Best Writer

After reading chapter 18 and reading the linked YAWP readings, consider the following:
What is monopoly, and what were the primary arguments both for and against it?
What do you think Henry George means when he says of income inequality: “…these evils are not imposed by natural laws; that they spring solely from social mal-adjustments which ignore natural laws, and that in removing their cause we shall be giving an enormous impetus to progress.”?
How do William Graham Sumner and Andrew Carnegie differ on their responses to the extreme economic inequality of the late 1800s?
How does Carnegies version of civilization compare to yours?
Do you agree or disagree with Carnegies words: Neither the individual nor the race is improved by almsgiving (charity). Why?
What would Lucy Parsons’s response be to these men?

(LO3) Identify techniques and tools that can be used to research the feasibility of an entrepreneurial venture
Prompt:
This week we ask you to research and explore a potential entrepreneurial venture you may be interested in undertaking at some time in the future. Provide us with the name of your proposed business as well as a mission statement and vision statement. Please take some time to select a business venture that you are interested in as we will ask you to work on this venture throughout the course and it will be the subject of your final paper.
A vision statement focuses on tomorrow and what an organization wants to ultimately become. A mission statement focuses on today and what an organization does to achieve it.
Mission statement questions look like:
What do we do?
Whom do we serve?
How do we serve them?
The vision statement is about what you want to become. Its aspirational.
Vision statement questions look like:
What are our hopes and dreams?
What problem are we solving for the greater good?
Who and what are we inspiring to change?
After you have read and absorbed the lesson material this week, head into the library and internet and locate information regarding the products or services to analyze the potential for the venture, and to begin analyzing the potential for this business and developing the vision and mission statements. Use the Word template attached to complete this assignment and for all following essays. Complete all citations and references utilizing APA 7th form and style
Instructions:
This assignment only needs to be 3 to 5 paragraphs long but we would still like to see APA formatting including citation and referencing where necessary.
This assignment is due on Day 7 of Week 3, by 11:59pm ET.

USE the paper I submitted at the bottom all that goes together

the course if engineering design, concept is improving sustainability of the cat food pouch – in a nutshell, bit it’s looking at how cat food pouch recyclability can bi improved by either stripping layer of print on it, or reducing the size, or changing the seal etc – thats where i’m struggling and need to develop fast

