Best Writer

In a 1-to-3-page reflective essay, consider how anthropologists study modern media, and consider how you, in your nursing career, see yourself using modern media professionally.
Think critically, as anthropologists do.
First, describe in your essay how anthropologists study modern media.
Then, apply those observations regarding ways anthropologists study modern media and describe ways nurses do or could use modern media professionally.
Describe ways you, as a nurse, could use modern media professionally.
What would be some potential benefits of the use of modern media to the modern nurse?
What would be some potential drawbacks? How might such media use affect the nurse-and-patient relationship?

Assignment Description:
Delegation in Practice

What does your State Board of Nursing say about Unlicensed Assistive Personnel and their role, and the role of the Registered Nurse?
Describe the responsibilities of the Registered Nurse when delegating patient care tasks.

How does the ICU environment differ from a general medical-surgical unit as far as assigned responsibilities for Unlicensed Assistive
Personnel?

The following specifications are required for this assignment:
Length: 750 to 1000 words
Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this
assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.
References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Please
include at least one reference in addition to the textbook.

The Final Paper is composed of two parts: Part I compares/contrasts your two philosophers and Part II takes building blocks from what you have learned to begin your own philosophizing. Follow the instructions for each carefully.
PART I – YOUR COMPARE/CONTRAST, 5 pages minimum, double-spaced
Compare/contrast one of our rationalists to Nietzsche, using either the block or the point-by-point method. For help with each, see the resource, “How to Approach Compare/Contrast Papers”. Regarding “the rationalists”, choose either Descartes or Plato, one or the other, to compare to Nietzsche. Your Synthesis Paper work was designed to help you with this part of the Final Paper. For further support, see the “Final Paper Help Sheet.”
Getting started: the following questions are designed to help you think about what “path” of re-telling the “story” presented in the course material might interest you. These are NOT the questions to answer in your paper.
To develop Part I of your paper, ask yourself:
How does each view metaphysics? How does each view epistemology?
What is their attitude toward objective knowledge? Toward subjective knowledge? Toward truth?
How do they support their “stories”? What are their key concepts and key tools (methods and techniques)?
How do those concepts link together to create their views? How do their tools help them arrive at their perspectives?
What are each of their philosophical assumptions, including their models and frameworks? (See Nietzsche Help Sheets for the tradition’s framework versus Nietzsche’s.)
How would you explain the “whole” of each philosopher’s metaphysics and the “whole” of each philosopher’s epistemology using key terms to “wed” the story together?
From all the information that you gather in answering the questions, along with the work done on your Synthesis Paper Assignment, craft a compelling “story” that compares/contrasts Nietzsche and your chosen rationalist. Do not merely “spew” all you know about each “side”. The information must be organized to resonate together as shown in the example in the Final Paper Help Sheet.
The information as a whole must be building toward demonstrating a greater cohesive comprehension. You do not need to use all the KEY TERMS, but make your selections artfully to help you tell the “story” of these philosophies that most interests you.
Other considerations for Part I
I am not going to require that you reference your knowledge. This places more responsibility on you to express yourself clearly when explaining our philosophers’ views. If it strikes me as “off”, I have no recourse to understand how you might have gotten that interpretation.
If, at certain moments, you would like to ensure that I have that chance, follow the instructions below for referencing: in the body of your paper, make clear the author you are drawing from, and then follow the direct or indirect quote with the page number in parentheses.
Indirect quote examples:
According to Nietzsche, we prefer explanations that are effective at soothing our fears. He also notes that explanations that have been effective in the past can come to be “habituated”: these explanations become our blind habits of perception, shaping our experience of reality without our knowing (62).
To quote course resources, you can write, “As found in the Nietzsche Help Sheets . . .”
Or, you can simply abbreviate it in parentheses at the end: (NHS). Same for the lectures: (L-08).
