the vulnerable population (minimum of one)
Interrelationships between each required element
Submission guidelines are followed
Part 2: Summary Paper
Introduction

15

10%

This section includes the following.

Overview of the concept of vulnerability
Identification of a vulnerable population to be examined
Identification of the sections of the paper
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Part 2: Summary Paper
Concept Map Overview

39

26%

This section includes overview of the concept map that was created, including all of the following elements.

Descriiption of the vulnerable population
Explanation of variables that place the population at risk (minimum of three)
Population health-related risk or disparity experienced (minimum of one)
Discussion of interrelationships between the elements as portrayed on the concept map
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Part 2: Summary Paper
Implications for Advanced Nursing Practice

36

24%

This section includes the following.

Proposal of one strategy for the MSN-prepared nurse to advocate for this vulnerable population at the local, state, or national level
Explanation of how the proposed strategy aligns with the one national population health goal or objective related to the identified risk or disparity (such as Healthy People or another national initiative)
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Part 2: Summary Paper
Conclusion

15

10%

This section includes the following.

Concluding statements regarding relationships between risk factors and vulnerability
Concluding statements regarding the role of MSN-prepared nurses to advocate for vulnerable groups
Graduate-level Writing Style

15

10%

Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure
Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing
Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person
Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less)
Correct APA format for the following:
Page numbering
Font style and size
Margins and spacing
Headings; subheadings
Citation and referencing sources
Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
Quality of Literature Support

It is an expectation that a minimum of four scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are integrated within the assignment.

If the above expectation is not met, 3 points shall be deducted.

Assignment Length Criteria

It is an expectation that the paper is a minimum of 1 page in length, and a maximum of 3 pages (not including the title or reference pages).

If the above expectation is not met, 3 points shall be deducted.

Total

150

100%

A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements.

Rubric
Module 4 Assignment Vulnerable Population Guidelines and Rubric (1)
Module 4 Assignment Vulnerable Population Guidelines and Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 1: Concept Map
30 pts
Distinguished presentation of an original, student-created concept map as evidenced by all of the following elements.
• Vulnerable population • Variables (risk factors) that place the vulnerable population at risk (minimum of three) • Health risk or disparity experienced by the vulnerable population (minimum of one) • Interrelationships between each required element • Submission guidelines are followed
27 pts
Presentation of an original, student-created concept map exceeds expectations evidenced by most content included but with one area where coverage is superficial.
• Vulnerable population • Variables (risk factors) that place the vulnerable population at risk (minimum of three) • Health risk or disparity experienced by the vulnerable population (minimum of one) • Interrelationships between each required element • Submission guidelines are followed
25 pts
Proficient presentation of an original, student-created concept map as evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas.
• Vulnerable population • Variables (risk factors) that place the vulnerable population at risk (minimum of three) • Health risk or disparity experienced by the vulnerable population (minimum of one) • Interrelationships between each required element • Submission guidelines are followed
0 pts
Concept map is not the student’s original creation. Or Original, student-created concept map needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas.
• Vulnerable population • Variables (risk factors) that place the vulnerable population at risk (minimum of three) • Health risk or disparity experienced by the vulnerable population (minimum of one) • Interrelationships between each required element • Submission guidelines are followed
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 2: Summary Paper Introduction
15 pts
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner.
• Overview of the concept of vulnerability • Identification of a vulnerable population to be examined • Identification of the sections of the paper • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
13 pts
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial.
• Overview of the concept of vulnerability • Identification of a vulnerable population to be examined • Identification of the sections of the paper • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
12 pts
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas.
• Overview of the concept of vulnerability • Identification of a vulnerable population to be examined • Identification of the sections of the paper • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
0 pts
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas.
• Overview of the concept of vulnerability • Identification of a vulnerable population to be examined • Identification of the sections of the paper • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 2: Summary Paper Concept Map Overview
39 pts
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner.
• Descriiption of the vulnerable population • Explanation of variables that place the population at risk (minimum of three) • Population health-related risk or disparity experienced (minimum of one) • Discussion of interrelationships between the elements as portrayed on the concept map • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
35 pts
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial.
• Descriiption of the vulnerable population • Explanation of variables that place the population at risk (minimum of three) • Population health-related risk or disparity experienced (minimum of one) • Discussion of interrelationships between the elements as portrayed on the concept map • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
32 pts
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas.
• Descriiption of the vulnerable population • Explanation of variables that place the population at risk (minimum of three) • Population health-related risk or disparity experienced (minimum of one) • Discussion of interrelationships between the elements as portrayed on the concept map • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
0 pts
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas.
• Descriiption of the vulnerable population • Explanation of variables that place the population at risk (minimum of three) • Population health-related risk or disparity experienced (minimum of one) • Discussion of interrelationships between the elements as portrayed on the concept map • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
39 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 2: Summary Paper Implications for Advanced Nursing Practice
36 pts
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner.
• Proposal of one strategy for the MSN-prepared nurse to advocate for this vulnerable population at the local, state, or national level • Explanation of how the proposed strategy aligns with the one national population health goal or objective related to the identified risk or disparity (such as Healthy People or another national initiative) • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
33 pts
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial.
• Proposal of one strategy for the MSN-prepared nurse to advocate for this vulnerable population at the local, state, or national level • Explanation of how the proposed strategy aligns with the one national population health goal or objective related to the identified risk or disparity (such as Healthy People or another national initiative) • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
30 pts
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas.
• Proposal of one strategy for the MSN-prepared nurse to advocate for this vulnerable population at the local, state, or national level • Explanation of how the proposed strategy aligns with the one national population health goal or objective related to the identified risk or disparity (such as Healthy People or another national initiative) • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
0 pts
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas.
• Proposal of one strategy for the MSN-prepared nurse to advocate for this vulnerable population at the local, state, or national level • Explanation of how the proposed strategy aligns with the one national population health goal or objective related to the identified risk or disparity (such as Healthy People or another national initiative) • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
36 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 2: Summary Paper Conclusion
15 pts
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner.
• Concluding statements regarding relationships between risk factors and vulnerability • Concluding statements regarding the role of MSN-prepared nurses to advocate for vulnerable groups
13 pts
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial.
• Concluding statements regarding relationships between risk factors and vulnerability • Concluding statements regarding the role of MSN-prepared nurses to advocate for vulnerable groups
12 pts
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas.
• Concluding statements regarding relationships between risk factors and vulnerability • Concluding statements regarding the role of MSN-prepared nurses to advocate for vulnerable groups
0 pts
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas.
• Concluding statements regarding relationships between risk factors and vulnerability • Concluding statements regarding the role of MSN-prepared nurses to advocate for vulnerable groups
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Graduate-level Writing Style
15 pts
Distinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total.
• Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following. o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
13 pts
Graduate-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 2-4 errors total.
• Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following. o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
12 pts
Proficient graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 5-7 errors total.
• Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following. o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
0 pts
Graduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 8 or more errors total.
• Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) • Correct APA format for the following. o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Literature Support
0 pts
0 Points Deducted
A minimum of four peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are integrated within the assignment.
0 pts
3 Points Deducted
The assignment fails to meet the requirement noted for quality of literature support.
0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Length Expectations
0 pts
0 Points Deducted
The length of the assignment meets the criteria: Minimum of 1 page in length; maximum of 3 pages in length (not including title or reference pages)
0 pts
3 Points Deducted
The assignment fails to meet the requirement for length.

