Provide a statement that explains how your personal experiences and history will allow you to contribute to the wealth of perspectives in the entering class of the school and the university in large

Assignment Question

This is a personal statement for my phd application at schools such as columbia, harvard, cornell, uc berkeley. The word limit for these schools is 500 word. In addition to personal statement editing, I am off the word count by about more 1000 words, and I can’t seem to make it 500 as I am not sure what to keep and remove. here are some insights from their prompts:

Prompt 1: “we ask that you provide a statement that explains how your personal experiences and history will allow you to contribute to the wealth of perspectives in the entering class of the school and the university in large.”

Prompt 2: “The personal statement should give concrete evidence of your promise as a member of the academic community, giving the committee an image of you as a person. This is also where you represent your potential to bring to your academic career a critical perspective rooted in a non-traditional educational background, or your understanding of the experiences of groups historically under-represented in higher education and your commitment to increase participation by a diverse population in higher education.”

Based upon the program you’ve been developing, create a brief program descriiption to guide the evaluation plan.

Assignment Question

1. Describing the program is a critical step in conducting an evaluation. Based upon the program you’ve been developing, create a brief program descriiption to guide the evaluation plan. Be sure to include the following elements: the need the program is addressing; the targets of the program; at least one outcome of the program; at least one program activity; at least one output of the program activity; and at least one resource or input needed. Complete your post by describing the relationship between the program activities and outcomes.

Walk through the logical framework (LogFrame) and to create the project management documents needed to successfully lead a project

Assignment Question

The purpose of this Case Study assignment is to walk through the logical framework (LogFrame) and to create the project management documents needed to successfully lead a project. Read the Kitchen Heaven Project Case Study in Heldman et al. pages 84-87 and complete the following: Part 1: Logical Framework Template Column A Complete the Goal, Purpose, and Outcomes (the green portion Column A) of the Logical Framework template.

NOTE: Do not rely on the content or wording in the Project Case Study Checklist (page 86). Your work should be original and based upon your understanding of the full scenario presented in the case. Successfully completing the Logical Framework will yield different results. The case provides the information required to complete each assignment but leaves room for individual interpretation and assumptions. One Goal statement is expected. One Purpose statement is expected. A minimum of three outcome statements are expected. The Goal, Purpose, and Outcome statements must be stated using the “Objective = Action Verb + Object” format. Refer to Schmidt pages 34-40 for details. Part 2: Project Charter Using the information in the Logical Framework template and the case, complete the Project Charter.

Write a personal statement applying through UCAS to some universities in London.

Assignment Question

Write a personal statement applying through UCAS to some universities in London.

Use the following information: Assume you are currently studying at king’s college London as a foundation student.

Visit three or more of the websites listed in Figure 2.3 of the Tyminski textbook. Find one resource from each site and share information you find on these sites that you think will be particularly helpful to you as early childhood teachers.

Assignment Question

Visit three or more of the websites listed in Figure 2.3 of the Tyminski textbook. Find one resource from each site and share information you find on these sites that you think will be particularly helpful to you as early childhood teachers.Remember to connect to and cite course-related materials in proper APA format in your response.

Write a 1,000-1,250-word data analysis paper outlining the procedures used to analyze the parametric and nonparametric variables in the mock data, the statistics reported, and a conclusion of the results.

Assignment Question

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Use the “Comparison Table of the Variable’s Level of Measurement,” located in the DNP-830A folder of the DNP PI Workspace, to complete the assignment. Review the “Working with Inferential Statistics” and “Working With Descriptive Statistics” tutorials, located in the DNP-830A folder of the DNP PI Workspace, for assistance as needed. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.

Part 1:

