Best Writer

This is a 2-3 page, typed, double-spaced paper.
Select one (1) Supreme Court case from the list of cases in “Scenarios from Selected Supreme Court Cases” (see the attached document). You will analyze this one (1) Supreme Court case from the perspective of five of the major concepts we have learned in the first half of the course. These major concepts are:
Living under a government that protects person and property, no exceptions
Living under a government that does not harm person and property
Religion
Personal Liberty
Self-Government
Instead of an introduction, simply state the name of the case that you will analyze. Then write five paragraphs, each one devoted to one of the concepts listed above, and in the order listed above.
Each paragraph must consist of the following five parts, and in this order:
State which side of the case will promote the concept you are discussing; if the concept does not apply to your case, then state that it does not apply.
Explain why this side promotes this concept, or why this concept does not apply to the case (using details from the case).
Provide a primary source quotation from the textbook that defines the concept you are discussing (this should not be a quotation describing your case).
Explain what the quotation says, using your own words.
Re-state which side will promote this concept (or re-state that it does not apply) and the reason why, but this time when you re-state the reason why, use part of the quotation you just used instead of using your own words. (See the sample paragraph that follows for an example of how to do this part.)
Follow this pattern for all five major paragraphs, and you are done.
Note on citation: at the end of your quotation, cite the quotation by using the activity number and letter of the quotation as it appears in the textbook and place these in quotation marks followed by a period.

Watch the two youtube link videos above and write a essay answering the questions below and include 5 references.

One of the funniest episodes of the Mythbusters is also one that is full of different experiments and hypothesis testing examples. Adam and Jaime try 4 different techniques for sobering up and make conclusions either busted (i.e., fail to reject the null) or plausible (i.e., reject the null) about each. Do you agree with their conclusions? Which ones do you agree with? Why do you agree or disagree?

If you were hired as a consultant for the police department, what procedures would you implement to ensure that you would decrease problems with your eyewitness testimony?
How can classical conditioning mechanisms explain drug tolerance and what are some of the implications of these mechanisms?

Select a realistic business project risk scenario that you might use for your course-length final project risk management plan .

Obtain faculty approval on your selected project risk scenario.

Research and identify a suitable project for risk management discussion and analysis. Several examples are available in weekly readings and Course Question Area of our classroom. The following guidelines apply:
The project must contain detailed information related to overall project requirements and related risks
The project must contain adequate substance to support discussing risk identification, risk documentation, and contingency planning
The project must be ongoing and approved by your facilitator
The project may be documented through research or a personal experience

Write a paper of no more than 1,400 words that describes the project’s background and general requirements, which must include prescheduled milestones, cost constraints, and quality requirements. The paper must relay the theoretical and practical application of the following:
The framework for risk identification in the project; for example: WBS, brainstorming, and critical success factors
Fault tree and event tree techniques and how they could be used to identify risks
Project risks in the selected scenario
Elements used in documenting project risks
Submit your assignment.

write an essay comparing the size of the China ‘s economy with the sizes of economies of US, India, Russia and Germany and Czech Republic in selected years (say 2000, 2010 and 2020 if available, if not use 2019.

b. Use 12 point type and double space your essay.
c. Write the review in formal academic English. There will be a late penalty of 5% (after the Mercy Date of 15 June). The essay will be a review of Catharine Parr Traills The Backwoods of Canada. (Please note that book titles are always italicized; also note the thar in Catharine.) This book, first published in London, England, in 1836, is not a novel! It is a series of letters from Mrs. Traill, the wife of an ex-British Army officer, who has immigrated to Canada from Scotland, to her mother in England. It is a narrative, it is an epistolary account, and perhaps even a journal, but it is not a novel, which is a work of fiction. You are to review the book from the point of view of a modern historian. This book is a primary source written by a person who lived at that time.
What does this book tell us of Canada in the 1830s?
What experiences does Mrs. Traill have?
What are her impressions of Lower Canada? Montreal? Upper Canada? The Bush country? The Canadians, French, English, and First Nations? Americans? Social classes? Recent British immigrants?
How does she change over the course of the book?
What advice does she give?
What can you see of a distinctly Canadian national character forming?
What parts of the book impress you the most? What did you learn from her account?
d. You must quote from the book at least twice and footnote your quotations using the Chicago Style. Your first footnote must be in full Chicago style including the page number, but then you should shorten the footnotes while always giving the page number. If you are using an e-book with no page numbers then use the letter or chapter numbers. Footnotes are also for ideas or paraphrases of the book as well as direct quotations. Do not use outside sources. All your footnotes should refer to Traills book. Put the footnote numbers after the periods at the ends of the sentences.

