Best Writer

Project
You have tasked by one of the Principal Engineers at your firm to review the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) method for calculating the axial capacity of piles. They want you to write a
report summarizing the method and to provide an example calculation demonstrating how to use the
FHWA method. The principal provided you with CPT, SPT, and Oedometer data from a recent project in
downtown Boston you can use in the example. You may also use reasonable correlations from textbooks
or the NAVFAC manual. The report you generate will be distributed to your colleagues for use as a
design reference in future projects.
For this project you will be required to review the method for calculating the axial capacity of driven piles
from the FHWA Design and Construction of Driven Pile Foundations manual.
*** Teacher specified this document is to be treated as a memo that is going to be passed around the office to be used as a guide.

research paper focusing on the role of law enforcement in society. You may choose any aspect of law enforcement you wish, but suggestions are listed below.
What is the role of the agency’s fight in law enforcement?
What laws does it enforce?
What is the power structure in the organization? That is, who is the head, who are the subordinates?
Are there any statistics involved?
Are there any high profile moments for that agency, or stand-out agents?
What are the current trends in that agency’s fight for justice?

Explain how brain development influence sexual behavior in adolescence?
a. Describe how the research was conducted (methods, population, instruments)
b. Give the conclusions of the authors
c. Critique the research
d. Explain the relevance to research question
3. Conclusion
3
a. Describe what was learned about the topic from the research.
b. What questions still remain and what further research is needed?
4. Bibliography of articles cited in APA style
5. Logical presentation of ideas
6. Quality of writing

W‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌rite a five-page paper about the Curtis Flowers case, as reported on by Madeleine Baran in Season 2 of the In the Dark podcast. Curtis Flowers was tried six times for a crime he almost certainly did not commit. His most recent conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2019, on the grounds that the prosecutor engaged in racial bias during jury selection. In addition to racial bias, many other problems permeate this case, including several of the issues we cover in class (e.g., witness memory; confirmation bias; and coercive tactics). In addition to the podcast, I want you to listen to the oral arguments in the Supreme Court case and read a summary of the Court’s opinion. For your paper, I want you to discuss your thoughts and reactions to the Flower’s case in light of the research on the human psychological factors that contribute to wrongful conviction that you have learned about in class. Where to find the stuff you need: You can find season 2 of the In the Dark podcast here (or anywhere you get your podcasts; ., Apple; Spotify etc.): There are 11 episodes in the initial reporting of the case. These are required for the paper. The podcast followed as the case moved through the system, was overturned by the Court, and Mississippi decided next steps. After episodes 1-11, you will find several “updates” and a new set of follow-up episodes (12-20). The updates and episodes 12-20 are not required, though I encourage you to listen to them. I am fairly sure that after listening to episodes 1-11, you will want to listen to what happened next. You can find the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in the case here. There will be a link on the left hand side of where you can listen to the arguments. This is required. You can read the Supreme Court’s syllabus‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ (summary) of the majority decision here. This is required. Instructions and tips regarding format and content: This is a reaction paper, so you actually have a lot of freedom in terms of what you choose to focus on. A reaction paper is exactly what it sounds like: it is your reaction (your response, feelings, opinion) following exposure to the story. You all won’t come away with the exact same thoughts — so you have freedom to focus on what was most compelling, interesting etc. to you. The only restrictions are 1. That you discuss your opinions/feelings/impression in the context of what you have learned in the course An example: ” The detectives concluded that the [evidence] found [location] pointed to Curtis’ guilt, but according to [source] the [evidence] was unreliable due to [reason]. Had the detectives considered [issue/fact/data point/ other evidence] they might have pursued [other lead]. It alarms me how easily an unreliable piece of evidence can be seen different ways depending on what one believes about a suspect ‘s guilt. ” 2. That your opinions/reasoning are fact-based. Examples: It is my opinion that prosecutors should be required to [policy], because in X% of cases where a person has been exonerated, prosecutors failed to [behavior/action]. Even though mistakes happen, I disagree with those who argue that police should not be allowed to do [behavior/action]. I think this way because in many cases [behavior/action] is the only way to [positive outcome]. However, since we also know that [behavior/action] can lead to [problematic outcome], there should be restrictions on when/where police can [behavior/action] This is a relatively short paper, therefore, you should NOT spend much time summarizing the case itself. One or two paragraphs at most are sufficient to provide an overview of the case‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌.

330+ words
1.Metals: What are your thoughts on metals and their use in our society? As usual these minerals fall into the category of being taken for granted within our modern consumer society without any thoughts about their origins or the often large externalized costs that surround their extraction from the ground. What types of metals are you surrounded by in your daily life? Where do they come from? Are they potentially causing any harm (toxicology) to your body? Make an attempt to list the metals that surround you in your daily life? What kind of metal items do you use on a daily basis? However, try to focus specifically on the environmental costs associated with these items? Research mining practices and their externalized costs.
Choose a mining site and/or a metal and bring it to the forum
(embed images – use the embed image function in the tool bar).
Write a thoughtful, analytical and comprehensive primary post (350+ words). You are, of course, expected to examine the works of the other students and respond to them in a thoughtful and creative fashion. Your task is to trigger a debate originating from the original post so try to be creative in your responses. You can agree or disagree as long as you provide a solid argument. Post at least three responses to the posts of other students over the week.

