Providing substantive comments that include personal or real-world examples and backing up claims and assertions with relevant sources What are your key takeaways from this week’s readings?

Read the attached readings, and In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board question below.

Providing substantive comments that include personal or real-world examples and backing up claims and assertions with relevant sources What are your key takeaways from this week’s readings?

Please upload the post to Grammarly.com and correct all errors for a Grammarly score of 99 or 100.

Write a 1000 word essay about themes relevant in Brave New World. You can write about any themes you like or you can use ones I found such as “using pleasure to drown out the real world” “the dehumanization of relationships” “sensory overload and distractoin”

Assignment Question

Write a 1000 word essay about themes relevant in Brave New World. You can write about any themes you like or you can use ones Found such as “using pleasure to drown out the real world” “the dehumanization of relationships” “sensory overload and distraction”. You also need citations from the book and at least two more outside sources.

Describe setting, number of children, ages of children, time of day and any other relevant information. Describe the overall lesson with the children.

Assignment Question

LESSON PLAN IMPLEMENTATION & REFLECTION (20 points)

Put your lesson plan in place with at least one child. The child could be someone you know if there are three other children NOT related to you in any way.

After you implement your lesson plan, write a one- page reflection with the following requirements: Describe setting, number of children, ages of children, time of day and any other relevant information. Describe the overall lesson with the children. How did it go? Did it go well? What went well? What would you change, why? Were they at the expected age of math knowledge? How do you know?

Remember to include the theorists and big ideas we have discussed in class as you analyze and reflect on your experience.

What have you learned about self-change and positive psychology? What would you do differently if you had the chance to do it again? Why?

Assignment Question

Procrastination

Part I: The Self-Improvement Project

You should write this up in the form of an empirical psychology paper. Use APA to format your paper and cite your sources. Refer to the APA Guidelines in the Course Information for information on APA. Be sure to include the following sections in your paper:

Introduction: Why did you decide to change what you (hopefully) changed? What factors facilitated and impeded this change?

Methods: explain how you went about changing yourself. What techniques did you use?

Results: What happened? You must present evidence here beyond your own impressions. A narrative addressing your successes and failures, reports from friends and family on the changes you made, etc. would be appropriate.

For example: unsolicited comments such as, “Hey, you’re smiling so much more these past few weeks. What’s your secret?”), objective health indicators (e.g., fewer sick days used), and behavioral measures are all appropriate.

Discussion: What have you learned about self-change and positive psychology? What would you do differently if you had the chance to do it again? Why? You might talk about your strengths and weaknesses, difficulties of changing one’s self, the importance of recognizing your ideal self as an evolving and developing individual.

Part II: Your Ideal Future, or Future Self

The focus of positive psychology is to help you think clearly about who you are and what you want, or should want. People often fall into traps and pursue goals that leave themselves worse off, even when they are successful. We began the term with an activity addressing our strengths and weaknesses, and throughout the term we considered a variety of aspects of happiness, virtue, and personal growth. Now that we are at the end of this course, you should know a lot more about yourself, your strengths and weaknesses, what makes you happy, what you want for your future, and how you want to change your future self. In this part of the final paper, sketch out a vision of your future life, or future self. Drawing on many of the readings for the semester, explain why this life would be a pleasant life, a good life, or a meaningful life. Talk about what growth would mean for you and the means by which you hope to grow into your future self. Talk about limits and obstacles as well as about facilitators.

Here are some general comments about the final paper The most important thing about this paper is to show me that you have learned to think like a positive psychologist. Be sure to draw on many of the readings and ideas that came up in class discussions. minimum of 4 double-spaced pages for the main text. Appendices, such as charts of progress or daily data recording sheets, should be included in addition.  At least one (1) reference (not including your textbook or in-course readings) must be included. You should use first person throughout; this is of course a very personal paper in both parts.

Describe how the theory you selected can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation. Explain how the theory guides social work practice both with individuals and families.

Assignment Question

Week 10 Assignment: Integrating Theory Into Professional Practice Week 10 Assignment: Integrating Theory

For this assignment, you will draw on the work you did in previous assignments for week 3 and 6 and integrate all you have learned into a clear and concise application of your chosen theory to the particular case of Joe the King. As with all assignments, it is vital to support the application of your chosen theory with scholarly research.

For this assignment you should: Describe how the theory you selected can be used to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation. Explain how the theory guides social work practice both with individuals and families. Integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge and practice wisdom. Critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment. Provide documented examples that support the application of your chosen theory to this particular case study.

Additional Requirements The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements: Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting. Number of resources: Minimum of three scholarly sources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years. Length of paper: Minimum of four typed, double-spaced, typed pages. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

What characterizes their use of language? How do critics describe their work? This paper may involve reading a biographical essay on your author, looking at some of the primary critical works about that author, selecting works to examine, and finding your own theme and approach to the subject.