End-of-module assessment
1 Submitting your EMA
The EMA is the examinable component for T452 and is compulsory.
You should submit your completed EMA to arrive no later than 12 noon (UK local time) on the cut-off date. Please refer to the study planner on the T452 website for the cut-off date.
The EMA is a compulsory component of the overall assessment and carries 50% of the marks for the module. You need to pass both the continuous assessment and the EMA to complete the module and gain credit for it.
To be sure of passing T452 you must achieve at least a pass grade of 40 on the EMA as well as an average of 40 on your continuous assessment.
Your EMA will consist of three sections: your project report, your project poster and your process review section. For the process review section, there will be different questions to be answered depending on which qualification you are following. Please read the guidance carefully in Section 4.
The assessment will be based on the learning outcomes and so the markers will be considering how well you have demonstrated:
competence in the use of the principles and conventions of project management and execution
that you can solve problems in developed technologies using well-proven analytical techniques
a successful application of your engineering knowledge to deliver a project using established technologies and methods.
In addition, your key skills will be assessed by considering how well you have:
executed a literature review supporting your project
produced a written technical report and a poster presentation on your specialist topic
reviewed what you have done critically, analysing your learning and skill development.
The assessors will use the following guidance to grade the achievements of the learning outcomes:
Mark range Grade (assuming the student has done equally well on the TMAs) Descriptors of the likely achievement of the learning outcomes
85100 1 Predominantly well achieved
7084 2 Mixture of achieved with some higher
5569 3 Mixture of achieved with some lower
4054 4 Predominantly just achieved
3039 borderline fail Mixture of just achieved with not quite achieved
1529 fail Mixture of not quite achieved and not achieved
014 poor fail Predominantly not achieved
Some limited feedback on your performance in each of these learning outcomes will be provided after the results have been issued.
T452 uses the online TMA/EMA service for submission of the EMA. To submit your EMA, please go to your StudentHome page and follow the link(s) provided. The file size limit for your eTMAs is 10 MB each.
Your EMA will be marked by two markers and will need to be submitted on or before the submission cut-off date.
2 Project report (80 marks)
Word limit: 6000 words maximum
This is the culmination of your engineering qualification where you will bring together your learning across the different modules that you have taken. You will have submitted reports and part reports throughout the modules of your qualification so it is expected that you will be able to show that you have developed a professional approach to communicating technical information.
Use the A4 paper size for your project report and put your name, your personal identifier, the module code and Project report at the top of every sheet.
Your report must be formal in nature, so be sure to look at the types of report given in the ebook by Bowden (2011) and adapt them to suit your purpose.
The markers of your project report will want to know the full story of your project. So ensure that you include enough narrative to explain what you set out to do by describing your proposal, what you actually did in your activities and what you found in your results and conclusions. These sections must all be supported by your reasoning and evaluation.
Why did you select your aims? What persuaded you to adopt your methods and what do your results tell us about the engineering question you set out to answer? The requirements of your report will include strict word limits so it will need to be efficiently written.
This means that you must report in a technical style, concentrating on the engineering that you did. Remember, this is about how you perform as an engineer. While your work in TMA 02 will contribute to your EMA, you need to take care in how you use it. The TMA parts are not directly transferable to the EMA. The EMA, apart from requiring additional work, also needs to comply with a formal report structure. Take care to ensure your sections actually address what they should. For example, your summary should give a brief description of what your project was about and what was concluded. It is not an introduction.
What you will need to do is imagine you are addressing a particular audience. It may be your senior management. It may be a technical committee or, if you are involved in product design, a group providing financial backing needing to understand the technical detail of the product. They will want to know answers to the questions you have set yourself and by reading your report they expect to find them. However, they will also require a formal technical or technological document.
Markers will also be judging the presentation of the report as well as the quality of the English. So make sure you pay attention to spelling, grammar and punctuation.
General guidance for writing the project report
Central to all your project work are the engineering questions that you set out to answer in your proposal. These need to be described as part of the context of your report. You will have done some of this work in TMA 02; now is your opportunity to respond to the feedback and refine their descriptions.
Similarly, you will have started describing what you did in TMA 02 and now you can report on the work you have carried out since TMA 02.
The new sections which are needed for your final report are:
your results
your discussion and evaluation of these results
your conclusions.
You will also need to arrange your references and appendices in a suitable form (see the Study guide). Finally, please ensure that your report complies with the standards expected in professional engineering. For example, have you used sufficient graphical content to explain your work?
Your report will be assessed using the marking scheme below.
What the report must cover
You must make sure that your report addresses the three questions that follow. It is your choice as to how you divide your report into sections, but you are expected to follow one of the variants of a technical report. This is an important distinction. Your report must look and read like a technical document.
For examples of types of reports, look at the ebook by Bowden (2011). It is likely that your project would be best presented by one of the technical/technological variants given in Part 3.
Plan
What was intended to be done and why? (10 marks)
You should include:
an updated version of your aims from TMA 01 these may have altered as your project evolved, and this is acceptable
a description of the context of your project, including a brief background showing why there is a need for the work you have carried out in your particular project. You will use some of the work you did for Question 2 of your TMA 02, suitably refined and updated.
a clear technical explanation of your aims
a short response to the TMA 01 feedback you received from your tutor and Internal Examiner.
Do
What was done, how was it done and why? (35 marks)
You should include:
an updated version of your literature review which you drafted for Question 3 of TMA 02 and how your evaluation of the literature shaped your methodology
a description of the particular approach you decided to use for your work
a report of the activities that you undertook as you worked through your project. This will build on the work you did for Question 3 of TMA 02.
Be careful not to write just a narrative for this last point, so avoid I did this, then I did that. Your activities need to be described in technical terms and backed up by engineering judgements. It is important, for instance, that you indicate key stages of your project. You should identify what these were and justify the decisions you made as a consequence of work done during each stage. If you changed your aims, you should say so here and include your reasons.
Explain your decisions
Ensure that you include sufficient detail for your markers to be able to follow how and why you arrived at your outcomes. For example, where you have responded to feedback from your tutor and Internal Examiner, your decisions should be indicated and explained.
Review