2. Green Design & The Cities of the Future: What will the cities of the future look like? More and more people live in cities – a trend that was enhanced during the 20th century. It is an incredible feat logistically and from a resource perspective to gather so many people in one place. have you ever considered the incredible logistic behind a large city? Today there are numerous large megapolises across the world many of which are showcased in the media section of this week’s module. There are even some environmentalists that are suggesting that we may need to be in cities to protect ourselves from the mayhem that may be the consequences of the climate crisis. For example, the wildfires in the west makes it more difficult to live in rural areas. It is easier to protect specific regions with high population density. In addition, it is likely that you have come across the concept of Green Design over the last few years. More and more buildings incorporate elements linked to increasing its sustainability. Do you have any Green Design in your own house? In the neighborhood? Look around and report back here in the forum. Are there any Green Design elements that you have considered to incorporate into your home? What are they and why do you want them? Finally, have you ever had any dream of building your own home? Would that be a “green home” or is it more of a fantasy house? Do you think we can transform California with the help of Green Design over the next century? Our nation? The world? Use the materials to envision the cities of the future. Are we moving towards sustainable cities or are cities literally cancer growths on the Earth’s surface? How can we build the cities of the future to make them sustainable? Bring forward examples of Green Design and/or future cities (embed images – use the insert image function in the tool bar).

Write a thoughtful, analytical and comprehensive primary post (350+ words). You are, of course, expected to examine the works of the other students and respond to them in a thoughtful and creative fashion. Your task is to trigger a debate originating from the original post so try to be creative in your responses. You can agree or disagree as long as you provide a solid argument. Post at least three responses to the posts of other students over the week.

What is Colorado’s legal scope of practice for a Medical Assistant and what is their scope of practice in other states and why does it vary from state to state.

1. Identify the compromised health state identified in your interview. 5
2. Analyze your personal thoughts about the compromised health state from your interview. Did you gain additional insight? Did you discover anything new about living with this compromised health state? Was the person’s perspective different from your perspective regarding teamwork and interprofessional collaboration?
3. Identify the compromised health state identified in the memoir you read. 5
4. Analyze your personal thoughts about the compromised health state identified in the memoir. Has your opinion changed? Did you gain additional insight?
25
5. How has reading the memoir and interviewing the person with a compromised health state affected you? What insight will you bring with you into your practice?
30
6. APA style (grammar, punctuation, references, in text citation, logical flow of content). Limited to two pages excluding title and reference pages. Reference the memoir only ( my stroke of insight by Jill Bolte Taylor)

I want A detailed analysis. It should be extracted from the overall approaches or methodologies that the authors have utilized and how they applied them within their context or field of study. this could be any data gathering or surveys or interviews thay have done to accept or reject their assumption. Moreover, you will have to orient all what you have extracted towards your main topic which is ( the impact of technology on the quality of project management) how it applies in this field and what kind of problem it tackled and solve as wellComments from Customerthe course name is (Information Technology Project Management 5th Edition) Discipline: project management

1‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌) Describe the events leading up to the riot, 2) Identify what happened during the riot, 3) Explain its impact on the facility, staff, and inmates, 4) Denote identifiable lessons that should be learned from the event that could prevent additional disturbances, riots, or hostage situations, and 5) Evaluate the riot’s impact on the correctional system as a whole It is strongly suggested that students review Module 8 and incorporate information and concepts such as: a) The “Precipitating Event” or Explosive Event b) Was it a “Planned” or “Unplanned Disturbance” or a combination and why. c) How Staff Organized and What was their initial and s‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ubsequent response? d) What type of Organizational Structure did the inmates form; it any? e) What type of approach was used to Confront the inmates and why was that approach used? f) How was the event Terminated? g) Compare, if possible, the administration’s or investigative authorities h) Explanation for the Causes and that of the inmates. Include concepts such as public safety, Constitutional issues, Using Federal Emergency Management and State Emergency Management tools such as Mitigation, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery explain how you, as a senior correctional administrator, would have responded to prevent, prepare, respond, and/or to recover‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‌‌ from this event.

Is Abortion Worth it?
Claim: Abortion is not the way to go.
1st Reason+Evidence: Abortion is murder
2nd Reason+Evidence: Dangerous for the mother
3rd Reason+Evidence: Less opportunity for members of the LGBTQ to addopt
Opposition: Family isn’t financially stable to raise a child
Restate Claim: Abortion is not the way to go.

