Discuss how to appropriately adapt the presentations message, and delivery method for gaining support from multiple audiences-Differentiate specific appropriate, legal and ethical standards for delivering your message to the target audience.

Assignment Question

Identify the key stake holders other than the transportation company with whom you would need to interact in order to affect meaningful change to the service, your client and other service receive. In other words, who do you need to influence to ensure your clients transportation needs are being met adequately. Discuss how to appropriately adapt the presentations message, and delivery method for gaining support from multiple audiences. Based on your research of available transportation options discuss how you will probably adapt the presentation message, and the most appropriate delivery Method for garnering support from various audiences. For example, you might adapt this presentation for public officials, client state administrators, or your own colleagues in order to cover this element comprehensively, ensure that you selected least one other audience. In addition to the transportation company you have already covered. Differentiate specific, social and cultural factors, appropriate to deliver your message to diverse audiences. In other words how will you communicate the intending message most effectively to a diverse population of audience members. Differentiate specific appropriate, legal and ethical standards for delivering your message to the target audience. For example, what information might you be able to legally ethically share with one group that you might be unable to share with another group? How would these considerations affect the message that you plan to deliver?

Analyzing Quality Improvement-Describe a quality improvement initiative that is currently being monitored in your workplace. Research quality improvement initiatives in your workplace. (just something nursing related )

Assignment Question

Describe a quality improvement initiative that is currently being monitored in your workplace. Research quality improvement initiatives in your workplace. (just something nursing related ).

Week 15 theory

Assignment Question

After reading the passage below from Chinn & Kramer, 2022, p 61 (previous textbook) Re-read the emancipatory knowing article used for patterns paper by Peart & MacKinnon in Brightspace. Write about a nursing situation that you observed (or have been a part of) and believed to be unfair or wrong. It must be a different situation than your Patterns of Knowing Paper. After describing the situation, answer the four critical questions of emancipatory knowing – you must follow the example below with bolding: ‘What is wrong with this picture (what are your perceptions/beliefs about it)?’ ‘Who benefits (from keeping things the same/the status quo)?’ ‘What are the barriers to freedom (preventing the situation from changing)?’ ‘What changes are needed (real suggestions to address it)?’ Required preparation: Read the passage below from Chinn & Kramer, 2022, p 61 (previous textbook) Re-read the emancipatory knowing article used for patterns paper by Peart & MacKinnon in Brightspace The creative processes for developing emancipatory knowledge grow from the critical questions of emancipatory knowing. These critical questions are: What is wrong with this picture? Who benefits? What are the barriers to freedom? What changes are needed? These questions can be asked in a variety of contexts and situations, including the context of care. The questions on the model are suggestions, but any question that focuses on bringing social injustices into awareness is also a critical question. When you ask the critical questions associated with emancipatory knowing, an underlying assumption is that people are not free to choose from among an unlimited variety of options, and that things need to change to make new options accessible to everyone. To assume that people are free places the responsibility for developing one’s full potential totally with the individual. Critical questioning assumes that freedoms are situated, which means that the possibilities for freedom and the development of individual potential are determined by a person’s situation. In other words, from a critical perspective, a person’s situation is assumed to be constructed by social practices that create disadvantage for some and privilege for others.

From an emancipatory perspective, any conditions that limit people from developing their full human potential can be made visible, what is imagined can become real, and humans have the innate capacity to bring about changes to improve the human condition. Asking a critical question such as “What is wrong with this picture?” requires a lens that sees beyond the obvious and beyond one’s own personal experience. This makes it possible to discern problems that may exist with what people assume to be true. Recognizing injustices and inequities can create major personal and professional dilemmas. Most people are socialized to accept an unfair status quo as the way things are (hegemony) and not to question the uncomfortable fact that some people are privileged and others are disadvantaged. To bring this kind of awareness to the surface and to act on it requires great courage, persistence, and the support of colleagues and allies who remain committed to action. Taking action often disturbs the status quo in ways that are not only uncomfortable but also prompt harsh and swift action to keep prevailing hegemonies in place. Nonetheless, critically questioning the status quo is an initial and critical feature of emancipatory knowing that sets the stage for praxis. Why Is This Important? When nurses question why something seems unfair, they are operating under the assumption that all persons deserve the freedom and opportunity to develop their full potential. Such questions assume that developing and exercising one’s potential is not solely a matter of individual will or desire, but that culture and society create conditions and structures within which people can thrive or fail to thrive. Reference Chinn, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (2022). Knowledge development in nursing: Theory and process (11th ed.). Elsevier.