What were the outcomes of your work and what was your evaluation of them? (25 marks)
It is here that you are expected to show your engineering understanding. Be clear about the methods you used and how well they worked. This needs to be a critical process, reflecting on the limitations and accuracy of the techniques used.
You should include:
your technical results and conclusions
an evaluation of the results
any supporting information that is better in the report itself, rather than in an Appendix (see the information about appendices below).
Length
Your report needs to be no more than 6000 words with the number of marks as a guide, e.g. 10 marks represents around 10%, so 600 words. Marks will be deducted for going over the word limit: this can be a penalty of up to 10 marks, so ensure you stay within the word limits specified.
State the number of words at the end of your report. If you fail to do this, you will lose marks. You will also be penalised if your report deviates significantly from the stipulated word length.
Structure
As a wide range of subjects as well as contexts are covered by T452, there are several ways of presenting your technical report. You need to research the possible formats and then discuss them with your tutor.
However, as a minimum your report should have:
an appropriate title page
a one-page summary
an introduction
literature review, methodology and process
an evaluation of the results
a discussion leading to your conclusions
a list of references (and possibly a bibliography) along with any acknowledgements
appendices (see below) and, if necessary, a glossary.
As the word limits are tight, please consider using diagrams and other graphics to describe your work. They are an important and efficient means of engineering communication.
Clarity, style and use of English
Your report should be written in a clear style and be grammatically correct in its use of English. This is worth up to 10 marks of the 80 available for the project report. When thinking about the audience for your report, remember that the readers will not only be your tutor, but also someone else who may be unfamiliar with your work to date. You are advised to imagine you are writing for someone who is at a similar stage of study as yourself. It is important that your report is written in a formal style, so the use of the first person is not generally appropriate. Please be aware of the effect of poor layout by thinking about font, spacing and margins. Guidance on these details is given in the Study guide.
Use of appendices
Appendices should be used for those elements that might distract the reader from the main narrative. For example:
lengthy or detailed tables
calculations, test cases and results
user and technical documentation
derivations of standard formulae
details of standard procedures.
The total number of pages in your appendices should not be greater than the number in your actual report. You should not include appendices which have not been referred to in the main text.
Tutor feedback
You must include the feedback given by your tutor and the Internal Examiner for TMA 01 in the appendices. This is because you will need to refer to them in your main text.
Extract important information
The assessors will award marks for the main text of your report and your use of the appendices as supporting evidence. This means that they are not expected to read your appendices thoroughly, and so you should extract important results or summaries of important results from them and include these in your main text. If you do not do this, or do not reference them clearly, you cannot assume that the assessors will see them.
Plagiarism
If you take material from an Open University module or elsewhere and incorporate it into your answer word for word, you must indicate where you have taken it from. Not to do so is termed plagiarism and is regarded as an infringement of copyright. To attempt to pass off such work as your own is cheating.
You must therefore acknowledge all your sources of information. You will find further guidance at Referencing and plagiarism. On that page is a link to a guide on developing good academic practice.
Additional marking criteria
When your tutor and a second assessor mark your EMA they will consider the work you are writing up and the report itself. In no particular order of importance, they will look for:
absence of errors, particularly conceptual errors
fluency of write-up and variety of presentation of information
awareness of context of work
depth and substance of project work
independence while doing the work
integration of ideas in the report
originality of work
application of concepts from your related OU level 3 module.
Be aware that independence while doing the work does not mean that you should never contact your tutor far from it. There is, however, a difference between regularly consulting your tutor and expecting him or her to supply you with ideas or prompt you when to do particular tasks.
3 Project poster (10 marks)
Imagine you are going to a conference of experts and students in the field of your project. At this conference you have to present a poster that summarises your project. Your poster will be displayed in a public area and should be legible from a distance of about 1 metre. As a rough guide, presume a reader will spend no more than five minutes reading it. You should present your work on a poster, for display in an area of up to 1 square metre.
Posters at a conference are used to describe work in progress or completed work. It is vital to communicate the current state of the work and any significant results and milestones. Your poster might include:
a description of some completed work
the main outcome
the route to the outcome
the value of the outcome
an indication of related future work.
It should:
be visually attractive with diagrams, graphics, and so on
be viewed as an integral item
not include references.
Your project will have been lengthy and you wont be able to cover all the detail on a single poster. You will need to be selective about what material you choose to display, and how you communicate your ideas effectively. It should be possible for someone familiar with the field to read your poster and understand your work and its results without further explanation.
There are a number of ways of creating your poster but remember that it will need to be submitted electronically. Using a series of Word files with graphical images is a possibility as is a digital photo of a hard copy poster.
Marks
Of the 10 marks for this part, 5 are for the content of your poster and 5 are for layout and presentation.
4 Process review (10 marks)
Word limit: 600 words maximum
The question which you need to answer in this section depends on your qualification.
BEng (Hons) Q65
What have you learned from doing a project? (10 marks)
This final part of your report is asking you to reflect on the project by looking back over your project and asking yourself:
how your skills have changed
how your skills now match with UK-SPEC (Engineering Council, 2014).
Using the work you did in the iCMA, where you identified those Incorporated Engineer competences which are relevant to your project, critically assess your development of those competences.
BEng (Hons) top-up Q78, BSc Design and Innovation, Q61, Open degrees, QD
What did you think of your work? (10 marks)
This final question is asking you to reflect on the project by looking back over your project and asking yourself, for example, what you would do differently next time. Whereas your report and poster deal with the technical part of the project, this section is about the process.
You should include:
a discussion of how successful you were in what you set out to do
your opinion of the value of what you did for example, in relation to the field of study or to you personally
an evaluation of your project methods and approach.
Both these questions are asking you to be reflective about the work that you have undertaken. It is therefore appropriate for you to adopt a more personal tone and use the first person in your answer.
References
Bowden, J. (2011) Writing a Report: How to Prepare, Write and Present Really Effective Reports, 9th edn [Online], Constable & Robinson. Available at https://www.open.ac.uk/ libraryservices/ resource/ ebook:497748&f=28184 (Accessed 01 September 2015).
Engineering Council (2014) UK-SPEC: UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence [Online], London, Engineering Council. Available at https://www.open.ac.uk/ libraryservices/ resource/ website:104782&f=28184 (Accessed 03 December 2015).