Using the data in the “Comparison Table of the Variable’s Level of Measurement” display the dependent variables and the level of measurement in a comparison table. You will attach the comparison table as an appendix to your paper. After downloading the data set, run the appropriate statistics in SPSS based on the steps listed below. Provide a conclusive result of the data analyses based on the guidelines below for statistical significance. PAIRED SAMPLE T-TEST: Identify the variables BaselineWeight and InterventionWeight. Using the Analysis menu in SPSS, go to Compare Means, Go to the Paired Sample t-test. Add the BaselineWeight and InterventionWeight in the Pair 1 fields. Click OK. Report the mean weights, standard deviations, t-statistic, degrees of freedom, and p level. Report as t(df)=value, p = value. Report the p level out three digits. INDEPENDENT SAMPLE T-TEST: Identify the variables InterventionGroups and PatientWeight. Go to the Analysis Menu, go to Compare Means, Go to Independent Samples t T-test. Add InterventionGroups to the Grouping Factor. Define the groups according to codings in the variable view (1=Intervention, 2 =Baseline). Add PatientWeight to the test variable field. Click OK. Report the mean weights, standard deviations, t-statistic, degrees of freedom, and p level. Report t(df)=value, p = value. Report the p level out three digits CHI-SQUARE (Independent): Identify the variables BaselineReadmission and InterventionReadmission. Go to the Analysis Menu, go to Descriptive Statistics, go to Crosstabs. Add BaselineReadmission to the row and InterventionReadmission to the column. Click the Statistics button and choose Chi-Square. Select eta to report the Effect Size. Click suppress tables. Click OK. Report the frequencies of the total events, the chi-square statistic, degrees of freedom, and p Report ꭓ2 (df) =value, p =value. Report the p level out three digits. MCNEMAR (Paired): Identify the variables BaselineCompliance and Go to the Analysis Menu, go to Descriptive Statistics, go to Crosstabs. Add BaselineCompliance to the row and InterventionCompliance to the column. Click the Statistics button and choose Chi-Square and McNemars. Select eta to report the Effect Size. Click suppress tables. Click OK. Report the frequencies of the events, the Chi-square, and the McNemar’s p level. Report (p =value). Report the p level out three digits. MANN WHITNEY U: Identify the variables InterventionGroups and Using the Analysis Menu, go to Nonparametric Statistics, go to Legacy Dialogs, go to 2 Independent samples. Add InterventionGroups to the Grouping Variable and PatientSatisfaction to the Test Variable. Check Mann Whitney U. Click OK. Report the Medians or Means, the Mann Whitney U statistic, and the p level. Report (U =value, p =value). Report the p level out three digits. WILCOXON Z: Identify the variables BaselineWeight and InterventionWeight. Go to the Analysis Menu, go to Nonparametric Statistics, go to LegacyDialogs, go to 2 Related samples. Add the BaselineWeight and InterventionWeight in the Pair 1 fields. Click OK. Report the Mean or Median weights, standard deviations, Z-statistic, and p Report as (Z =value, p =value). Report the p level out three digits.

Part 2

Write a 1,000-1,250-word data analysis paper outlining the procedures used to analyze the parametric and nonparametric variables in the mock data, the statistics reported, and a conclusion of the results. Include the following in your paper: Discussion of the types of statistical tests used and why they have been chosen. Discussion of the differences between parametric and nonparametric tests. Description of the reported results of the statistical tests above. Summary of the conclusive results of the data analyses. Attach the SPSS outputs from the statistical analysis as an appendix to the paper. Attach the “Comparison Table of the Variable’s Level of Measurement” as an appendix to the paper.

Use the following guidelines to report the test results for your paper: Statistically Significant Difference: When reporting exact p values, state early in the data analysis and results section, the alpha level used for the significance criterion for all tests in the project. Example: An alpha or significance level of < .05 was used for all statistical tests in the project. Then if the p-level is less than this value identified, the result is considered statistically significant. A statistically significant difference was noted between the scores before compared to after the intervention t(24) = 2.37, p = .007. Marginally Significant Difference: If the results are found in the predicted direction but are not statistically significant, indicate that results were marginally Example: Scores indicated a marginally significant preference for the intervention group (M = 3.54, SD = 1.20) compared to the baseline (M= 3.10, SD = .90), t(24) = 1.37, p = .07. Or there was a marginal difference in readmissions before (15) compared to after (10) the intervention ꭓ2(1) = 4.75, p = .06. Nonsignificant Trend: If the p-value is over .10, report results revealed a non-significant trend in the predicted direction. Example: Results indicated a non-significant trend for the intervention group (14) over the baseline (12), ꭓ2(1) = 1.75, p = .26. The results of the inferential analysis are used for decision-making and not hypothesis testing. It is important to look at the real results and establish what criterion is necessary for further implementation of the project’s findings. These conclusions are a start.

What are some of the truth claims that apply to the groups of people with whom you work with Severe Substance Addiction? How do those truth claims change based on the level at which you practice (micro, mezzo, or macro)?

Assignment Question

Role of Theoretical Knowledge in Practice at All Levels

Healy (2014) discusses the relationship between discourse and practice by noting that “truth claims” have shaped our notions of practice. Truth claims are assertions that the system holds to be true and shape our understanding of service users’ needs but may not always be true. Address the following: What are some of the truth claims that apply to the groups of people with whom you work with Severe Substance Addiction? How do those truth claims change based on the level at which you practice (micro, mezzo, or macro)? Has this helped or hurt the client group with which you interact? How might your readings on discourse and theoretical orientations influence the continued development of your leadership qualities? Reading Resources Healy, K. (2014). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice (2nd ed.). Red Globe Press. Chapter 1, “Understanding our Context,” pages 1–11. Refer to the following resource: Week 1: Reclaiming a Theoretical Orientation to Reflection in Medical Education Research: A Critical Narrative Review Links to an external site.. Please provide hanging indent on your references and spell out numbers under 10 when used in a sentence and do not forget to italicize all references as per APA guidelines.

Write a two page executive summary of the findings and recommendations related to your organizational information system change project.

