Premium Writing

Week 7 Case Study: Genetics and Inheritance
Due

Sunday by
11:59pm
Points
15
Submitting
a file upload
Week 7 Case Study: Genetics and Inheritance
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook
Weekly Concepts
Minimum of 1 scholarly source
Scenario/Summary
History:
A 2-week-old has an abnormality on her universal newborn screening
lab test that indicates she may have cystic fibrosis. She is currently
doing well. Her parents report that in the hospital she did not pass her
first bowel movement until the 3rd day of life and that the staff was concerned about that. Her parents have noted that she “tastes salty” when they kiss her.
Physical:
Appears healthy with good growth.
Labs:
Sweat chloride and genetic testing for cystic fibrosis ordered.
Assessment: Cystic fibrosis
Deliverables
Answer the following questions based on the scenario and article
above and save your responses in a Microsoft Word document. Provide a
scholarly resource in APA format to support your answers.
Define genotype.
Define phenotype.
What gene mutation is associated with cystic fibrosis? How does this affect mucus production?
How is cystic fibrosis inherited?
Describe 3 problems that a patient with cystic fibrosis may have-choose 1 problem from 3 different body systems.
Required Software
Microsoft Office: Word

Summarize the historical roots of interest groups. Identify two interest groups and discuss their impact on American society.

Letter Assignment
For this assignment, you are to write a one-page professional letter. You may choose to write either an inquiry letter (ask questions to acquire information) or a claim letter (a polite, reasonable complaint).
Base your inquiry or claim letter on a real-life experience and your personal perspective as a student, consumer, parent, employee, etc. Please choose a topic with which you are familiar based on a previous or current experience or interest.
Just like with the memo assignment, remember that this is a professional document and should be
Properly formatted and organized,
Fully developed (have you convinced your reader to seriously consider your suggestions?),
Rhetorically appealing, and
Well-written.

This discussion post refers to Post 8 and the Elizabeth Wardle article.
In this discussion post, you will accomplish two things:
1) Provide feedback for the two students who posted below you in Post 8. Feel free to point out anything interesting, similar, or insightful.
2) In at 150 words or more, address the following:
“Wardle seems to be arguing that Alan did not successfully join his new workplace community because he was resisting it: He did not want to adopt the identity that people in the community imagined for him. James Gee would likely have a different opinion; he might argue that Alan had too much tension or conflict due to other communities he belonged to or that he didn’t have the appropriate ‘identity kit’ to belong. Who do you agree with more, Wardle or Gee, and why?”
_____________________________________________________________
**Remember to fully address all prompts and write at least 300 words (going over will not result in penalty). Please include the word count in your post

Write an essay discussing why Devon died an untimely death at the age of 33. Make sure to use all the materials on risk, infection, intersectionality, hypermasculinity, homophobia, etc on the book my brother by jamaica kincaids

Political Action. This assignment is meant to encourage increased awareness and involvement in political action, as it relates to nursing and health care

Summary statements must include how the activity you completed is relevant to nursing or health care.
Examples of activities that will fulfill the requirements include, but not limited to:
a. Writing to one of your state or federal legislators regarding nursing or a health care issue. Submit a copy in BB.
b. Writing a letter to the editor of your local newspaper. Submit a copy in BB.
c. Interviewing a political candidate regarding his/her opinions on health care reform. Submit a summary in BB.
d. Campaigning for a political candidate or ballot issue. Submit evidence of participation in BB.
e. Conducting voter registration. Submit evidence of completion in BB.
f. Attending a legislative hearing or Nursing Commission Meeting and write a summary of topics discussed and the importance to nursing. Submit summary in BB.

write 400-600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
Complete the following for this assignment:
Research the role of regulation and accreditation, and discuss the role that each plays in holding health care professionals and organizations accountable.
Choose 2 of the following types of health care organizations:
Acute care hospital
Nursing home
Home health care
Ambulatory care
Discuss accreditation as it relates to those organizations.
Describe the role that accrediting agencies have in clinical quality improvement and improving health care outcomes.
Note: Use APA style to cite at least 2 scholarly sources from the last 5 years.