Create a table showing the average breast cancer screening rates by year for both hospitals.
Create a table showing the total and average breast cancer costs by year for both hospitals.
Using one bar chart, display the average breast cancer screening rates by year for each hospital.
Using one bar chart, display the average breast cancer costs by year for each hospital.
For each hospital, use a pie chart to show the percentage of cancer cost contribution by year to the overall 20152017 cancer total costs. Which year was responsible for most of the cancer cost during this period?
Create a visualization to forecast screening rates for each hospital.
Summarize your findings in one paragraph by comparing hospitals breast cancer screening rates. Which hospital needs a change in breast cancer screening policy? Why does this policy change matter to health care?
Compute a correlation statistic to examine the association between breast cancer screening rates and breast cancer costs for both hospitals. Interpret both correlation statistics in terms of direct/inverse association and terms of weak/moderate/strong association. What is your overall conclusion about the relationship between breast cancer screening rates and breast cancer costs? What specific policy recommendations could you provide to the hospital board at Southern Hospital Group?
Create a story with a narrative.
Create a dashboard.

it has been said that life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think. Discuss this idea as it relates to comedy and tragedy and the concept of aesthetic distance. Does either form require more or less aesthetic distance?
Realistic plays were often attacked as disgusting and vile. For example, Henrik Ibsen’s Ghosts which dealt with a serious family secret. Why was this reaction particularly common during the Victorian age when realism began to rise in popularity? Are there bits of life people might not want to see portrayed on stage? Why?
Video: Locate a well known actor interview with a reputable interviewer. YouTube could be very helpful but you will find many sources you didn’t know existed at your local library. Watch the material you’ve found and answer the essay prompt below. Whenever possible follow MLA rules of writing and compose at least three paragraphs. Strunk and White’s “Elements of Style” can also be helpful in constructing your essay. Don’t forget to cite your research at the bottom of your response. You will need three sources including the video interview you selected. Take your time and review your notes from watching the video interview. Essay Prompt: Discuss the actor’s approach to acting. What does he/she do to prepare? What is his/her philosophy on acting? What did you learn about your chosen actor in regards to his/her work?
Discuss the psychology of space: color, space, cleanliness, etc. How do these elements affect your opinion of the person who inhabits a space? How would previous knowledge of the person alter your opinion? Would you react differently to a person’s office that was cluttered and messy if you knew the person was a renowned English professor?
Pick three various forms and sources of light in real life – one natural, one artificial, and one of your choice. What are their qualities? Mood? Color? Intensity? Don’t be fooled by this question. Do a little research on each of your choices so you may write with authority.
Video: Find a video documentary about the theatre at Epidaurus in Greece, still standing today. YouTube could be very helpful but you will find many sources you didn’t know existed at your local library. You will need to look at three different sources including the video you selected. A good one is the UK produced The Greatest Theatre. Watch the material you’ve located and answer the essay prompt below.Whenever possible follow MLA rules of writing and compose at least three paragraphs. Strunk and White’s “Elements of Style” can also be helpful in constructing your essay. Don’t forget to cite your research at the bottom of your response. Take your time and review your notes from watching the video interview. Whenever possible include a link to the video you observed.Essay Prompt: Discuss the unusual features of the Epidaurus, especially the acoustics.