Watch an episode or movie where the main characters have sex* and respond to the following questions:
1. Summarize your movie/show: What did you watch? How is sex depicted in this TV show/movie? [6 points for Content rubric criteria]
2. Expectations: Is this what we expect sex to be like? Is it usually like this? [6 points for Content rubric criteria]
3. Connecting to “real life”: Is it consistent with what we learned about in this course thus far? Are our expectations for sexual activity too high or too low? How might these expectations lead to unhappiness in a real relationship? [8 points for Content rubric criteria]
*Note: I’m definitely not asking you to watch porn. The show or movie does not have to show explicit scenes for you to know the characters had sex.

Analyze the article you selected by responding to the following questions:
Briefly, what were the research method, the purpose of the study, and the main finding(s)? As this is a brief statement of the main finding(s), do not provide details such as means or other statistics.
What potential threats are there, if any, to the study’s external validity or generalizability? What about the study, if anything, enhances its external validity or generalizability?
Do you have any concerns regarding whether the study was conducted ethically? Explain in terms of the information you learned in the assigned readings (e.g., informed consent).
Recall this week’s Discussion Spark about various prosocial behaviors. What prosocial behavior or act could increase understanding of, or provide support to someone dealing with the issues presented in your selected journal article? The prosocial behavior could be something described in the journal article, explored in the Discussion Spark, or a prosocial behavior that has not previously been mentioned in the course.
What theory or concept described in Chapter 11 explains the motive for this prosocial behavior?
What personal quality of an individual or situational determinant would increase the likelihood of this prosocial behavior occurring?
(I wrote about dieting in the Discussion Spark for prosocial behavior examples)

In your paper,
Discuss how a job description is a function of management.
Consider the following areas of a job description below and explain how these components contribute to an effective performance management system:
Tasks
Tools and technology
Knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs)
Education requirements
Explain the legal components in a job description as it relates to the EEOC.
Describe at least two assessment methods (resumes, interviews, application forms, testing, reference checks, honesty tests, medical exams, and drug screening)
that can be used when recruiting qualified candidates and how those two methods are appropriate for meeting organizational objectives.

Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Students name
Course name and number
Instructors name
Date submitted
Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph.

Must use at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed, or credible sources Must document any information used from sources in APA style Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style

Please submit your Final Research paper exploring your chosen aspect of Self-Discovery/Self-Realization here.
Your 5-7 page, double spaced, MLA formatted argumentative research paper should be uploaded as a .docx or .pdf file.
Within this rubric, you can potentially gain 6 points in each of the five areas for a maximum of 30 points. Be guided accordingly to include the following:
i) Your Own Original Title and Thesis statement/sentence that clearly tell your stance on the topic,
ii) Critical thought defending your thesis that strives to go beyond the superficial and obvious,
iii) Well-structured, organized ideas logically presented in complete sentences and fully-developed paragraphs. Said ideas must be supported with your original reasoning and relevant references (both paraphrased and quoted) from the text,
iv) Appropriate vocabulary for the seriousness of the topic and your college-level reading audience
v) Correct spelling and punctuation.

What is an outline? Why do you need it?
An outline is a logical way of organizing contents of your research to present your ideas and provide the most effective connection among various parts of your essay. In the absence of a proper outline, you will not only overlook certain critical points but also confuse the reader once you compile your final document. Drafting an outline may consume an extra 15-20 minutes, but might save you from a lot of trouble in the longer run.
Components of an Outline!
To better help you organize your research, your outline should have the following three major components:
I. Introduction
II. Body
III. Conclusion
A good outline will help you start off from the intro and gradually move smoothly towards the conclusion.
How to create an outline?
Once you have identified the above-mentioned components, you can now split them further into categories and subcategories to include minor details. Remember an outline is only there to help you give form to your ideas. Part of giving form to those ideas is recognizing the distinct parts of your argument. Each of these distinct but connected parts should be addressed in its own subtitled section within the body of your essay. Conceivably, your body can consist of 2-4 subsections for a 5-7 page paper. Experienced writers often write a set of subtitles/subheads first because its an ideal way to organize complex information and work efficiently. Subtitles have been a winning formula for organizing my own written work and long projects, so I strongly recommend subtitling your paper. In a recent presentation, I gave, Seu Cabelo Revela: Towards Decolonizing Afro-Brazilian Hair, for example, the body was organized around 3 subtitles:
i) The Roots of Black Hair in Brazil
ii) Creeping, Then Running, Towards Blackness
iii) Arts Role in The Rise of Cabelo Black Power
For this particular stage of your research planning, think of the body of your work. What 3-5 subtitles would make sense in organizing your paper?