Direct quote example:
Descartes struggles to guarantee his own existence. He must omit evidence of the senses since they present inaccurate information from time to time. He also considers that there might be an “evil” force making him think he exists when he does not. In this quandary, however, he stumbles upon a “foot-hold” so to speak. He writes, “But [perhaps] there is some deceiver or other who is supremely powerful and supremely sly and who is always deliberately deceiving me. Then too there is no doubt that I exist, if he is deceiving me” (18). Descartes realizes that he cannot disprove his existence with the notion that he is being deceived into thinking he exists. If he is being deceived, then he necessarily exists, at least as something that can be deceived.
If you’re struggling to meet the page requirements, using direct quotes to demonstrate your interpretation of a philosopher is a great way to extend your paper. They are much, much better than adding “fluff”; they strengthen your paper, rather than weaken it. But it is important to NOT merely “staple” quotes into the paper; instead, you must provide context to the quote, and an explanation following the quote.
PART II – BUILDING BLOCKS FOR YOUR INQUIRY, 4 pages minimum, double spaced
In this portion of the paper, you are pulling building blocks from your work in Part I to do your own philosophizing.
Getting started: the following questions are designed to help you think about what cohesive story of your philosophy, specifically theories of metaphysics and epistemology, you can put together for yourself. These are NOT the questions to answer in your paper.
To develop Part II of your paper, ask yourself:
Which aspects of our study caught your attention most?
What value do metaphysical and epistemological investigations have? How can they enhance our lives?
What model do your preferred beliefs assume? (Teleological, Eternal Return, or one of your own making?)
What is your take on objective knowledge (rational and empirical) and subjective knowledge?
For your own “philosophy”, what key concepts and tools do you borrow from the rationalists? What do you borrow from Nietzsche?
What might your “framework” look like compared to the tradition’s and to Nietzsche’s? (Being, Ideals and Death as enlightenment [tradition’s]; Becoming, Difference-itself and Life as information [Nietzsche’s])
What assumptions do you hold about reality? The human creature? About mind? About truth? About knowledge? Use specific terminology (examples: materialism; idealism; Cartesian dualism or the mind-body split; non-composite; and so on).
How have your views grown throughout the term? Since perspectives can change and evolve, I’m hoping that there have been some shifts in thinking for you throughout this term. If so, include them here.
How would you tell a connective “story” about your philosophical views? Do not just spew bits of facts; make them work together to present a cohesive “whole”.
Here, you are also free to reorganize and rearrange the definitions of the philosophical terms and the frameworks we’ve studied, to join concepts that previously seemed opposed and to add components. But how you do so must be demonstrated against the backdrop of what you’ve learned from our readings and course resources. In other words, show how you get from “their concepts” to “your concepts”.
In Part II of the paper, create a perspective of epistemology and metaphysics that is unique to you, but using the work of our studied philosophers as your basis. You have a great deal of creative license here, if you can show your comprehension well in Part I, but above all, your own “philosophy” must be cohesive, it must flow together, rather than sound fragmented and isolated in its parts. It must “culminate” by creating a well-linked “whole” that shows both you and me the organization of your philosophical thinking.

Go to the following website and review the chart, Typical Water Uses at Home.
Water Questions and Answers: https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/water-science-school/science/water-qa-how-much-water-do-i-use-home-each-day
Determine how much water you use in a typical week. Be very specific (use each category listed) and show calculations for you (and if possible each person in your home). Make your calculations and show totals in a spreadsheet. If there is something that you do not do (for example outdoor watering) put Not Applicable on the chart.

After reviewing your spreadsheet, answer the following:
How much water do you (or your family) use in a week, month, year?
How could you save water?
Determine how many people live in your town( 23,501 ). Based on your calculations, estimate how much water your town uses every year (by volume). How does your water use compare with other Americans?

This should be 300-500 words. APA Citations and References required as appropriate.