That is the Outline you must go by!

These are the professor’s instructions:

Did the Writer Follow the Writing Process?

* 5 points: Outline & Tiny Rough Draft in the Discussion Board
* 5 points: Peer review done

Did the Writer Achieve the Final Product?
FINAL DRAFT 9-Part Criteria

* 5 points:
1) The Introduction paragraph ends with your CLAIM Statement:
Does the Claim Statement accurately identify whether your position, defending your belief in regards to a controversial/ disputed AND SPECIFIC decision or action, based on the assigned Essay 4 topics?

*20 points:
2) Is it an Essay (Intro paragraph, Body paragraphs, Conclusion paragraph)? ALSO, Essay 4 is a Classic or Toulmin Argument essay, so the body paragraphs need to be arranged following that Argument’s paragraph order. Also, are your body paragraphs in the correct STRUCTURE, and do each body paragraph have the required information in the correct structure order?

FOR A TOULMIN ARGUMENT:
Intro Paragraph, ending with your CLAIM Statement <-- YOUR POSITION ON THE CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE, that is, WHAT YOU BELIEVE TO BE THE TRUTH. Section I (1-2 body paragraphs): 1st REASON for the Claim + EVIDENCE (example or examples from events that actually happened in real life) Section II (1-2 body paragraphs): 2nd REASON for the Claim + EVIDENCE (example or examples from events that actually happened in real life) Section III (1-2 paragraphs): 3rd REASON for the Claim + EVIDENCE (example or examples from events that actually happened in real life) Section IV (1-2 paragraphs): A) Starts with your OPPOSITION’S Reason (respectfully and fairly explained) and then B) your refuting REBUTTAL to the Opposition (why you think they are still wrong) Conclusion Paragraph, starting with Restated Claim Statement * 10 points: 3) The paragraphs of Essay 4 need to total at least 1000 words. So, does the draft meet WORD COUNT? *10 points: 4) All the DETAILS (reasons and evidence) should support the Claim. So, do all the details support that Claim, or are there details that digress from the Claim and therefore need to be deleted and replaced? Is each piece of evidence SPECIFIC and CONCRETE (that is, are there names of places, persons, and so on)? For any source used in a body paragraph (that is, anywhere you use OUTSIDE EVIDENCE in a body paragraph), are the sourced details relevant to the topic sentence, EMBEDDED correctly, and have a corresponding analysis/commentary? 1. Your Topic Sentence. 2. Your explanation of what that topic sentence means (optional) 3. Example pulled from a source -- supporting your Topic Sentence --either “Quoted,” paraphrased, or summarized – with in-text citation: a) Beginning ID tag of name or title and/or b) parentheses at the end (more info in MLA chapter). 4. If you have more than one example, have transitions between examples – Also, In addition, Next, Or, However, On the other hand 5. End your body paragraph with an explanation of what these examples add to our understanding of the Thesis (that is, your CLAIM STATEMENT). * 10 points: 5) Are there any errors in GRAMMAR, like run-ons and fragments? * 10 points: 6) Are there any errors in MECHANICS, like incorrect punctuation (especially comma use), capitalization, and number use? * 10 points: 7) Are there any errors in DICTION, like incorrect word choice (like its vs its, there vs. their, definitely vs defiantly, slang words), deficient transition words (that is, the essay sounds very choppy and disjointed, like a robot speaking), use of "you" in the body paragraphs, awkward phrasing, confused words, awkward phrasing, repetitive word use, and/or too-casual/informal slang/idioms? NOTE: Dr. Ramos DOES ALLOW careful use of "I", "we", and "our" in your essay. NO "YOU" IN THE BODY PARAGRAPHS. * 10 points: 8) Is there at least ONE college-level SOURCE paraphrased or "quoted" in ANYWHERE in Essay 4, and are its MLA documentation (MLA version 8) complete and correct (in-text citation and Work Cited entry), including hanging indentation, alphabetizing, and double-spacing of the Works Cited list? NOTE 1: Suggested college-level sources: any of the Reader Response 1-7 readings in Structures, personal interview -- that is, a conversation -- that you've done with a person who is either a participant, witness, or expert in the issue; an article from an online library database source; an article from a reputable web site (I'll only accept from website from .edu, .gov, .mil, and national new sites like abcnews.com or from news websites found on news aggregators like news.yahoo.com and news.google.com) NOTE 2: You can use EasyBib’s Works Cited web app to help you format a source in your Essay 4, especially if pulled from a reputable web article: NOTE 3: You can use this YouTube tutorial to format your Work Cited page correctly, to double-check what EasyBib gives you * 5 points: 9) Are there any errors in MLA MANUSCRIPT style (that is, paper format) -- corner page numbering, header placement, essay title placement, paragraph indentation, double-space line spacing, AND no extra spaces between header, essay title, and paragraphs?