Assignment Question

Write a two page executive summary of the findings and recommendations related to your organizational information system change project. Create an Excel or Word table that outlines a project management implementation plan and an audio memo of three minutes or fewer to explain your plan to stakeholders. create an implementation plan for the organizational information system change. This plan should leverage the discoveries and feedback that came out of the stakeholder needs assessment meeting. The strategies you define for the interprofessional team with the implementation and go live of the information system will help to guide their successful use, and provide sustainability of the system change. Having successfully completed your needs assessment meeting, you have gathered the necessary stakeholder information for your information systems change project. For the next step in your project, you have been asked to submit a written summary of the findings and recommendations from your needs assessment meeting. Additionally, you have been asked to create an implementation plan outline and an audio memo to help explain the plan to relevant stakeholders in the organization. For this assessment, you will prepare two parts. Part 1 will be a written executive summary. Part 2 will be a project management implementation plan outline and an audio memo.

Part 1: Executive Summary Your executive summary should be a Word document of no longer than 2 pages. The content of your executive summary should include: The current informatics structure in the organization. What you recommend moving forward to complete the project related to informatics roles, project champions, and support for the implementation plan. The current clinical information system and what you recommend as the change to the system. Define what you anticipate to be improvements for patient safety and health care outcomes with the system change and implementation.

Part 2: Project Management Implementation Plan Document and speakers notes Create your project management implementation plan document in Excel, a Word table, or other program of your choice. Include the following components: The overall goal or goals for the project. Include 1–2 goals. The major milestones that need to be completed to achieve the goals. Include 2–3 milestones for each goal. The processes that will be developed and completed to achieve the milestones. Include 2–3 processes for each milestone. The steps you will need to complete each process. Include 2–3 steps for each process. The timeline for project completion. Include one timeline showing the goals, milestones, processes, and steps. Responsible parties (project champions and informatics team) for each step, process, milestone, and goal. Your speakers notes should describe the project implementation plan to the stakeholders and help them to create buy-in and raise awareness of the information system change. The stakeholders include the end-users, project champions, and informatics team working on the project. Comment on specific change management strategies that could help the stakeholders you are addressing as they communicate with their colleagues about the project.

Executive Summary Length: 2 pages, not including the title and reference page. APA Style and Format: Use APA formatting with a title page, running head, title on the first page of text, level 1 headings, and a reference list. Number of References: Include 4–5 scholarly sources used as parenthetical citations and in a reference list. Implementation Plan: Create an Excel or Word table to illustrate your implementation plan.

Create a 3 to 5-minute screen recorder video presentation. State your finalized interventional PICOT clinical question. Using evidence from the articles, briefly explain two reasons why this topic should be investigated.

Assignment Question

 In this assignment, you will complete an Evidence Video Presentation using the clinical PICOT question and 3 peer-reviewed research articles approved in the Unit 4 assignment.

You will create a 3 to 5-minute screen recorder video presentation (on camera recording your screen). To complete this assignment: Use a video screencast recorder such as ScreenpAL, Microsoft Stream, or similar software to record your presentation. Review the guides: ScreenPal’s Screen Recorder and Microsoft Stream Screen Recording. You may use Prezi, Microsoft Sway or PowerPoint, Keynote, Google Slide or similar software to create the presentation content.

Video Presentation: Integrate the following 3 sources throughout the presentation by paraphrasing the evidence with APA formatted in-text citations: The 3 approved research articles. The assigned course textbook. In your 4 to 5-minute screencast video presentation, include the following 11 slides (including title and references): Title Slide a) Title of presentation (be creative with your title) b) Full name c) Name of Institution d) Date Introduction a) Introduce your topic. b) Share your interest or connection to the topic. c) State the purpose of the presentation.

Clinical Question: State your finalized interventional PICOT clinical question. Justification: Using evidence from the articles, briefly explain two reasons why this topic should be investigated.

Evidence-Based Practice Model: Use your textbook as a source to select one evidence-based practice model: a) Identify and describe the evidence-based practice model. b) Discuss why you selected the model (provide in-text citations to support your claims). c) Identify one key stakeholder and explain how this stakeholder relates to your topic or proposed project.

Summary of Evidence: Create an evidence table on a single slide to summarize the 3 research articles by using the sample table shown below. Briefly explain the study design, purpose, sample, methods, and findings for each study.

Analysis of Evidence: In your presentation, provide an analysis of the data by verbally explaining: a) What two patterns in the data can you identify? (Consider the sample and its size, study methods, and whether it is appropriate to test the data, similarities/differences in the findings/concepts/themes). b) What is one strength of the data and why? c) What is one limitation of the data and why?

Recommendations for Practice: Based on the data and findings, briefly discuss two recommendations for enhancing clinical practice with the use of supportive evidence from the articles.

Recommendations for Research: Based on the research methods, briefly discuss two recommendations for future research with the use of supportive evidence from the textbook.

Conclusions: State how the evidence you found support your clinical question.

References: Formatted in APA style to include the 3 research articles and assigned course textbook (you do not need to narrate the references slide). Ensure to include in-text citations thoughout the presentation to credit your sources.