Research Paper To receive full credit paper must be complete, see Rubric on the Research Paper assignment instruction page.
The Paper must be at least 600 words in length, including a word count at the end of your submission.
Papers must be supported by at least three trustable sources.
Use MLA format, see writing guide.
No plagiarsm
Business Research Paper Suggestions (you may select one of the topics below)
Analyze the leadership style of a current business leader in the news.
Provide an overview of the social responsibility of a company you admire.
Would society benefit from the breakup of large technology companies, Amazon, Google, Apple, and Microsoft, and why.
Explore a recent company crisis in the news and how they addressed it and were they successful.
Globalization is an overall positive or negative for society, and why.
Compare the compensation structure in the US to that of Europe, which do you prefer and why.
Explore and research further a single topic of interest to you that we discussed in our course this semester, e.g., financial management, human resources, crisis management, social responsibility, the economy, marketing, sales, supply chain, entrepreneur, operations, IT, motivation, leadership, or ethics.

Report Brief
Your task is to select a luxury brand and write a report on its strategic development. The brand must be a well established luxury brand. You are required to critically exam the brand’s strategic development by following the
four steps that you have learned in this module. Based on your analysis, you need to draw recommendation(s) for
the luxury brand’s future improvement. Your report should generate an in-depth discussion and it should be
supported by concepts covered in the curriculum and from related academic literature to underline the four
steps.
Your reading material should cover academic journal articles and books. These may be supplemented with
evidence from other source materials (e.g., online material, popular press), and specific examples to illustrate your
points. All source material should be appropriately referenced and included in the reference list.
Marking: Your performance on the assignment will be marked according to the University guidelines. You must
consider the following areas in your assignment as the marks will be awarded accordingly (though not necessarily
equally weighted).
a) Your choice of luxury brand should be available in the market, and there should be enough information
readily available to support your report.
b) The main task of the report is to examine and analyse branding activities according to the four steps in
the strategic brand management process. You can selectively discuss one or more main feature(s) of the
luxury brand for each step.
c) You should provide brief recommendations to state how the luxury brand’s branding strategies could be
improved in the future. Your recommendations, however, should be derived from the analysis featured in
the main task.
d) You should demonstrate your abilities to generate an in-depth discussion, conduct appropriate analysis
and show evaluative skills in the report.
e) The report should be completed in a coherent and consistent manner. Relevant literature from academic
journals should be reviewed. You should also provide a range of evidence for the quality of the critical
evaluation.
Format and Word Limit
A report should be written with a clear purpose and presented with evidence, analysis, and application to a
particular issue. The information should be outlined with a clearly structured format and applied with sections
and headings to ensure it is easy to follow. The main features should follow a report structure, which comprises
an executive summary, introduction, main body, conclusion, and reference.
Each student is required to submit a single-spaced typed report of no more than 4,000 words (excluding tables,
figures, images, content page, executive summary, references, and appendices). Relegating large sections of text
from the main report to appendices constitutes a misuse of the word limit.
Your report should be clear, concise, and well-structured. You should provide labels for any diagrams or tables,
and if they are taken from a particular source, details of that source should be provided. If you have any queries
about the format, please discuss these with your lecturer.

Strategic Logistics Management, Inc. (SLM) is a U.S.-based third party
company whose primary business is to deliver logistics services.
Currently, SLM manages several warehouses in Los Angeles and the New
York/New Jersey area. SLM provides expertise in air and ocean
shipping, customs clearance, forwarding, warehousing, and ground
transportation. Over the past five years, SLM has built a successful
logistics information system (LIS) that includes personnel, equipment,
and technology. The decision-support systems included in the LIS are a
transportation management system (TMS) and a warehouse management
system (WMS).

SLM employs experienced personnel in the United States to handle a
wide range of logistics activities and provide customized logistics
solutions and services. The company is considering expanding their
global operations to provide the same range of services in Australia,
including:

Imports: A network of offices and trade connections to support import
consolidation, provide warehousing of goods prior to customs
clearance, and manage import documentation for customs formalities.
Door-to-door services: Cargo pickup from supplier locations and
transportation of goods directly to the customer, as well as freight
bookings with airlines and ocean lines to handle cargo exports from
both the United States and Australia.
Exports: Handling of various types of cargo exports by ocean and by
air, ensuring the timely movement of goods at the most competitive
rates. Complete export documentation is provided.

