Best Writer

This week’s Critical Thinking assignment is based on the articles, “Views of Technology Links to an external site.”, and “Technology and Social Justice Links to an external site.” (Links to an external site.). Begin your paper by briefly describing Barbour and Dyson’s ideas about freedom and social justice, particularly as they relate to technology. Then choose a technology with which you regularly interact. You can use the same technology you used for the Module 2 Critical Thinking assignment or a different technology.

In your paper, identify potential ways in which your chosen technology can be used either as a means of enabling participation, or as a contributor to social justice, or both. Be sure to provide detail and use examples to support your assessment of the technology’s potential.

You are asked to produce a report, which consists of three activities:
Section 1. Please provide a detailed critique of at least two well-used research methodologies.
Section 2. Please construct a research instrument that could be used to collect data in your capstone project.
You will not be collecting any data – just designing the tool.
Section 3. Please reflect upon the audience and critical aspects of research dissemination in the specific
context of your potential research findings and outcomes from the developed instrument.
Should you fail the assessment on the first attempt and be referred to retake the coursework, only the failed
individual elements will need to be reworked, with 10% of the re-sit mark awarded for an additional reflective
statement demonstrating how you learnt from the feedback and what you did differently the second time.

The final report should be submitted via Moodle to a turn-it-in box and will be graded according to the following
marking criteria (see more instructions of the writing of above sections outlined under “Structure and
presentation” below):

Section 1 – Clarity and justification of
research problem
10%

Section 1 – For the literature analysis,
breadth and depth of explored research
with a clear focus emerging
15%

Section 1 – Critique of two specific
research methods
40%

Section 2 – Demonstration of the proposed
research instrument’s potential for new
knowledge generation and rigour in
deduction of conclusions
10%

Section 3 – Comprehensive appraisal of
research dissemination requirements
15%

All sections – Form and presentation 10%
(this section only for main submission)

Applies to re-sit only – Reflective section
marked instead of “Form and Presentation”
10%

WRITING ASSIGNMENT 2
After reading Chapter 11, The Congress, write an essay by answering/analyzing all of the following questions/topics. See this Sample American Government Writing Assignment for guidance with your assignment. (Click on the hyperlink to access the sample assignment.)
Why did the Founding Fathers establish a bicameral Congress? Be specific about the two reasons.
What are the main functions of the Congress? Be specific and give an example for each function.
How does a bill become law? Be specific about the steps in the lawmaking process.
In order to receive credit, you are required to:
See this Sample American Government Writing Assignment for guidance with your assignment. (Click on the hyperlink to access the sample assignment.)
Provide comprehensive answers/analysis by using the textbook (the assigned chapter) as the primary source of information.
Penalties for not following this requirement will range from 5% to 30%.
Divide the essay into paragraphs following each assigned question or topic.
Penalties for not following this requirement will range from 5% to 15%.
Submit your essay in at least 500 words.
Penalties for not following the length requirement will range from 5% to 50%.
Submit the assignment within the due date.
See the Late/Make-up Assignment policy in the syllabus for information about late submission penalties.
Provide in-text citations and references in the APA writing format.
Each in-text citation needs to include the last name of the author(s), the publication year, and the page or section and paragraph numbers. Here are examples of in-text citations: (Krutz and Waskiewicz, 2019, p. 27) or (Krutz and Waskiewicz, 2019, Section 3.1, para. 5) or (Krutz and Waskiewicz, 2019, 3.1, para. 5).
Penalties for not providing in-text citations and/or matching references will range from 10% to 50%.
See the videos below for specific information on how to provide in-text citations and references.

MPORTANT:

All essays will be submitted in the assigned drop box.
All essays will go through the Turnitin software for plagiarism check. An originality report will be released to you minutes after making the submission.
Use the following link to learn how to check the report.
How To Retrieve a TurnItIn Report
You are required to avoid using unnecessary quotes.
A quote is usually used when the same idea can’t be stated differently or when doing so may diminish its academic value. This is rarely the case in our undergraduate class.
In-text citations are required
Penalties for not complying will range from 5 to 40 points.
Plagiarism will not be tolerated. A failing grade for the assignment and/or the course will be awarded pursuant to the SPC Academic Integrity Policy. (https://go.spcollege.edu/AcademicHonesty/)
In addition to the aforementioned requirements, see the Written Assignment Grading Rubric for additional information about your assignment grade. (Find my comments under the grade/score that corresponds to yours.)