Respond to this prompt: Poets use language to create an experience ordinary language can’t. They do this by making their language strange, weird, contradictory, and even violent.

Choose either Sylvia Plath, Edgar Allan Poe or Emily Dickinson — one, not all of them.

What characterizes their use of language? How do critics describe their work? This paper may involve reading a biographical essay on your author, looking at some of the primary critical works about that author, selecting works to examine, and finding your own theme and approach to the subject.

Do not use any sources that haven’t been peer reviewed. Use reliable sources. Use file as inspo for some of your background.

Write a paper of no more than 500 words, explaining what epistemic and testimonial injustice are, and whether or not it occurred in the Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp trial.

Assignment Question

Extra Credit Short Paper (Epistemic Injustice) This is an entirely optional extra credit assignment. It will be graded on a pass/fail basis. If passed, it will add up to 30 points to your lowest paper grade at the end of term.

Epistemic Injustice Explained & Applied: you must write a paper of no more than 500 words, explaining what epistemic and testimonial injustice are, and whether or not it occurred in the Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp trial.

Your paper must: (i) explain epistemic & testimonial injustice (provide at least one example). (ii) explain Kate Manne’s evaluation of the Heard v. Depp trial. (iii) explain whether or not you agree with Kate Manne’s position—was this trial an instance of epistemic/testimonial injustice? All information necessary to complete this extra credit are provided in the readings.

Specifications: Your paper should be in 12-point font, and double-spaced. It should be no more than 500 words. It should include your name, the text it’s about, and the word count at the top.

Prepare a brief overview of the research project will include a broad description of the behavioral phenomenon, and a brief discussion of its influence on consumer behavior and decision making.

Assignment Question

1: Project Description: A brief overview of the research project will include a broad description of the behavioral phenomenon, a brief discussion of its influence on consumer behavior and decision making and a summary of its potential impact on business (e.g., specific companies or industries) and society. (2 pages )

2. Secondary research: The purpose of this in-depth analysis is to document information that describes the behavioral phenomenon in its various forms and to discuss theoretical ideas, models or frameworks that can explain when, why or how the behavior occurs. Additionally, secondary research will help teams identify social, cultural or other environmental influences that can help marketers understand the behavioral phenomenon(2 pages)

Select articles from journal articles or working papers on Drug Policies, Economic Analysis, Economic Historical Analysis, Medical History, Scientific Analysis, International Diplomacy, and Social and Philosophical Analysis. Then write an integrative summary of seven short papers.

Assignment Question

Write an integrative summary of seven short papers, each of which must be at least three pages long. These papers may be from the academic literature or current news on drug controls, the drug war, the history of illicit or psychoactive drugs, or drug policies from anywhere in the world.

You may select articles from journal articles or working papers on Drug Policies, Economic Analysis, Economic Historical Analysis, Medical History, Scientific Analysis, International Diplomacy, and Social and Philosophical Analysis.

Finally, the documents you cite must include research papers, magazine articles, newspaper articles (5 pages long), or government policy documents published during the last ten (10) years.

The bibliographical selection may address topics from the examples listed below or other topics that you may select: Comparative international policies Historical analysis of policies in different countries Socio-Economic analysis of drug policies Social and Psychological Issues of Drug Use and Policies The Politics and Economics of the War on Drugs International Drug Cartels and their Activities / Violence and Corruption European colonialism and the drug trade in history Foreign Trade and the History of Drugs (Opium and Cocaine)

If you were to do a project again, at work or in another course at Boston University, how will you set yourself and your team up for success?

The following three short questions and answers provide us an opportunity to assess key learning in the course in the areas of project leadership and strategic project management.

Reflect on your experience with this course especially your group project and answer the following questions. References will not count towards the page limit. Be original in your response to get the highest score.

Note – In our course material we have chapter end summaries from Dr. Jeff Sutherland, go through those anecdotes in case you have a “writers blocs”.

If you were to do a project again, at work or in another course at Boston University, how will you set yourself and your team up for success?

Provide three solutions and explain why they are relevant. Agile project management is grounded in the strong belief that communication is very important.

Also, Inspection, Transparency and Adaptation is important. Explain how this occured in your project or can/should have occured so that the project has a better chance to succeed.

Select any one chapter from the reference books such as – Sutherland, J., & Sutherland, J. J. (2014). Scrum: The art of doing twice the work in half the time (1st ed.). New York, NY: Crown Business Publishing.

Highsmith, J. (2010). Agile project management: Creating innovative products (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional. Annotate the highlights of the chapter and provide your insights using one page (single space, about 500 words)

– Do you agree with the authors? What do other researchers say about the same topic? Get one other citation at least. Maximum three citations.