Each blod is independent of each other. Please seperate each response clearly in the paper. I will pay/tip way more than what is estimted due to how soon i need the assignment done. I

Video Blogs-3 paragraphs with 3 sources
Other Blogs- 2 paragraphs

Assignment: Your essay need to have a clear argument that is your own which is made clear in your thesis and supported throughout the text.
I have listed a number of questions to consider, but do not feel as though you must reply to every question. Your purpose in this assignment is to analyze the text in regards to gender (option 1), existentialism (option 2), and war (option 3).
Camus, The Stranger (Synopsis according to Goodreads.com): The Stranger is a tent-pole of existentialism, a philosophy that stresses the importance of humanity in the face of God’s supposed absence. Through the story of an ordinary man unwittingly drawn into a senseless murder on an Algerian beach, Camus explored what he termed “the nakedness of man faced with the absurd.”
Directions: Discuss the novel as it relates to existentialism and colonialism. Define existentialism and explain its place within the novel, and decide if you think this colonial setting is directly related to the existentialism or absurdism in which the novel is often contextualized. Does this existentialism (or absurdismyou can articulate if you think these are different), in your opinion, relate to the protagonist, a Frenchman living in colonized Algiers? What does it mean that the man that Meursault murders is not named, and simply called The Arab? Do you think the titular Stranger is the Arab, or Meursault?