The idea is to first summarize, in your own words, the main points of the article; the summaries should be like an extended abstract of the article. Next, in your evaluation section, you should explicitly state why you agree or disagree with some particular key aspect of the article while using historical concepts or analysis you have learned in the course lectures and readings. You are expected to make a minimum of 10 separate points related to course concepts and readings. As such, the evaluations are your opportunity to show what you are learning in the course and are meant to replace the need for exams. If you choose to, you are allowed to work in pairs on your article assignments. If so, you must indicate who you are working with, as a comment, when you both submit your work. Each pair will receive the same grade.
Quoting from articles is strongly discouraged because it does not show understanding; you should only quote when you feel you have a very specific reason to retain the wording of a particular claim made by the author, which is very unlikely. If you feel you must specifically refer to an article mentioned in one of the articles upon which your assignment is based, which although unlikely is at least conceivable in the evaluation section, you can use a secondary citation (e.g., Driver-Linn, 2003, as cited in Buss, 2020).
Because the assignments are based on a single article, there is also no need to continually cite the article. There is still, as always, an urgent need to put the article in your own words and to avoid any appearance of plagiarism. Note as well that providing a citation after a statement you make in your assignment does not mean that you do not need to paraphrase the content. Finally, sources from outside the course are not allowed because the evaluations are meant to show your understanding of course concepts and readings.Quoting from articles is strongly discouraged because it does not show understanding; you should only quote when you feel you have a very specific reason to retain the wording of a particular claim made by the author, which is very unlikely. If you feel you must specifically refer to an article mentioned in one of the articles upon which your assignment is based, which although unlikely is at least conceivable in the evaluation section, you can use a secondary citation (e.g., Driver-Linn, 2003, as cited in Buss, 2020).
Because the assignments are based on a single article, there is also no need to continually cite the article. There is still, as always, an urgent need to put the article in your own words and to avoid any appearance of plagiarism. Note as well that providing a citation after a statement you make in your assignment does not mean that you do not need to paraphrase the content. Finally, sources from outside the course are not allowed because the evaluations are meant to show your understanding of course concepts and readings.

Follow an APA format. Create a Title page and use headings for your five-paragraph essay. At least include two citations from the Miami Regional University Library database to defend your supporting paragraphs. Once you upload a file (a word document) from your computer, make sure that you scroll down and hit the submit key. Do not forget to include a reference pageFollow an APA format.

How did each of the revolutions–American, French, Haitian and Latin American–advance the concept of “freedom” and “liberty” for the world? Which of these revolutions offered a vision of “liberty” that is the most progressive?

Here is a video about the revolution in Venezuela/Colombia (called Gran Colombia) to help with that portion. But the ebook also discusses the indendence in Latin America as well FYI…

Lecture notes

A film about the Haitian revolution

A film about the French revolution

A film about the American revolution

Write a paper that is approximately 2-pages in length (1 page for each part) and utilize the APA writing style including a title page, in-text citations, and a reference page. Answer the following questions:

Part 1. Describe in detail the due process and the crime control models of our criminal justice judicial processes. Highlight differences between these competing values.
Part 2. Discuss and compare civil and criminal law proceedings. Include in your response the variances between the proof necessary and the punishments administered.

Assignment Content
Technology is an integral part of life–including the lives of young children and their families. NAEYC’s position is that technology and media can indeed support development when used wisely and in a developmentally appropriate fashion. Your task? Find and evaluate a website, online game, or app and review all of its sections and tabs. Then create a family friendly guide for this tech review, this can be a rubric, rating scale, or checklist using the information listed below
Rubric/Rating Scale Components:
1. Introduction- What elements of this site/game/app align with preschool or
Kindergarten school readiness goals? Are these goals, in turn, aligned with developmentally appropriate practices? (Think about active learning and developmental domains)
Review these articles to better understand the guidelines for using technology in early childhood
https://www.naeyc.org/resources/blog/technology-supports-early-learninghttps://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/position-statements/ps_technology.pdf
1. Evaluate: Give feedback on each section. What is done well with this part of the site/online game/app? What could be changed or fixed for better accessibility for young children (i.e. fine motor skills, cognitive development)?
2. Use:How user friendly is this site/game/app?
Would an adult/child be able to use all of the sections? When would it be used? At home?
Teacher-directed time? Free choice? One-on-one learning?
3. Multicultural: What are the multicultural/multi-ethnic concepts in this site/game/app? How culturally appropriate is this component of this site/game/app? What might be added, modified, or removed, and why?
4. Sounds:Give examples of the site/game/app that foster emergent literacy skills, such as print concepts, phonological awareness, decoding, and language.
5. Safety/ Security: review the apps privacy settings, adds, in app purchasing, and restrictions on device and internet usage
6. A statement sharing your thoughts about the use of technology in a young child’s learning environment, is also required.

As learned in this week’s reading and videos, it is critical that employees be assigned specific roles during an organizational change process. Employees want/need to feel included in organizational change. This will allow for open communication during the change process. Leaders should assign roles during these change initiatives.

You are the leader of your department and want to develop a plan to present to your employees and to assign roles for an upcoming change in operating systems. The roles to include in your written plan are listed below. Use these roles as section headers in your written plan. Each section should have 2–3 paragraphs dedicated defining each major role.

Change Manager
Sponsor
Change Agent
Change Target
Change Advocate

Students will choose an injury and do a case study following an athlete who suffers this chosen injury. The case study will consist of three parts:
i. On field care – identify the process to approach, assess and determine the athletes’ injury status and ability to play (or not) including emergency procedures (be specific: specify sport, position, willingness to move, support techniques required/used, etc.)
ii. Clinical assessment and initial treatment – present the process for thoroughly assessing (in the clinic) the injury to the patient and a thorough outline of the initial treatment of this patient for the first 2 weeks following their injury – (in SOAP note format). Research new and innovative treatment options that are evidence based and reliable for your injury. Provide references to support your treatment choices.
iii. Ongoing treatment and return to play – present the process for ongoing treatment (weeks 3-5) and return to play for this athlete. Research treatment options for your specific injury. Evidence-based practice is the most appropriate, so ensure you have good evidence to support your treatment choices. Explain why you think this is a good treatment plan for your athlete.