SLM is working to secure two contracts in Australia that will go into
effect next year. The first contract is with Greer Wire Company in
Melbourne, Australia, to transport two million pounds of stainless
steel brushfire mesh used in protecting homes in brushfire prone
areas. This cargo will be shipped to Los Angeles, California. The
stainless steel wire mesh is supplied in five-meter rolls with an
outside diameter of 500 mm, and each roll weighs 50 kg.

The second contract is with Brooks Brothers, a clothing company
located in New York City, for warehousing and transportation of
clothing in various sizes of cardboard boxes that easily assemble in
one unit load on a 48-inch by 40-inch pallet. The goods will be
shipped from New York, New York, to Sydney, Australia. For the purpose
of this assignment you can make reasonable assumptions about the
weight of the boxes.

SLM will manage a rapid flow of goods to and from Australia. The
proposed warehouses in Australia will be located in proximity to two
large metropolitan areas, Sydney and Melbourne. In the first year of
its operations in Australia, SLM plans to handle an average of 200
20-foot equivalent units (TEUs) of imports and exports between the
United States and Australia every month.

You are a Logistics Manager at SLM. As part of the company’s goal to
strengthen its competitiveness in the global marketplace, the CEO has
asked you to design a logistics plan for the proposed warehouse
operations in Australia and transportation of goods between Australia
and the United States.

In your report (allowing for reasonable assumptions when necessary),

Select one of the two SLM contracts described above.
Analyze the product’s physical properties, volume, and quantities to
determine if the product’s shipment size is small (150 to 500 pounds)
or a larger (consolidated) shipment (at least one TEU).
Evaluate at least two modes of transportation that best support the
organization’s supply chain for shipping the product from one country
to another, door-to-door, in a multimodal shipment. Explain your
reasoning.
Identify the type of warehouses that SLM should employ in Australia to
ensure a rapid movement of goods. Recommend either public, private, or
contract warehousing and explain how your recommendation supports
SLM’s supply chain management.
List and describe the necessary commercial, banking, and shipping
documents that comply with export and import procedures in the United
States. These may include a commercial invoice, certificate of origin,
shipper’s export declaration, shipper’s letter of instruction, bill of
lading, freight bill, and letter of credit.
Determine the appropriate Incoterms® 2010 rule, depending on the
shipment mode and buyers’ and sellers’ responsibilities.
Select a process (Lean, Six Sigma, Just-in-Time, or Kanban) and
explain how the process can be implemented to ensure effective and
efficient warehouse operations techniques are in place that support
the company’s supply chain design.
List a minimum of four additional budget line items in the table below
with a rationale to ensure smooth warehouse operations in Australia.
Support your rationale by including various logistics activity
measures, cost drivers, profit models, and the role of inventory and
how they influence SLM’s financial outcomes.

Budget line item

Rationale

Shipment consolidation

Cost savings management

Warehouse safety and security

Efficient and safe warehouse operations

Software implementation

Order management, customer relationship management, and load-planning
for a truck trailer.

The attached article is one of the more famous bureaucracy-related pieces of political science scholarship, and is considered a “must read” for all students of public administration. Read the attached article and respond to the following questions:
1. After briefly describing the premise of this article, describe a recent encounter you have had with a “street-level bureaucrat.”
2. Was this encounter a generally positive experience, or negative experience, in your mind? What made the experience positive or negative?
3. In what ways did the “street-level bureaucrat,” in the experience you identify, further (or hinder) the public policy of his or her agency during their encounter with you?
4. Describe at least one way (using at least one specific reference to the article) in which this article helped you better understand or appreciate your encounter with a “street-level bureaucrat.”
Your essay must be between 6-8 pages in length, be double-spaced with standard (1-inch) margins and 12-point Times New Roman font. Your essay will be graded on a scale of 0-100 based on the following rubric: (a) does the essay meet the structural requirements of the essay prompt in terms of length, margins, font, etc.?; (b) does the essay adequately and fully address each of the questions in the essay prompt?; (c) are all references to outside sources/ideas/authority appropriately cited (you may use any citation method you chose – just be consistent throughout your essay)?; and (d) is the essay well-written and generally free of proofreading errors?