Write a research paper with speaker notes that discusses health policy and a power point presentation on population health risks or disparities.

Select one health policy that addresses a population health risk or disparity. Policies to consider may be at the unit, organizational, community, local, or state level.

Determine the purpose and intended impact of the policy. Assess the congruence of the policy with current national population health goals and objectives (such as the Healthy People initiative, or another national initiative). Based upon your analysis, consider recommendations to further address the health risk or disparity, as well as interprofessional opportunities to enhance health outcomes.

In a 10–14 slide PowerPoint presentation, address the elements listed below. Include a minimum of four scholarly sources, current within 5 years, to support your work. See the rubric for specific, required content criteria within each section of the presentation.

Provide an introduction to the presentation.
Describe one health policy that relates to an identified health risk or disparity. Summarize the intended impact of the policy on the risk or disparity and discuss ethical implications regarding the policy.
Examine the policy within the context of a national population health initiative and determine the degree to which the policy is congruent with that national population health goal and/or objective. Explain your findings.
Propose one strategy to further address the health risk or disparity and discuss opportunities for interprofessional collaborative practice related to your recommendation.
Provide a conclusion to the presentation.
Assignment Instructions

Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create the presentation.
Each slide (excluding title and reference slides) must include detailed speaker notes.
The purpose of the speaker notes is to expand upon the idea and document facts and information about the bulleted information points on the slide.
Formal, scholarly writing style with complete sentence and paragraph structure should be used to create the speaker notes.
Scholarly literature support should be integrated within the speaker notes.
Speaker notes assure that all assignment expectations and key points are covered.
Within the speaker notes, the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the most current edition of the APA Manual.
First person should not be used for this scholarly assignment.
Citation and referencing of sources must be congruent with guidelines noted in the most current edition of the APA Manual.
Slides are professional in appearance with visually balanced text, font is appropriate for audience reading, bulleted points are succinct, and there is visually appealing contrast between the background and font utilized. Correct spelling and appropriate use of graphics/images are evident.
Sources older than 5 years may not be used without the permission of the class instructor.
Please note: If you do not receive a proficient rating in any major content category, you can resubmit your assignment with revisions in those content categories to receive a better grade. You have one additional opportunity to revise after the initial submission in order to make improvements. The initial submission must be a complete paper; rough drafts will not be graded. All revisions must be submitted no later than Sunday of Week 7 at 11:59 p.m. MT (You cannot revise your graduate-level writing style for a higher grade in that category.).
Assignment Criteria

Assessment Criteria

Points

%

Descriiption

Introduction

20

10%

This section includes the following.