A Qualitative Study on the Role of Mentorship in Addressing Underrepresentation of Minority Women in Leadership

Assignment Question

A Qualitative Study on the Role of Mentorship in Addressing Under-representation of Minority Women in Leadership

see attach paper for references. Only do 2 pages for literature review, I will request more pages after reviewing. Instructions: Synthesis of the scholarly literature Synthesizing scholarly literature involves analyzing and integrating information from multiple sources to develop a comprehensive understanding of your research topic. It allows you to identify patterns, gaps, and trends in the existing literature and establish the context for your research. In this section, you will

• _Describe how the literature supports the exploration of the topic

• _Identify themes and commonalities in the literature

• _Analyze and compare different perspectives – identify areas of agreement, disagreement, or debate among authors

• _Identify gaps and unresolved issues and how your study sought to address them

• _Critically analyze, evaluate, and interpret the literature on your topic Use recent scholarly references from the last five years or so, plus additional seminal research if needed. To adequately cover the richness of your topic and determine the extent to which your topic and the problem have been previously addressed, a thorough capstone literature review generally analyzes 35 to 45 references supporting your study. As ever, it is important to paraphrase, summarize, quote, and then accurately cite and reference the sources you use to ensure proper attribution and avoid plagiarism. As you synthesize the scholarly literature, consider the following points:

• _What scholarly researchers in the literature discussed/addressed the topic, problem, and gap in practice? Focus your attention far more on current scholarly literature, as some problems today were not even known concepts 20-30 years ago.

• _How have scholarly researchers discussed the topic and attempted to address the problem?

• _What patterns, trends, and themes emerged?

• _Who built on the prior work of other scholarly researchers?

• _What were the degrees of success or failure in overcoming the problem?

• _What were the areas of agreement, disagreement, and conflicting positions of scholarly researchers previously addressing the problem? How are they similar? How are they different? • _What data collection techniques have been used previously?

• _What data collection instruments have been used previously?

• _What were the results? What were the findings?

Analyze the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an appreciative inquiry (AI) and a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) approach.

Assignment Question

Identifying analysis techniques for assessing competitive advantage is important for building health care strategy. Sustaining health care competitive advantage requires that leaders understand environmental demands to assist with minimizing weakness and threats from the external environment. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to examine your health care environment to determine whether what is being accomplished in your organization, department, team, community project, or other care setting is making a positive difference. Preparation Note: You will use the results of this analysis to develop a strategic plan in Assessment 2. You have been asked to conduct an analysis of your care setting that will result in two potential pathways toward a strategic plan to improve health care quality and safety in your organization, department, team, community project, or other care setting. To accomplish this, you will take two approaches to the analysis: Complete the discovery and dream phases of an appreciative inquiry (AI) project. Conduct a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis. To help ensure that your analysis is well-received, the requester has suggested that you: Present your analysis results in four parts:

Part 1: Appreciative Inquiry Discovery and Dream.

Part 2: SWOT Analysis. Part 3: Comparison of Approaches. Part 4: Analysis of Relevant Leadership Characteristics and Skills. Your analysis should be 4–7 pages in length. Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page. As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment. One key aspect to being an effective leader, manager, or administrator is an awareness of your leadership strengths, weaknesses, and style. How would you assess your general leadership, communication, and relationship-building skills? How would describe your leadership style? Imagine the future for a care setting that is your place of practice or one in which you would like to work. What aspirational goals can you envision that would lead to improvements in health care quality and safety? How well do these goals align with the mission, vision, and values of your care setting? Analysis Requirements Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so at a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style Communicate professionally when conducting interviews and collecting data. Write clearly, with professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues. Integrate relevant sources of evidence to support your assertions. Cite at least 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence. Include relevant interview information. Format your document using APA style. Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]. Be sure to include: A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required. A running head on all pages. Appropriate section headings. Properly formatted citations and references. Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult to focus on the substance of your analysis. Part 1: Appreciative Inquiry Discovery and Dream Synthesize stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals. Collect stories from your care setting. You may collect stories through interviews or conversations with colleagues or provide your own. Explain how your stories are related to quality and safety goals. Describe the evidence you have that substantiates your stories. Identify the positive themes reflected in your stories. Describe other evidence (for example: data, awards, accreditations) that validates your care setting’s positive core. Propose positive, yet attainable, quality and safety improvement goals for your care setting. Explain how accomplishing these goals will lead to ethical and culturally-sensitive improvements in quality and safety. Explain how your proposed goals align with your care setting’s mission, vision, and values. Part 2: SWOT Analysis Conduct a SWOT analysis of your care setting, with respect to quality and safety goals. Provide a narrative description of your analysis. Identify the assessment tool you used as the basis of your analysis. Describe your key findings and their relationships to quality and safety goals. Describe one area of concern that you identified in your SWOT analysis—relevant to your care setting’s mission, vision, and values—for which you would propose pursuing improvements. Explain how this area of concern relates to your care setting’s mission, vision, and values. Explain why you believe it will be necessary and valuable to pursue improvements related to this area of concern.