Choose a Natural Hazard that most interests you such as earthquakes, volcano, tsunamis, landslide, tornado, hurricane, etc., and conduct online research to write a research paper. Based on the research paper you selected, you should submit as an attachment at least two pages document following the rubrics listed below.
Introduction paragraph: includes the title of your natural hazard and a summary describing your natural hazard and explaining why you are most interested in this particular hazard (5 pts, at least half page).
Discussion paragraph: discuss the findings in your research with respect to: (A) What is the cause of the hazard and how does it acquire energy? (B) What are the damages caused by it? (C) Can it be predicted? If so, how? If not, why? (15 pts, at least one page)
A paragraph of your reflection: explain how you will apply what you have learned from your research regarding: (A) What should you do if this happens? (B) Where is the safest place to be? (C) What is the plan of action before, during and after the disaster? (5 pts, at least half page)
Figure or Illustration, and at least three references, on separate page and is not counted as part of the at least two pages. (5 pts).
Format of the attached word or pdf document: 12 pt Times New Roman (font), 1.5- line spacing, minimum 3 paragraphs (introduction, discussion, reflection) within the at least two- page document. (pdf. doc and docx is accepted)

For your
assignment this week, select two of the following scenarios and answer all
parts of the questions as prompted.
******************
Although
colleges and universities have utilized distance learning (i.e., online
classes) for many years, teaching kindergarten through 12th-grade students
using an online platform is much rarer. Unfortunately, the COVID-19
(Coronavirus) pandemic of 2020 forced K-12 schools throughout the world to
turn to distance learning to teach children under 18. But how effective is an
online curriculum for children who are only familiar with physical
classrooms? To answer this question, your local school district asks you to
conduct a series of studies focusing on the new distance learning curriculum
they developed to teach K-12 students. Fortunately, the school district does
have a control group option available to you should you need it. That is,
some classrooms can use in-person instruction as the school has adequate
safety measures in place to protect these students. The school administrator
who hired you has four goals (though only the first goal must be addressed in
all study designs):
First,
the school administrator must know if online students are adequately learning
material appropriate for their age group (as measured by an end-of-semester
exam that all students must pass).
Second,
the administrator would like to know if the curriculum they developed works
equally well across students with different computer experience (experienced
versus inexperienced).
Third,
the administrator would like to know if students are improving as they
progress through the semester.
Fourth,
the administrator would like to know if the curriculum helps male and female
students equally.
The
school administrator recognizes that the COVID-19 pandemic is temporary but
that other pandemics might occur in the future, or K-12 schools might
naturally evolve an online component. Thus, the administrator would like to
know how well distance learning students perform over the next four calendar
years.

Assignment
Instructions:
You have
come up with a series of studies to test the administrator’s goals.
Use the
information in the study designs presented below to determine whether the
design involves a posttest-only between-groups design, a pretest-posttest
between groups design, a matched pairs design, a block design, a within-group
design (pretest, posttest), or a longitudinal design.
Determine
if the study meets the first goal of the administrator.
Determine
whether the study meets at least one other goal, and if not,
describe how you would alter the study design to meet at least one other
administrator goal.