General statements regarding the role of health policy to influence population health
Discussion regarding the importance of health policy to address the identified health risk or disparity
Identification of the sections of the presentation
Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Health Policy Analysis

40

20%

This section includes the following.

Identification and descriiption of a health policy
Descriiption of the intended impact of the policy on health risk or disparity
Discussion of ethical implications regarding the policy
Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Alignment with National Population Health Initiative

30

15%

This section includes the following.

Congruence of the policy with a national population health initiative (such as Healthy People or another initiative)
Explain your appraisal regarding the level of congruence that is noted
Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Recommendation for Enhancement

50

25%

This section includes the following.

Recommendation of one strategy to further address the health risk or disparity
Explanation of how the strategy would be implemented
Discussion regarding opportunities for interprofessional collaborative practice related to the recommended strategy
Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Conclusion

20

10%

This section includes the following.

Concluding statements regarding the impact of health policy on population health
Succinct summary of policy analysis and recommendation proposed
Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section
Graduate-level Writing Style

20

10%

Graduate-level writing style is included, evidenced by integrating the following standards.

Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure within the speaker notes
Correct use of spelling and word usage on the slides
Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas and information on speaker notes and slides
Alignment between information on slides and speaker notes
APA format (most current edition) for citing and referencing sources
Congruence with APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
No direct quotes are used within the assignment
First person is not used within the presentation slides or speaker notes
Graduate-level Presentation Style

20

10%
Professional presentation is created, evidenced by the following.

Slide design includes visually balanced text
Slide design provides contrast of color between background and font used
Succinct, key points are presented on the slides
No lengthy narratives are included on the slides
Font size appropriate for audience viewing (sized 18 or larger)
Use of graphics and/or images is professional and appropriate for the topic
Quality of Literature Support

It is an expectation that a minimum of four scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are integrated within the assignment.

If the above expectation is not met, 4 points shall be deducted.

Assignment Length Criteria

It is an expectation that the assignment is a minimum of 10 slides and a maximum of 14 slides in length (not including the title or reference slides).

If the above expectation is not met, 4 points shall be deducted.

Total

200

100%

A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements.

Discuss the Principles of Macroeconomics.

Prepare a written response of the High-rise design.

Write a research paper on the topic of “Higher Education Institutions” and mass shootings involving firearms.The final project for this course is the creation of a research paper.

The landscape of higher education is constantly changing to respond to internal and external factors such as shifting demographics, federal and state government regulations, state funding, educational system changes, and costs. These factors produce both planned and unplanned changes in the higher education organization, which, in turn, impact students, employees, and organizational health. To be effective leaders, higher education administrators must be astute in recognizing, naming, planning for, and responding to these changes that impact the sociotechnical, structural, and cultural systems of university organizations.

For the final project, you will create a research paper on a contemporary national issue addressing the current shifts and changing role of higher education in the twenty-first century. You will analyze the historical and current impact of the issue and associated trend on higher education institutions, using empirical data to illustrate how and why the trend impacts higher education institutions now and in the future. You will conclude your research paper by reflecting on the impact of the issue on your personal educational and professional experiences and pursuits.

The project is divided into three milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two, Four, and Six. The final submission will be due in Module Nine.

In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

Analyze the evolution of current trends and issues in the field of higher education through the use of empirical data
Assess the use of technological approaches for how they can improve achievement amongst underrepresented students in higher education institutions
Analyze the relationship between contemporary issues influencing higher education and educational institutions’ missions, visions, and goals
Determine the impact of contemporary issues influencing the field of higher education on decision-making trends in higher education institutions
Analyze the current and projected impacts of contemporary issues on twenty-first-century students and professionals in the field of higher education
Prompt
Your research paper should answer the following prompt: You will begin your project by selecting a contemporary issue that is addressing current shifts and the changing role of higher education in the twenty-first century. Specifically, you must select an issue that is influencing technological trends in the field. Your instructor can assist you in your selection of an issue. Once you select an issue, you will analyze the evolution of the issue and its modern impact on higher education institutions. To analyze the modern impact of the issue on higher education institutions, you will use a sample of two institutions. You will create this sample by randomly selecting higher education institutions across the nation to study. You will then base your analysis on this sample, drawing conclusions about the trends in the institutions and the impact on the institutions as a whole. To conclude your research paper, you will narrow your focus of the issue to reflect on the personal impact, thinking about your student and/or professional experiences in higher education.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