Week 7 Assignment: Part II: How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens Presentation
Due

Submitting
a website url, a media recording, or a file upload
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 17. Also, Chapter 11 and 12 from Week 6 might still be relevant.
Lesson
Minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.
Instructions
This is Part II of the assignment you submitted in Week 6.
Using the case outline (Part I: How the Courts Address or Respect Our
Rights as Citizens) you submitted in Week 6, prepare and submit a
presentation, which will either be a narrated PowerPoint, a Kaltura
Video, or some other format as approved by your instructor. Be sure to verify the presentation format with your instructor before starting work on this assignment.
The presentation Point presentation will need to include:
Name the case
Discuss the facts of the case
Discuss the history of the case (what laws or legal action was taken)
Discuss the issues or the facts of the case and legal questions the court must decide
Discuss if the court’s decision or holdings was for the plaintiff or
for the defendant and what were the reasons for the decision?
Discuss the concurring and dissenting opinions from the judge or if a jury trial, the jury.
Important: In this assignment, you are expected to
elaborate the points you made in the prior assignment in Week 6. This
assignment will be graded on your strength to elaborate and explain the
facts of the case and proper use of visual aids, good narration, and
presenting to the case and how well you stick to the case. For example,
if you are using the PowerPoint, you are also expected to include proper
visuals that are relevant to the case. Do not copy-paste the outline
into this and call it complete.
This assignment is worth 250 points.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: The presentation must be 10-15 slides long if using
PowerPoint (excluding cover and reference pages) or 3-5 minute long if
using a video presentation.
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to textbook if cited)
Use the speaker notes to elaborate on the content on the slides

o begin the action research process, a researcher selects a focus and clarifies the vision and targets of the research. A close review of current scholarly sources about a research topic helps to clarify vision and targets of the research and builds support for a research investigation.
In Topic 1 you selected two areas of research for your action research study. From these two areas, select one area to further develop as an action research project throughout this course. Based on the area of research selected, identify a specific topic or focus to apply the action research process.
For this assignment, develop an action research proposal, create an annotated bibliography of current research (within the last five years), and develop research questions.
Write a 50-100 word research proposal explaining the vision and target of the action research, including your theory of action.
Examine five recent, peer-reviewed research studies related to the topic selected and write a 100-150 word annotation for each study.
Each annotation must include the following:
Assumption of the limits of the research
Type of research (qualitative or quantitative).
Methodology participants, instrumentation, design, and procedure
Results (1-2 sentence summary)
Gaps in the research
Based on the research reviewed, develop 3-5 research questions based on the identified gaps in the research. These research questions will serve as the foundation for collecting data in the next topic.
Support your work with 5-7 scholarly resources.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Guidelines
Please answer any of the following question. Treat this section as if you were answering a client inquiry. What information would you want to provide them? If the problem isn’t obvious, what questions would you ask to gather more information?
As with section one, it’s recommended you supply screenshots and code snippets where appropriate. Linking to documentation is also suggested.
Please note: you don’t have to be a Datadog expert in order to answer these questions. Treat these as fact-finding missions. Please start by reading through the question to get a basic understanding, and then search through our documentation, blog posts, and open source Github repositories to get started.
Question 2: No Traces Visible
Hi Support,
I have recently spun up APM in a dockerized environment with both my Python application running in a docker container and the Datadog agent (using the latest image and latest version of the python tracer) running in a docker container. For some reason, I am not seeing any traces in the DD UI. According to the agent logs, no traces are even being received. I am certain the application is receiving traffic (this is in our production environment). I use the following to launch the agent container:
docker run -d -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro
-v /proc/:/host/proc/:ro
-v /sys/fs/cgroup/:/host/sys/fs/cgroup:ro
-p 127.0.0.1:8126:8126/tcp
-e DD_API_KEY=
-e DD_APM_ENABLED=true
datadog/agent:latest
And then I use this to launch my python app once the Docker container is up and running:
ddtrace-run python web-store.py
Please let me know how to get traces to report.