Scenario
A
You
design a study where you randomly assign students to one of two conditions.
In one condition, students take the curriculum fully online. In the second
condition, they take the curriculum fully in person. However, because you
think familiarity and experience with computers might impact how students
adapt to fully online classes, you first find students who are experienced
with computers as well as students who are not experienced with computers. To
make sure the two conditions are composed of students who share similar
traits and abilities, you pair up experienced computer users and send one to
Condition 1 and the other to Condition 2. You do the same for the next pair
(and the next). You also pair up students who are not experienced with
computers and similarly assign one to Condition 1 and the other to Condition
2. Here, the independent variable is the condition (online versus in-person
teaching), and the dependent variable(s) is the extent to which the child
learns the age-appropriate material (as measured by passing the final exam
and/or assignments).
This
study best describes which of the six research designs described in this
lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the
first administrator goal.
Does
this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
If yes,
which one and why?
If no,
how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator
goal?
Scenario
B
You
design a study where you randomly assign students to one of two conditions.
In one condition, students take the curriculum fully online. In the second
condition, they take the curriculum fully in person. All students take a
pretest at the start of the semester and a post-test at the end of the
semester. Here, there are two independent variables. One is the type of
course (online versus in person), and the second is timing (pretest at the
start of the semester versus post-test at the end of the semester). The
dependent variable(s) is the extent to which the child learns the
age-appropriate material (as measured by passing the final exam and/or
assignments).
This
study best describes which of the six research designs described in this
lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the
first administrator goal.
Does
this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
If yes,
which one and why?
If no,
how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator
goal?
Scenario
C
You
design a study where you randomly assign students to one of two conditions.
In one condition, children will have in-person instruction in a physical
classroom. In the second condition, the children will have online
instruction. Both conditions will use the same curriculum, though the online
version is remote. The independent variable will be the condition (in person
or online), and the dependent variable(s) will be the extent to which the
child learns the age-appropriate material (as measured by passing the final
exam and/or assignments).
This
study best describes which of the six research designs described in this
lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the
first administrator goal.
Does
this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
If yes,
which one and why?
If no,
how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator
goal?
Scenario
D
You
design a study where you randomly assign students to one of two conditions.
In one condition, children will have in-person instruction in a physical
classroom. In the second condition, the children will have online
instruction. However, you first match students on multiple key
characteristics that you think might impact their learning. In this case, you
focus on their computer experience and gender. That is, you pair students
with the same computer experience and then randomly assign one member of each
pair to the online condition and the other member to the in-person condition.
Similarly,
you pair inexperienced students, you pair males, and you pair females, and
once again assign one member of each pair to the online condition and the
other to the in-person condition. You do this for all students. Thus, male
experienced computer users, male inexperienced computer users, female
experienced computer users, and female inexperienced computer users are
present in both online and in-person classes. The dependent variable(s) is
the extent to which the child learns the age-appropriate material (as
measured by passing the final exam and/or assignments).
This
study best describes which of the six research designs described in this
lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the
first administrator goal.
Does
this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
If yes,
which one and why?
If no,
how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator
goal?
Scenario
E
Unfortunately,
you find that the school district cannot give you an adequate in-person
comparison group; therefore, all students will participate in the new online
curriculum. Since they still want your help to assess the program’s
effectiveness, you decide to do so by assessing student knowledge at the
start of the semester and comparing it to their knowledge at the end of the
semester. The dependent variable(s) is the extent to which the child learns
the age-appropriate material (as measured by passing the final exam and/or
assignments).
This
study best describes which of the six research designs described in this
lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the
first administrator goal.
Does
this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
If yes,
which one and why?
If no,
how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator
goal?
Scenario
F
You
design a study where you randomly assign students to one of two conditions.
In one condition, children will have in-person instruction in a physical
classroom. In the second condition, the children will have online
instruction. Fortunately, your study design allows you to follow and assess
both sets of students multiple times over four years. Even as the students
advance from one grade to the next, your study will determine if taking classes
online helps or hurts their ability to pass assignments and final exams (the
dependent variables in this study). The independent variables would be (a)
the varying amounts of times assessments are taken (quarterly, mid-semester,
end of the semester, the following semester, the next school year, etc.) and
(b) the two conditions, in-person and online instruction.
This
study best describes which of the six research designs described in this
lesson? Explain your response, including how this study design meets the
first administrator goal.
Does
this design meet any of the other administrator goals?
If yes,
which one and why?
If no,
how could you redesign the study to meet at least one other administrator
goal?
Length:
5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages
References:
Include a minimum of 3 scholarly resources.
The
completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements,
exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful
consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should
integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA
standards, and adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.
When
applicable, conduct a Turnitin pre-check and then upload your completed
assignment and click the Submit to Dropbox button.