Historical Analysis: To begin, you will analyze the evolution of your selected issue and associated trend.
Describe your selected national issue influencing the field of higher education and the trend associated with the issue.
Analyze how the selected national issue has evolved throughout history, identifying key influential factors and events and supporting your analysis with evidence.
Analyze how the associated trend has evolved throughout history, identifying key influential factors and events and supporting your analysis with evidence.
Institutional Impact: In this section, you will analyze the institutional impact of your selected issue using a sample of higher education institutions. You will create a sample by selecting two higher education institutions across the nation, identify themes throughout the sample, and analyze the impact of the issue on this sample to inform your conclusions.
Describe common themes in the missions, visions, and goals of the institutions and explain how the identified issue impacts each institution’s ability to deliver on its mission, vision, and goals.
Describe the relevant state and federal policies that impact the missions, visions, and goals of the institutions with respect to the issue and describe the impact of these policies.
Describe the role of technology in the institutions in relation to the issue. Support your descriiption with evidence. For example, is technology used to assist in curriculum delivery or student access?
Define the student demographics in your selected sample of higher education institutions. Specifically, what groups are underrepresented, and how does this compare to national trends?
How can technology be used to improve student achievement for the previously identified underrepresented students? You might consider technology as a tool to deliver curriculum.
Determine the impact of the issue on program offerings. What assumptions are you making about the institutions’ decision-making processes? Support your conclusions with evidence. For example, has the issue influenced institutions to offer specific programs?
Determine the impact of the issue on funding. What assumptions are you making about the institutions’ decision-making processes? Support your conclusions with evidence. For example, has the issue influenced institutions to enact new policies around funding, or have sources of funding changed?
Determine the impact of the issue on student outreach. What assumptions are you making about the institutions’ decision-making processes? Support your conclusions with evidence. For example, has the issue influenced institutions to organize specific student activities or outreach strategies?
Conclusion: Now that you have analyzed the impact of the issue on the field of higher education, you will reflect on the impact of the issue on your student and/or professional experience.
Explain how your selected issue has personally impacted you as a student and/or professional in the field of higher education. For example, as a student, the issue may have impacted your access to education or the delivery of curriculum, or as a professional, the issue may have impacted your ability to fund your specific programs.
Describe how you might attempt to address the issue if you were a high-ranking professional in a higher education institution, explaining your rationale. Consider state and federal regulations that may impact your decision making.
Analyze the mission, vision, and goals of an institution where you have experience, either as a student or employee, for how the institution addresses your selected contemporary issue. For example, are there gaps among the mission, vision, and goals and the selected issue?
Based on your analysis, predict the future direction of the issue and its impact on you, either as an aspiring professional in the field of higher education or a professional currently in the field. For example, how might the issue continue to evolve, and how will this impact your professional pursuits?
Milestones
Milestone One: Timeline
In Module Two, you will submit a visual timeline illustrating the evolution of your selected issue and associated trend. This timeline should show the progression of a contemporary issue from its origin to its current state, illustrating all the watershed events that led to the issue’s current state. Be sure to provide enough explanation within the timeline so the audience can follow the information from beginning to end. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric.

Milestone Two: Presentation
In Module Four, you will submit a presentation about the relevant state and federal policies that impact the missions, visions, and goals of the two sample institutions you have chosen, with respect to the issue. Also, describe the impact of these policies on the sample institutions. You may use any type of software application to create your presentation, such as Microsoft PowerPoint or Prezi. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.

Milestone Three: Article Analysis on Technology in Curriculum and Teaching
In Module Six, you will submit an article analysis. Critically analyze a research article that focuses on your chosen contemporary higher education issue related to technology in curriculum and teaching. Determine the impact of the issue on student outreach. Additionally, discuss how technology can be used to improve student achievement for underrepresented students.

The research article must be taken from one of the following top-tier, peer-reviewed journals: Research in Higher Education, Review of Higher Education, Journal of Higher Education, or Peabody Journal of Education and Teaching. An article analysis is the basic format of a literature review for a single article. Select an article from top-tier, peer-reviewed journals and discuss the type of research, the research question, and the strengths and weaknesses of the article’s impact on the subject. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Three Rubric.

Final Submission: Research Paper
In Module Nine, you will submit your research paper. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Product Rubric.

What to Submit
Your research paper must be 6–8 pages in length and must adhere to standard formatting (Times New Roman, 12-point font, one-inch margins), using the most recent version of the APA style manual for citations.

In regards to choosing two institutions to compare mission statements, goals, and visions one school that is definite is Michigan state University you can choose the other school to find similarities.
She wants to know about the history of gun violence and mass shootings and how technology help impact it in a positive way. Please use empirical data.