Part 3: Comparison of Approaches Compare the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis and reflect on the results. Describe your mindset when examining your care setting from an AI perspective and from a SWOT perspective. Describe the types of data and evidence you searched for when taking an AI approach and a SWOT approach. Describe the similarities and differences between the two approaches when communicating and interacting with colleagues. Part 4: Analysis of Relevant Leadership Characteristics and Skills Analyze the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an AI and SWOT approach. Explain how these characteristics and skills would help a leader facilitate a successful AI-based project and a successful SWOT-based project. Comment on any shared characteristics or skills you identified as helpful for both AI and SWOT approaches. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Evaluate qualities and skills that promote effective leadership within health care organizations. Analyze the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an appreciative inquiry (AI) and a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) approach. Competency 2: Apply strategies to lead high-performing health care teams to meet organizational quality and safety goals. Synthesize stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals. Conduct a SWOT analysis of a care setting, with respect to quality and safety goals. Describe an area of concern identified in a SWOT analysis—relevant to a care setting’s mission, vision, and values—that should be improved. Compare the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis with regard to data gathering and interactions with others. Competency 3: Apply cultural, ethical, and regulatory considerations to leadership decision making. Propose positive, attainable quality and safety improvement goals for a care setting. Competency 5: Communicate with stakeholders and constituencies to build collaborative partnerships and create inclusive work environments. Communicate analyses clearly and in a way that demonstrates professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

The Taxation System of the East India Company (1700s)-Discuss the history of the East India Company’s tax systems as well as its influence on today’s systems or how it compares to today’s. But it mostly has to explore the tax system of the East India Company in the 1700s, you can get creative with other aspects of the era or systems

Assignment Question

Discuss the history of the East India Company’s tax systems as well as its influence on today’s systems or how it compares to today’s. But it mostly has to explore the tax system of the East India Company in the 1700s, you can get creative with other aspects of the era or systems. At least 3 sources NEED to be used; I am including two below, and a third one by link (hopefully it works), please include more if you need to reach the 6-page limit. I am going to add a link here to a text online. When it asks to select an institution, Select Loyola Marymount University. If it does not work for you,  let me know I can find another source if you need me to. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1010409440?accountid=7418&parentSessionId=dv%2FPrf8atqW9uMCGhHIUjXvnla0vmFE%2BB4W0X5%2FWU44%3D&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses

Give each chapter another look and answer the questions the scoring guide/rubric asks

Assignment Question

Final Journal (Counseling Skills Reflection Paper) requires at least 6 pages of content, and double-spaced throughout. Section it off using the 12 Headers (Introduction, Personal Journey,…Conclusion). You do not need a cover (title) or reference page, but if you do, they are not counted towards the 6 page minimum. Give each chapter another look and answer the questions the scoring guide/rubric asks. This will show me you understand each of the counseling skills and techniques we went over this semester. Textbook used for this course is “Learning the Art of Helping,” by Mark Young, 7th edition.

Write a paper discussing how to end cyberbullying.

Assignment Question

Write a paper discussing how to end cyberbullying.

Add 4 pages to what has already been done and make sure we stay on topic, you may change around first few pages if necessary.

Drawing from Kraft and Furlong ch 3 -indicate the types of policy instrument(s) in the policy proposal or enacted policy AND which policy type it is. Does this address the problem YOU defined in the week 4 memo or in the paragraph you wrote for week 6 if you are doing heat/climate?

Assignment Question

This is not a memo! Just write the number (1, 2, or 3) and copy in the bullets below and put the relevant information for each.

First, some really specific instructions:

1. Go to https://legistar.council.nyc.gov/Legislation.aspx . Where it says “All years,” choose one of the sessions – either the current one or the prior one. Enter a search term such as e-bikes. Choose an item. You will submit in your assignment the # type (Finding an Introduction “type” is a little better than a resolution – a resolution just expresses and opinion) status (if enacted, give the date) a brief description of what it does (This will be in the “title,” or you may want to click on the number to get more information. (you might want to save the summary, any reports, or other items for later). the committee(s) to which it was referred if relevant the web link. Drawing from Kraft and Furlong ch 3 -indicate the types of policy instrument(s) in the policy proposal or enacted policy AND which policy type it is (per Lowi, as described by Kraft and Furlong).. Does this address the problem YOU defined in the week 4 memo or in the paragraph you wrote for week 6 if you are doing heat/climate?

2. Policies across states  Go to Legislative News, Studies and Analysis | National Conference of State Legislatures (ncsl.org). Type a search term in and see if anything comes back that describes a proposed or enacted policy that would address the problem you identified earlier (heat/climate/congestion/pollution/electric bikes). Choose one state-level policy about your topic that is discussed in the results. You will submit in your assignment the following, just about one policy. They write blogs and reports about different ideas that are being proposed across states as well as enacted policies (laws). the jurisdiction (state) the status of the policy (enacted? proposed?) with the date. an explanation what it does, An APA-style reference for what you read (a report? blog? web page). Include the web link. Drawing from Kraft and Furlong ch 3 – indicate the types of policy instrument(s) in the policy proposal or enacted policy AND which policy type it is (per Lowi, as described by Kraft and Furlong).. Does this address the problem YOU defined in the week 4 memo or in the paragraph you wrote for week 6 if you are doing heat/climate?

3. Go to Home | City & State New York (cityandstateny.com) OR Building Better Cities – Urban Transportation and Housing News (nextcity.org) Find a news article about policy that would address the problem you have defined. You will submit just the APA reference for this.

4. Answer this: how easy or difficult was it to answer items 1 and 2? Did you have to overcome any challenges to do so and if so how did you?

Pick an economic policy and write a 8 page paper discussing on the selected economic policy.

Assignment Question

Pick an economic policy and write a 8 page paper discussing on the selected economic policy.