Rubric
Name: Signature Assignment Rubric
Print
Rubric

Criteria

Does
Not Meet Expectations (0% – 72%)

Below
Expectations (73%-82%)

Meets
Expectations (83%-89%)

Exceeds
Most Expectations (90%-93%)

Exceeds
All Expectations (94%-100%)

Criterion
Score

The
writing is clear and compelling. 7%

1.3
points
Student
failed to demonstrate a well-developed focus, and there is little evidence of
integration of reading material or conceptual knowledge.

1.4
points
Student
demonstrated some focus, some logical organization of ideas, and some
integration of readings revealing conceptual knowledge and skills.

1.6
points
Student
mostly demonstrated a well-developed focus, a logical organization of ideas,
and exhibited an integration of readings revealing conceptual knowledge and
skills.

1.7
points
Student
demonstrated strength in almost all the following areas: a well-developed
focus, a logical organization of ideas, integration of readings revealing
conceptual knowledge and skills, and inclusion of some scholarly citations to
support ideas presented in the assignment.

1.8
points
Student
demonstrated strength in all the following areas: a well-developed focus, a
logical organization of ideas, integration of readings revealing conceptual
knowledge and skills, and inclusion of several scholarly citations to support
ideas presented in the assignment.

Score of
The writing is clear and compelling. 7%,
/ 1.8

The
writing reflects correct punctuation, grammar, word usage, and APA style. 7%

1.3
points
Student
needs to refine grammar, punctuation, and APA formatting because many errors
were evident.

1.4
points
Student
used some correct grammar, punctuation, and APA formatting.

1.6
points
Student
used mostly correct grammar, punctuation, and APA formatting, having less
than five errors.

1.7
points
Student
used correct grammar, punctuation, and APA formatting, with only three or
four errors.

1.8
points
Student
used correct grammar, punctuation, and APA formatting, with no more than one
or two errors.

Score of
The writing reflects correct punctuation, grammar, word usage, and APA style.
7%,
/ 1.8

The
response to the FIRST scenario is complete, with detailed explanations and
scholarly citations. 40%

7.2
points
Response
to the scenario is inaccurate or incomplete.

8.2
points
Response
to the scenario contains some inaccuracies or is incomplete.

8.9
points
Response
to the scenario is accurate, complete and supported with the required number
of scholarly references.

9.3
points
Response
to the scenario includes sound explanations, with clear details and accurate
ideas with thorough explanations, along with more than the required amount of
scholarly references.

10
points
Response
to the scenario is exceptionally crafted with detailed explanations,
compelling ideas and supported with scholarly references.

Score of
The response to the FIRST scenario is complete, with detailed explanations
and scholarly citations. 40%,
/ 10

The
response to the SECOND scenario is complete, with detailed explanations and
scholarly citations. 40%

7.2
points
Response
to the scenario is inaccurate or incomplete.

8.2
points
Response
to the scenario contains some inaccuracies or is incomplete.

8.9 points
Response
to the scenario is accurate, complete and supported with the required number
of scholarly references.

9.3
points
Response
to the scenario includes sound explanations, with clear details and accurate
ideas with thorough explanations, along with more than the required amount of
scholarly references.

10
points
Response
to the scenario is exceptionally crafted with detailed explanations,
compelling ideas and supported with scholarly references.

Score of
The response to the SECOND scenario is complete, with detailed explanations
and scholarly citations. 40%,
/ 10

Criteria

Level
3

Exceeds
All Expectations

Criterion
Score

The
student met the required length for the assignment. 6%

1.1
points
The
assignment is longer or shorter than required.

1.4
points
The
assignment meets the length requirement.

Score of
The student met the required length for the assignment. 6%,
/ 1.4