Be sure to support your claims with discussions of the plot, and be sure to refer specifically to the primary text (with no lessthan 8 citations). You are also required to use at least two outside ACADEMIC sources LOG IN TO ARTICLES RELEASED after HIRE.
Reference material (dictionaries, encyclopedias) cannot be used as your academic sources.
Preceding your essay, you must provide an outline of your essay which will be attached on files

Step 1: Leave Comments
You are expected to leave constructive comments for your peer in two places. First, you should leave comments on the document itself. You should use the highlight, text, and comments tools to mark up your peers document with feedback as if you were writing on their paper copy with a pen. Do not focus on little details like writing errors, typos, or APA style. Instead, your comments should focus on the content, making sure to address the following:
Is their introduction paragraph clear? Does it grab your attention?
Is the thesis statement clear, concise, and argumentative? Is it in the correct location as the last sentence of the introduction?
Does the outline seem clearly organized and do all of the body paragraphs relate back to the topic?
Do they have enough evidence to support their argument? Did they use appropriates sources to back up their supporting details?
Does their explanation of evidence make sense and relate back to their thesis?
Guidelines for giving constructive feedback:
Give positive feedback about things done well or liked very much, and explain why.
Give critical feedback with the goal of helping your peer improve the quality of their research and writing.
Use the rubric to guide the important points of your feedback.
Ask questions when you are unsure of your peers thoughts or intent.
Step 2: Leave Summary Comments
Once you’ve completed your mark up of your peers work. Your summary comments must answer the following four questions:
What was the strongest part of their submission?
What aspects of the introduction do they need to work on?
What aspects of their outline do they need to work on?
What did you learn by reading their submission?

Write a research paper about your microbe (Hepatitis B). Make sure you check
your work for proper spelling, grammar, and organization. This should be a formal paper (DO NOT
need to write the paper to your target audience – microbiology classmates). The summary should be written using APA
format and should include at least four scholarly references. One reference MUST include the text (I’ll include this reference later). Rubric is attached.

Create a table showing the average breast cancer screening rates by year for both hospitals.
Create a table showing the total and average breast cancer costs by year for both hospitals.
Using one bar chart, display the average breast cancer screening rates by year for each hospital.
Using one bar chart, display the average breast cancer costs by year for each hospital.
For each hospital, use a pie chart to show the percentage of cancer cost contribution by year to the overall 20152017 cancer total costs. Which year was responsible for most of the cancer cost during this period?
Create a visualization to forecast screening rates for each hospital.
Summarize your findings in one paragraph by comparing hospitals breast cancer screening rates. Which hospital needs a change in breast cancer screening policy? Why does this policy change matter to health care?
Compute a correlation statistic to examine the association between breast cancer screening rates and breast cancer costs for both hospitals. Interpret both correlation statistics in terms of direct/inverse association and terms of weak/moderate/strong association. What is your overall conclusion about the relationship between breast cancer screening rates and breast cancer costs? What specific policy recommendations could you provide to the hospital board at Southern Hospital Group?
Create a story with a narrative.
Create a dashboard.

Paper #3 Prompt

1. Should we, as a society, allow Science to go wherever its explorations take it, leaving it solely to the scientific community to chart its own course? Explain your answer.

2. If we, as a society, conclude that Science may be prevented from going down a certain path, who makes that decision? For example:
Research Scientists?
Practicing Medical Personnel?
Educators?
Philosophers?
Lawyers?
Legislators?
Lay Persons?
Ethicists?
Other?

3. Create an Organization that reviews Scientific Applications, tasked with the responsibility of approving or disapproving the proposed scientific investigations. Using the numbering system below, answer the following:

1. Who are the Members of the Organization (by occupation)?
2. Is this an organization appointed by the Government? If not, by what or whom?
3. Are these decisions made by one individual or by a panel?
4. If by a panel, how many are on a panel and how is the panel composed?
5. What criteria do you suggest be used to grant or deny an application?
6. How might this Organization enforce its decisions?
7. Suggest three different scientific pathways that may be prevented by the above organization.
8. Should the Organization also have the power to instruct the Scientific Community to go down a certain pathway? Explain and if yes, give examples.